From: lucasea on

<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:eisl7r$8qk_003(a)s995.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <45509E5D.4D41A4DD(a)hotmail.com>,
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
>>>
>>> >Right now, a number of Americans are going to ... India for medical
>>> >care.
>>> >Care to explain why?
>>>
>>> Because our medical system is changing to a national health run
>>> by many chiefs. Since all that paper pushing has to be funded,
>>> monies are going to bureaucracies rather than infrastructure
>>> and labor. The workers are now union; so that adds to labor costs.
>>> All access to medical help is done through insurance company
>>> doors. Doctors are no longer small business[wo]men and the business
>>> is no longer a local business.
>>
>>Now would you care to explain why ppl are going to Indai for medical care
>>?
>
> Because the decisions of treatment is no longer done at the
> doctor-patient level;

What are you on about? I went to the doctor with a headache the other day,
and between us, we decided that I needed a few days of antibiotic to cure my
sinus infection. And because the doctor told me this was necessary, the
insurance company paid for it.

Eric Lucas


From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> I can imagine a day where you login to General
> Motors and fill out the specs for the car you want and have
> it delivered in n days.

You can ?

I can imagine the day when GM goes broke actually. They seem to be hell bent on
this.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >" The days of inheriting a bicycle shop that grew into an airframe
> >manufacturing enterprise are gone. "
>
> Good grief. Pendantic.

Seeking clarity.


> Yep. Nowadays, nobody has to wait for
> their parents to die before making oddles of money.

Most ppl aren't capable of making oodles of money.

Graham

From: lucasea on

<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:eislgp$8qk_005(a)s995.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <45509EF9.BE1B73C6(a)hotmail.com>,
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote
>>> ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message.
>>> >>
>>> >> My state is going to have an all Democrat political system with
>>> >> no checks nor balances.
>>> >
>>> >....and yet somehow you completely fail to see how unhealthy that has
>>> >been
>>> >for the entire country.
>>>
>>> You do need to learn about Consitution. There are checks and
>>> balances working.
>>
>>Bush has been busy removing some of them.
>
> He can't. His powers are checked by the legislature and judicial
> branches of our government.

In an ideal world, yes. However, you'd better open your eyes, because Bush
has been slowly dismantling a number of the checks-and-balances that the
Constitution sets up. Wiretaps without warrants issued by the Judicial
branch is one example. There are several others that I can't think of right
now because I'm tired and my memory is worthless before noon.

Eric Lucas


From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >To be fair, Dell's 22 years old.
>
> I have other examples in another post. From Keith's and my POV,
> 22 years in the computing biz is young, very young.

And I could say it's very old.

How many dedicated DSP processors existed 22 yrs ago for example ?

Graham