Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 20:41 John Larkin wrote: > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:00:38 -0500, John Fields wrote > >On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:28:57 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >>John Larkin wrote: > > >>> I bet you're looking forward to that, boxcars and death camps. Does > >>> "get nasty" include acquiring political power? > >> > >>If it ever came to it, I'd expect it would be the public reacting, not the politicians. > > > >So then you're saying that you're all racists just waiting for > >something to happen so you can let it out? > > Sounds like it. Wasn't there a recent suggestion that the Nazis and > the Brits should have made a deal? Not the Nazis, no although it was suggested that Rudolf Hess was up for it. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 20:42 JoeBloe wrote: > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:53:35 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" > <nobody(a)nowhere.com> Gave us: > > >Facts you are unaware of? > > > >Other national: "I feel bad so I'll talk to my friends" > > > >American: "I feel bad so I'll murder some innocent people" > > > You're an idiot. Euro nations were slaughtering thousands long > before we ever did. Most Americans are Europeans. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 20:43 mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: > > >Until such time as Muslims exist in sufficient numbers the point is utterly moot. > > > A billion, give or take. A billion a continent or 2 away is no threat even assuming they were a *threat* in the first place. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 20:49 mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> writes: > > >AQ and the Islamic-inspired terror organisations are not relateable to WWII > >Germany / Japan / Italy. > > You have a violent and expansionist ideology which openly declares > world domination as its goal. You think it is not relateable? Who does ? > >>>> The US is not demonizing Islam, at this point. > >>> > >>>"at this point..." > >> > >> *Yes*. Your point...? > > > >It is the implied threat. > > Oh, please. First, we've statements along the lines that "the US > should stop demonizing Islam". When it is pointed out that the US is > making the distinction between Islam and Muslim extremsits and *is > not* demonising Islam at this point, then we get "at this point...", > implying "you don't do it yet but we're sure you will so we can > already demand you stop doing it". If you expect me to conduct > conversation at this garbage level, then you're mistaken. Good bye. Are you suggesting that the US *isn't* demonising Islam ? If so, I reckon the point is lost on most Americans for starters. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 20:52
Homer J Simpson wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > > >> > Alternatively you could put every mosque under armed guard and provide > >> > them with no end of support.... :-) > >> > >> Or move them all to the Outer Hebrides - and the Muslims with them! > > > > With such a wide selection to choose from, I often wonder why we have no > > prison islands. You could make the prisoners actually work the land and > > stuff. You never know, it might do them good. > > You don't even have to 'make' them. Provide seeds and a calendar and > pictures of winter. LOL ! They should build their own accomadation too. I couldn't think of anything better for some of the jerks that exist today. Graham |