From: Jim Thompson on 3 Oct 2006 20:27 On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:39:04 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:13:11 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:25:32 +0100, Eeyore >><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Bunch of damn cowboys. >>> >> >>Yaaa-hoo! >> >>John > >Which reminds me that it's time to mosey on home and watch the next >episode of "Deadwood" > >John I'll get out my copy of "Tombstone" ;-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
From: Homer J Simpson on 3 Oct 2006 20:27 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:41t5i2t6cs7srv8lq3nbj33hiuvb8p1ju9(a)4ax.com... >>Now you are a stalker? >> > > Jeez. A remark like that proves that you are a complete idiot. Going from discussion to trying to find personal identification? Pretty much the definition.
From: Homer J Simpson on 3 Oct 2006 20:27 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4522F988.F40738F2(a)hotmail.com... > I'm afraid I've seen US soldiers refer to Iraqis as 'animals'. Wrong ! True. Animals are never as vicious as humans. I prefer DHBs (defective human beings).
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 20:34 T Wake wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > >> > T Wake wrote: > > >> >> Look at the [expletive deleted] from Leeds who blew up the > >> >> underground. For them to function there has to be places where > >> >> they can exist and move about. > >> > > >> > Their homes it would seem and the streets in the places where they > >> > live. > >> > >> Yes. Because the local people support their fight. > > > > Actually it seems that local ppl have been genuinely surprised. > > I suspect most of them are. There have to be enough sympathisers for it to > have happened though. It only needs very few. > >> How can this be the case in a developed country with a democratically > >> elected > >> government and low unemployment? > > > > Because it has nothing to do with any of the above. > > Yet young, educated men decided to kill their country men. > > The problem is they had become disassociated with their own country enough > for this to happen. If they had come from an integrated part of society it > would have been less likely to happen and they would have been less able to > function. I can elaborate on this for sure. 'Traditional' Islamic families have almost nothing in common with the norms of British society. It's inevitable that some of their kids will find it perplexing and revolt ( one way or the other ). Integration is anathema to these ppl. How do you fix that ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Oct 2006 20:35
John Fields wrote: > On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:09:50 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:21:12 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > >> >John Fields wrote: > >> > > >> >> "It" being radical Islam, the goal, in my opinion, would be to > >> >> convert everyone to Islam and have them be subject to control by > >> >> Muslim jurists, the goal being total world domination by Islam. > >> >> > >> >> Refusal to convert would result in death. > >> > > >> >There is no entity called 'radical Islam'. > >> > >> --- > >> Just like there's no entity called 'white supremacists'. > >> --- > >> > >> >Who exactly do you mean ? > >> > >> --- > >> The members of Islam who would have no qualms about relieving you of > >> your head if you refused to convert. > > > >Let me make this clearer. > > > >Who *exactly* do you mean ? > > --- > What, you want _names_? That would be a start. Something more coherent than 'radical islam' for example. Graham |