From: T Wake on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:455E85D8.E13F244(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> T Wake wrote:
>
>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>> > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>> There are people who do not know this stuff. If kids have
>> >>> never handled money, have never been taught what money is,
>> >>> how will they know that a dime is $.10?
>> >>
>> >>These things are taught in kindergarten. If a kid wasn't able to learn
>> >>it
>> >>then, s/he won't be able to learn it now.
>> >
>> > If people never use what they are taught in real life, they will
>> > not know these details.
>>
>> If they never use it in real life, why do they need to learn it? Your
>> claim
>> that parents et al., all use swipe cards to make payments - why not
>> accept
>> that the days of cash are numbered and realise the kids don't need to
>> learn
>> it, they probably will never use it.
>
> I use cash fairly rarely these days.

Same here. Buying the paper is about it.

>> That said, I think you are talking nonsense.
>
> No surprise there.

:-)


From: T Wake on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:455E7778.528025DD(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> unsettled wrote:
>
>> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>> > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>> >
>> >>>I don't have a com port.
>> >>
>> >>On a 486 ? You normally have 2. What does your modem connect to ?
>> >>
>> >>That would be astonishingly unusual ! Where does the mouse go ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Serial ports.
>>
>> It seems to have begun with some terminals which labelled
>> their RS232 ports with the logo "com".
>
> COM is what they're called in DOS !
>
> As in COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4.
>
> The parallel ports are LPT1, LPT2, LPT3 also see PRN.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Com_port

I am not sure what a computer guru like /BAH or her lapdog Unsettled thought
a com port was...


From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:o80tl2d7bpo9919u2296bvnom2h3mqgrq1(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:15:05 -0000, "T Wake"
> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us:
>
>>
>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:ejk9op$8qk_001(a)s922.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>>> In article <1163689355.822964.185390(a)k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>> |||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>So who are you then?
>>>
>>> My moniker is in some listings. JMF's is in all the listings.
>>>
>>
>>Stop alluding then. Tell us. Listings of what? This is USENET, as it
>>stands,
>>based on your recent posts you are currently as believable as tj Frazir.
>>
> As if a twit like you, resting only one notch above TJ Frazir, could
> judge anyone else.

At least I, unlike you, am that one notch above Frazir. Even he laughs at
your posts.


From: T Wake on

"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:movsl2d4vgeql5obo47viq39ok1j56ig1e(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:20:50 +0000, Eeyore
> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us:
>
>>How about you just take a look at when and why this terrorism started ?
>
>
> You are obviously truly clueless as to the reference point for
> either.

Translating that from idiot into English and it should have read "I have
nothing to defend my argument, so I will just insult and pretend I know what
I am talking about."

Well done Joe.


From: unsettled on
T Wake wrote:
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:455EF19C.FD6B2691(a)hotmail.com...
>
>>
>>unsettled wrote:
>>
>>
>>>T Wake wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I have been to the doctor in past, unwell, the doctor has treated me
>>>>and I
>>>>was well again. Once more unsettled is simply wrong.
>>>
>>>A person is never quite as well as they were before the illness.
>>
>>Even if it's minor ?
>>
>>Say a skin rash.
>
>
> It is still irrelevant. I never said "as well as before" so his pedantry
> here is misplaced.

No escape for Wake.