Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 19:42 Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > In article <195aa$455f9d15$49ecf66$14693(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > > >>>Seems about the same as most people I have spoken to. >>> >>> >> >>You guys hang around with a lot of poor folk, do you? LOL > > > You're a real fuckwit. Gratuitous bullshit.
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 18 Nov 2006 19:43 In article <8f134$455fa861$4fe707c$14952(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > Offhand it looks like the USA does better than the UK for our > minimum wage earners who are intent on advancing out of "poverty." > It looks like if they move out of major metroploitan areas and > apply their proverbial nose to the stone to get ahead, they have > a good chance of achieving what has come to be called "The great > American dream" easily enough. Ah you're one of those. "My country right or wrong" PLONK -- Thermodynamics claims another crown! http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/heacon.html -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 19:49 Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > In article <eMidnXo2R9WIOMLYnZ2dnUVZ8qqdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >>It has no point. Unsettled just has a compulsive urge to post - even when it >>doesn't know what it is talking about. It cant help itself. >> >>From what I can gather it has existed on sci.physics in the past under a >>different alias, but it wont say which one that was. > > > Im not surprised. That would seem to suggest their previous ID was an > embarassment. Not that this one is much better of course. > As if the two of you put together had a clue......
From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 19:56 Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > In article <8f134$455fa861$4fe707c$14952(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > > >>Offhand it looks like the USA does better than the UK for our >>minimum wage earners who are intent on advancing out of "poverty." >>It looks like if they move out of major metroploitan areas and >>apply their proverbial nose to the stone to get ahead, they have >>a good chance of achieving what has come to be called "The great >>American dream" easily enough. > > > Ah you're one of those. "My country right or wrong" > > PLONK Beaten at its own game, "it" resigns from the discussion. Go back to talk.bizarre where you belong.
From: Jamie on 18 Nov 2006 20:36
Eeyore wrote: > > unsettled wrote: > > >>Not really. The minimum bandwidth necessary for >>ordinary POTS phone service isn't sufficient to >>support DSL and in much of the US DSL is not >>available. > > > DSL works just fine over good old fashioned twisted pairs. For quite some > distance too. It was found necessary to remove an old RF filter on my line when > it went to 8Mbps though ! > > ADSL2 when implemented should be good for ~ 20Mbps where I live. > http://www.internode.on.net/adsl2/graph/index.htm > > Graham > Goes to show how much you know about DSL services. That really shouldn't surprise me how ever. -- "I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5 |