From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 18:52 T Wake wrote: > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:455F62DF.A7F23744(a)hotmail.com... > >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>So you accept that in America, dying from absence of health care is not >>>>unknown ? >>> >>>Huh? Everybody dies. There is no such thing as a cure for everything. >> >>That isn't what I said. >> >>I said *die from a lack of health care* as in say die from some infection >>whilst >>still young, not die of old age. Clearly you know you have no 'answer' to >>that >>one. > > > He has no answers any more. (If he ever did). > > Speaking of Eeyorte and Wake the above sentence makes sense.
From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 18:53 Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > In article <Ma6dnZaaIbwT7cLYnZ2dnUVZ8v2dnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >>I think unsettled is stuck around the 1960's. >> >>I would be interested to see where council housing is available (granted >>they are cheap), most people have some serious waiting to do. >> >>All he is doing is hand waving, he throws out what he thinks are "worthy" >>phrases (look after the pennies... rags to riches.. etc) but in reality none >>of it conflicts with what is being said and often supports it. > > > The waiting list's for local authorities in my neck of the woods are > around five years IIRC. > That's nice. So people on the waiting list camp out in the park or something? LOL
From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 18:54 T Wake wrote: > "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:phineaspuddleduck-5D5E1B.21515718112006(a)free.teranews.com... > >>In article <Ma6dnZaaIbwT7cLYnZ2dnUVZ8v2dnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >>"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> >>>I think unsettled is stuck around the 1960's. >>> >>>I would be interested to see where council housing is available (granted >>>they are cheap), most people have some serious waiting to do. >>> >>>All he is doing is hand waving, he throws out what he thinks are "worthy" >>>phrases (look after the pennies... rags to riches.. etc) but in reality >>>none >>>of it conflicts with what is being said and often supports it. >> >>The waiting list's for local authorities in my neck of the woods are >>around five years IIRC. >> > > > Seems about the same as most people I have spoken to. > > You guys hang around with a lot of poor folk, do you? LOL
From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 18:54 Ben Newsam wrote: > On Sat, 18 Nov 06 14:59:30 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > >>In article <v86ul2ptr7oev3a76fe96hb720ak07hlmq(a)4ax.com>, >> Ben Newsam <ben.newsam(a)ukonline.co.uk> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 18 Nov 06 12:52:36 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>>There are a few British businesses who bought US companies >>>>and skimmed the cash out. The corruption is not a US >>>>invention. >>> >>>That's not corruption, that's capitalism. >> >>I see. If the UK does it, it's capitalism; if the US does >>it, it's corruption. > > > Well, no. I didn't say that. Actually, you did.
From: unsettled on 18 Nov 2006 18:55
T Wake wrote: > "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message > news:movsl2d4vgeql5obo47viq39ok1j56ig1e(a)4ax.com... > >>On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:20:50 +0000, Eeyore >><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >> >> >>>How about you just take a look at when and why this terrorism started ? >> >> >> You are obviously truly clueless as to the reference point for >>either. > > > Translating that from idiot into English and it should have read "I have > nothing to defend my argument, so I will just insult and pretend I know what > I am talking about." > > Well done Joe. > > Sounds like he's been taking lessons from you. |