From: JoeBloe on 23 Nov 2006 17:13 On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:12:01 -0000, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:cgd4m2pnb2md9d2nue5p1v59o2lnqvdmqj(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:42:05 -0000, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>> >>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>news:o80tl2d7bpo9919u2296bvnom2h3mqgrq1(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:15:05 -0000, "T Wake" >>>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>>> >>>>> >>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:ejk9op$8qk_001(a)s922.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>>>> In article <1163689355.822964.185390(a)k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, >>>>>> |||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>So who are you then? >>>>>> >>>>>> My moniker is in some listings. JMF's is in all the listings. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Stop alluding then. Tell us. Listings of what? This is USENET, as it >>>>>stands, >>>>>based on your recent posts you are currently as believable as tj Frazir. >>>>> >>>> As if a twit like you, resting only one notch above TJ Frazir, could >>>> judge anyone else. >>> >>>At least I, unlike you, am that one notch above Frazir. Even he laughs at >>>your posts. >>> >> >> >> You're an idiot. >> >> He can't even spell the words laugh, your, or post, much less know >> what they mean. > >Yet he still has you beaten hands down. Pretty sad really. I feel sorry for >you. > You need to stop looking in a mirror when you are thinking up your replies. It shows, terribly.
From: T Wake on 23 Nov 2006 17:15 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:p57cm2hcg9fq0nq13693m3usqd6noe7rkc(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:12:01 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:cgd4m2pnb2md9d2nue5p1v59o2lnqvdmqj(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:42:05 -0000, "T Wake" >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>> >>>> >>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>>news:o80tl2d7bpo9919u2296bvnom2h3mqgrq1(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:15:05 -0000, "T Wake" >>>>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:ejk9op$8qk_001(a)s922.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>>>>> In article <1163689355.822964.185390(a)k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, >>>>>>> |||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>So who are you then? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My moniker is in some listings. JMF's is in all the listings. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Stop alluding then. Tell us. Listings of what? This is USENET, as it >>>>>>stands, >>>>>>based on your recent posts you are currently as believable as tj >>>>>>Frazir. >>>>>> >>>>> As if a twit like you, resting only one notch above TJ Frazir, could >>>>> judge anyone else. >>>> >>>>At least I, unlike you, am that one notch above Frazir. Even he laughs >>>>at >>>>your posts. >>>> >>> >>> >>> You're an idiot. >>> >>> He can't even spell the words laugh, your, or post, much less know >>> what they mean. >> >>Yet he still has you beaten hands down. Pretty sad really. I feel sorry >>for >>you. >> > You need to stop looking in a mirror when you are thinking up your > replies. It shows, terribly. Yeah, works well with five year olds - but that is about all you can deal with really. You are pathetic, and as such, you really do have my sympathy. Hopefully one day you will be able to take your place as an adult in society - but at the moment, that day is far, far away.
From: Ken Smith on 23 Nov 2006 17:43 In article <p_b9h.24807$yl4.15267(a)newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >news:c16c5$456482ae$4fe77c5$17631(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> Lloyd Parker wrote: >> [...] >> You've just gone over the cliff with the other lemmings. > >And you think calling people names is a valid substitute for discussing >facts. Nice way to influence people to your point of view. The sad thing is that this steaming pile of turtle droppings isn't very good at it. At least you could hope that when he opened his festering gob something mildly entertaining would come out. Instead that ball of dung he calls a brain can only manage to spew forth the same boring insults as before. A fixation on things like lemmings is fairly common in people suffering from pneumoencephali, so that may explain the things entered repeatedly on his drool-proof keyboard. Creations formed from reanimated vomit, such as him, are the festering canker on the leprid face of his party. Those of us in California, at least, are up wind and need not suffer the miasma-like vapor that exudes from every malodorous pore of the pustule he calls his body. Usenet has its share of maggots and vultures but this one gags them all. What do you want to bet that this now starts a subthread about whether maggots really can gag? -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 23 Nov 2006 18:00 In article <ek4blc$8qk_002(a)s1002.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: [....] >>Don't you just love infinity? It so impressive! The autor seems to have >>confused socialism with communism. Many socialists are in favor of local >>control. > >Local economic control. When the politicians begin to control >the economics, the system becomes communism. You need to break open a text book or dictionary. Communism and socialism are two fairly different concepts. Communist tend to work towards large organizations and central control. Not all socialists do. Basically communists believe in "the efficiency of scale" like a religion. > I'm told >that a successful socialist economy is in Sweden. I have to study >that. > >/BAH > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 23 Nov 2006 18:01
In article <4565B911.11BF2263(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: [...] >How many communist economies exist worldwide ? Zero if you round off to the nearest whole number. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge |