Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 23 Nov 2006 18:14 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <p_b9h.24807$yl4.15267(a)newssvr12.news.prodigy.com>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >>news:c16c5$456482ae$4fe77c5$17631(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>Lloyd Parker wrote: >>> > > [...] > >>>You've just gone over the cliff with the other lemmings. >> >>And you think calling people names is a valid substitute for discussing >>facts. Nice way to influence people to your point of view. > > > > The sad thing is that this steaming pile of turtle droppings isn't very > good at it. At least you could hope that when he opened his festering gob > something mildly entertaining would come out. Instead that ball of dung > he calls a brain can only manage to spew forth the same boring insults as > before. A fixation on things like lemmings is fairly common in people > suffering from pneumoencephali, so that may explain the things entered > repeatedly on his drool-proof keyboard. Creations formed from reanimated > vomit, such as him, are the festering canker on the leprid face of his > party. Those of us in California, at least, are up wind and need not > suffer the miasma-like vapor that exudes from every malodorous pore of the > pustule he calls his body. Usenet has its share of maggots and vultures > but this one gags them all. > > What do you want to bet that this now starts a subthread about whether > maggots really can gag? Lost your edge, did you? Too bad.
From: unsettled on 23 Nov 2006 18:44 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <ek4blc$8qk_002(a)s1002.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > [....] > >>>Don't you just love infinity? It so impressive! The autor seems to have >>>confused socialism with communism. Many socialists are in favor of local >>>control. >>Local economic control. When the politicians begin to control >>the economics, the system becomes communism. > You need to break open a text book or dictionary. Communism and socialism > are two fairly different concepts. Communist tend to work towards large > organizations and central control. Not all socialists do. > Basically communists believe in "the efficiency of scale" like a religion. You might think that, but you're wrong. The differentiating element are that under communism the state owns the means of production and the concept of private property is abolished. You might want to actually read the Manifesto of 1848 and try to understand it in context, maggot brain. http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html >> I'm told >>that a successful socialist economy is in Sweden. I have to study >>that. Too bad you're not able to use www. http://www.lewrockwell.com/dieteman/dieteman33.html "Worst of all, the Swedes have not always acted benevolently, as reported on page A1 of the August 29, 1997, Washington Post, "From 1934 to 1974, 62,000 Swedes were sterilized as part of a national program grounded in the science of racial biology and carried out by officials who believed they were helping to build a progressive, enlightened welfare state...In some cases, couples judged to be inferior parents were sterilized, as were their children when they became teenagers." And: "Unfortunately, sterilizations are just the tip of the iceberg. As the Irish Times and Agence-France Presse reported on April 7, 1998, a Swedish Television documentary reveals that Sweden lobotomized perhaps 4500 "undesirables," in some cases without the consent of their families: "Some 500 lobotomies were conducted on patients who were not from mental hospitals...including a seven-year-old boy in Umeaa in northern Sweden in 1949. Diagnosed as "mentally retarded, hyperactive", he died during surgery."...One man featured in the documentary, who was lobotomised in 1963, is now 67 and has no concept of time, still believing that his children are small. "In part, the benevolent socialist government of Sweden hoped to discover whether 'lobotomies could cure alcoholics and criminals.'"
From: unsettled on 23 Nov 2006 18:47 Ken Smith wrote: > In article <4565B911.11BF2263(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > [...] > >>How many communist economies exist worldwide ? > > > Zero if you round off to the nearest whole number. Maggot brain misspeaks again. China, Cuba, North Korea, and VietNam spring immediately to mind.
From: JoeBloe on 23 Nov 2006 18:49 On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:31:27 -0000, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >Such a grown up insult. You are such a witty genius. Better than what you have coming up... > >Seriously, when you and Frazir get it on, who is the daddy? Oh boy! That was *real* mature... NOT!
From: unsettled on 23 Nov 2006 18:56
JoeBloe wrote: > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:31:27 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > > >>Such a grown up insult. You are such a witty genius. > > > Better than what you have coming up... > >>Seriously, when you and Frazir get it on, who is the daddy? > > > Oh boy! That was *real* mature... NOT! These are sci newsgroups. I've looked at a lot of T.Wake's posts and haven't found a single paragraph that would get past the moderators in sci.physics.research. There are a few like him in these parts. I'm not talking about the general nutcase cranks, but those who profess to be scientists but never ever posit anything to do with science. They're part and parcel of the neverending September. |