Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 27 Nov 2006 16:15 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:456B52B0.A6806E5A(a)hotmail.com... > > > John Fields wrote: > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote >> >> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> Gave us: >> >>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >> >>>> John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: >> >>>> >> >>>> >>That is probably the worst precis of European history I have ever >> >>>> >>read. >> >>>> > >> >>>> >Yeah. I know. I left out the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, two >> >>>> >world wars that we got dragged into and a lot more fun stuff like >> >>>> >that. >> >>>> >--- >> >>>> >> >>>> Hehehehahahahahahah... I like it! >> >>> >> >>>Simple things please simple minds. >> >> >> >> You mean like a retard like you hanging out in Usenet? >> > >> >You are a funny guy. I bet you were so pleased when you learned the word >> >retard. Although given your posts, I suspect it was one of the first >> >words >> >you heard and you've heard it so often, no wonder you cant help but use >> >it >> >so much. >> >> --- >> In reality, how can he help it? >> >> I mean, just take a look at the atrocious construction of your post >> and ask yourself if that's how someone who pretends to be as >> intelligent as you do should be writing. >> >> Let's look at the second sentence: "I bet you were so pleased when >> you learned the word retard." >> >> In the first place, "I bet"... is just plain wrong. You didn't >> bet anything, so the proper form should have been something like >> "I'd bet... >> >> In the second place, it's not a sentence, it's a sentence fragment >> because it has no proper ending. If it had an ending, it would read >> something like: "I'd bet you were so pleased when you learned the >> word 'retard' that you smiled from ear to ear." >> >> That's because the adverb 'so' is called the 'intensive so' when >> it's used in the way you used it, in writing, and requires a >> completing 'that' clause. >> >> There's much more, but should someone's vocabulary contain the word >> 'retard', as mine does, that's likely to be one of the first words >> that springs to mind as I try to slog through the garbage you write. > > And you reckon T Wake and I are trolling ? I stand by my previous comment on this. Kill Filing him is a good move.
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 27 Nov 2006 16:16 In article <5uCdnTRCMMP4yPbYnZ2dnUVZ8tCdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > > > And you reckon T Wake and I are trolling ? > > I stand by my previous comment on this. Kill Filing him is a good move. I'm outta here too. This has gone beyond saving. Killfilling the thread ;-) -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: krw on 27 Nov 2006 16:20 In article <456B52F1.9FDDA37E(a)hotmail.com>, rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > krw wrote: > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > > > I do wish you'd use a proper sig. > > > > > > Why ? Is my name not good enough ? > > > > I don't care what you put in it, use a proper sig separator. Not > > doing so makes you no better than a top-poster. > > > > -- > > Keith > > What exactly is the big deal with that ? I see. You are no better than a pig-ignorant top-poster. -- Keith
From: T Wake on 27 Nov 2006 16:22 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:456B52F1.9FDDA37E(a)hotmail.com... > > > krw wrote: > >> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > >> > > I do wish you'd use a proper sig. >> > >> > Why ? Is my name not good enough ? >> >> I don't care what you put in it, use a proper sig separator. Not >> doing so makes you no better than a top-poster. >> >> -- >> Keith > > What exactly is the big deal with that ? He is too lazy to remove the bits he doesn't want posted in his replies and wants you to use the --[cr] separator. I suspect this thread is coming to the end of its natural life. JoeBloe has nothing to say other than insults, krw has run out of things to say other than laming on sig separators, John Fields is trying to be a holier than thou anti-troll grammar Nazi, BAH is properly out of touch with reality and by some Bizzaro twist unsettled has started having reasonable debates. Strange really.
From: T Wake on 27 Nov 2006 16:24
"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:phineaspuddleduck-C37981.21161027112006(a)free.teranews.com... > In article <5uCdnTRCMMP4yPbYnZ2dnUVZ8tCdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >> > >> > And you reckon T Wake and I are trolling ? >> >> I stand by my previous comment on this. Kill Filing him is a good move. > > I'm outta here too. This has gone beyond saving. Killfilling the thread > ;-) > It was funny for a while :-) Still there is always Relf. |