Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: krw on 27 Nov 2006 16:00 In article <ekdfd1$906$11(a)blue.rahul.net>, kensmith(a)green.rahul.net says... > In article <4569F8E3.9C04DE39(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >John Fields wrote: > > > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> When they talk about capitalism, it isn't our definition and > >> >> we get in fights. What seems even odder, Europeans call > >> >> the thingie we call socialism, capitalism. I haven't explored > >> >> this further. So add a grain of salt. > >> > > >> >There is no such confusion other than in your interpretation of the > >meanings of > >> >the word. There is no socialist party in the USA btw. > >> > >> --- > >> What's this, then? > >> > >> http://sp-usa.org/ > > > >Do they have any elected representatives ? > > Bernie Sanders aint chopped liver. I wish he were. As much as I hate liver, it's far better than having Bernie my representative. -- Keith
From: Eeyore on 27 Nov 2006 16:03 John Fields wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote > >> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> Gave us: > >>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > >>>> John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: > >>>> > >>>> >>That is probably the worst precis of European history I have ever > >>>> >>read. > >>>> > > >>>> >Yeah. I know. I left out the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, two > >>>> >world wars that we got dragged into and a lot more fun stuff like > >>>> >that. > >>>> >--- > >>>> > >>>> Hehehehahahahahahah... I like it! > >>> > >>>Simple things please simple minds. > >> > >> You mean like a retard like you hanging out in Usenet? > > > >You are a funny guy. I bet you were so pleased when you learned the word > >retard. Although given your posts, I suspect it was one of the first words > >you heard and you've heard it so often, no wonder you cant help but use it > >so much. > > --- > In reality, how can he help it? > > I mean, just take a look at the atrocious construction of your post > and ask yourself if that's how someone who pretends to be as > intelligent as you do should be writing. > > Let's look at the second sentence: "I bet you were so pleased when > you learned the word retard." > > In the first place, "I bet"... is just plain wrong. You didn't > bet anything, so the proper form should have been something like > "I'd bet... > > In the second place, it's not a sentence, it's a sentence fragment > because it has no proper ending. If it had an ending, it would read > something like: "I'd bet you were so pleased when you learned the > word 'retard' that you smiled from ear to ear." > > That's because the adverb 'so' is called the 'intensive so' when > it's used in the way you used it, in writing, and requires a > completing 'that' clause. > > There's much more, but should someone's vocabulary contain the word > 'retard', as mine does, that's likely to be one of the first words > that springs to mind as I try to slog through the garbage you write. And you reckon T Wake and I are trolling ? Graham
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 27 Nov 2006 16:03 In article <66bmm29tl5hrpc5k7a2nk33fed404bmoat(a)4ax.com>, JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:44:43 +0000, Phineas T Puddleduck > <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> Gave us: > > >In article <mmvjm2hqo6e1n5umtk2lui4kjutvjh4idf(a)4ax.com>, > > JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:38:11 -0600, John Fields > >> <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: > >> > >> >>That is probably the worst precis of European history I have ever read. > >> > > >> >--- > >> >Yeah. I know. I left out the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, two > >> >world wars that we got dragged into and a lot more fun stuff like > >> >that. > >> >--- > >> > >> Hehehehahahahahahah... I like it! > > > >Simple things please simple minds. > > > > You mean like a retard like you hanging out in Usenet? Or the even worse retard like you posting your inconsequential, ill informed nonsense. -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Eeyore on 27 Nov 2006 16:04 krw wrote: > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... > > > > > I do wish you'd use a proper sig. > > > > Why ? Is my name not good enough ? > > I don't care what you put in it, use a proper sig separator. Not > doing so makes you no better than a top-poster. > > -- > Keith What exactly is the big deal with that ? Graham
From: T Wake on 27 Nov 2006 16:08
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:456B4A29.D4554B63(a)hotmail.com... > > > John Fields wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:26:11 -0000, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> >Sadly given the sci.* nature of all the groups (un)fortunate enough to >> >be >> >graced with this long running thread, there is very little understanding >> >of >> >science displayed. >> >> --- >> And why should there be? >> >> The thread has nothing to with science regardless of whether >> "science" is in the subject line or not, and its content is >> off-topic in all the groups it's been posted to, being used mostly >> to annoy by trolls like you and Graham. > > Us ??? Trolls ??? > > You seem to be taking a keen interest in it too btw. One of the things I always get amused over on USENET is when people get on their high horses about Trolls and trolling. John seems to have snipped some of the critical context of my message, solely to accuse us of being trolls. In the past, I have found the people who are most vocal about calling others trolls, are doing little other than troll themselves. If he thinks we are nothing but trolls - why reply? |