Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Dec 2006 06:58 In article <9OKdncnQ5K4OnubYnZ2dnUVZ8qKvnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"Borek" <m.borkowski(a)delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message >news:op.tkayhaxz26l578(a)borek... >> On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:15:25 +0100, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>> The way the Democrats tested reactions >>>>>> of the US was to go to Europe and give a speech that contained >>>>>> the ideas they wanted a reaction test. BBC would report on >>>>>> the speech. The American news media would report on what >>>>>> the BBC reported minus the fact that it came from some guy's >>>>>> speech. The politician would then watch to see how the >>>>>> voters of the US received it. What you saw a the Democrat >>>>>> platform had been vetted through Europe this way. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, considering Europeans are healthier, are happier, live longer, >>>>> are >>>>> more educated and more literate, etc., maybe we could take some >>>>> lessons. >>>> >>>> We do? Good, I am not moving anywehere. >>> >>> <grin> You detected the attitude, too. >> >> Nope. I was deadly serious ;) > >I may be wrong, You are. > but I think she thought you lived in the US ;-) Nope. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 10 Dec 2006 07:00 In article <457B3521.D8EAC3E8(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Borek <m.borkowski(a)delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote: >> >On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:12:50 +0100, Lloyd Parker <lparker(a)emory.edu> wrote: >> > >> >>> The way the Democrats tested reactions >> >>> of the US was to go to Europe and give a speech that contained >> >>> the ideas they wanted a reaction test. BBC would report on >> >>> the speech. The American news media would report on what >> >>> the BBC reported minus the fact that it came from some guy's >> >>> speech. The politician would then watch to see how the >> >>> voters of the US received it. What you saw a the Democrat >> >>> platform had been vetted through Europe this way. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Well, considering Europeans are healthier, are happier, live longer, are >> >> more educated and more literate, etc., maybe we could take some lessons. >> > >> >We do? Good, I am not moving anywehere. >> >> <grin> You detected the attitude, too. > >You're aware he's from Poland ? Yes. He's been giving us some the gossip from that end of Europe which is quite different from your end. /BAH
From: T Wake on 10 Dec 2006 08:13 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:6htmn25g1sa5ktj1m46trf5lq66ri3cq98(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:33:32 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>Like you'd know. When you sober up you still think it is 1876. >> > > You're an idiot. That is throughout the entire post. I merely > chose this segment as a gem of your utter stupidity. Yeah, as I said, you pick on one post. Even saying the "entire post" still only talks about one post. It is nice to see you have started to construct multiple sentences to lace with your insults though. Well done. Are the little blue and red pills working now?
From: T Wake on 10 Dec 2006 08:15 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:rktmn2hu8p0t5ph50iuskjube7mcu4hmum(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:36:19 -0000, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >>> You are a hypocrite as well I see. >> >>I have been called worse. You are really bad at insults. You only have >>seven >>or eight words to choose from. > > > You affirming being a hypocrite destroys any modicum of honor or > character you may have had a chance at having had an inkling of in > your pathetic body at any time in your pathetic life. Blimey, did you have to get help with all that? I am sure, somewhere in your nasty, obsessive little mind, you think what I wrote was an affirmation when in reality I only pointed out I have been called worse. It is good to see you are getting better at writing longer sentences. Do you get more home help at the weekend or something?
From: T Wake on 10 Dec 2006 08:16
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:elgsom$8ss_005(a)s892.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <9OKdncnQ5K4OnubYnZ2dnUVZ8qKvnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>"Borek" <m.borkowski(a)delete.chembuddy.these.com.parts> wrote in message >>news:op.tkayhaxz26l578(a)borek... >>> On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:15:25 +0100, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>> The way the Democrats tested reactions >>>>>>> of the US was to go to Europe and give a speech that contained >>>>>>> the ideas they wanted a reaction test. BBC would report on >>>>>>> the speech. The American news media would report on what >>>>>>> the BBC reported minus the fact that it came from some guy's >>>>>>> speech. The politician would then watch to see how the >>>>>>> voters of the US received it. What you saw a the Democrat >>>>>>> platform had been vetted through Europe this way. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, considering Europeans are healthier, are happier, live longer, >>>>>> are >>>>>> more educated and more literate, etc., maybe we could take some >>>>>> lessons. >>>>> >>>>> We do? Good, I am not moving anywehere. >>>> >>>> <grin> You detected the attitude, too. >>> >>> Nope. I was deadly serious ;) >> >>I may be wrong, > > You are. > >> but I think she thought you lived in the US ;-) > > Nope. > Ok. I don't get what you meant then. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming it was supposed to be funny, but now it just doesn't make sense. |