Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 13 Jan 2007 13:39 On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:24:29 -0000, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"MassiveProng" <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in >message news:fu4iq214gej7b621sdr4s3j88grvp4cpgd(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:29:44 -0000, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>>Somalis who think the ICU are a good thing. >>>Just because you and I think of them as "terrorists" does not mean the >>>term >>>has an abstract, definite, value. >> >> So how do you classify such things as embassy bombings? > >Me personally or the Somalis who support the ICU? Your snippage has removed >the majority of the context but, I can answer for myself and they are >terrorists. Read the original message to get more of an idea of what the >other side may think. > >By the way, "MassiveProng" is probably more appropriate than "JoeBloe." > Does this mean that you are going to change yours to "BrainlessWonder"?
From: The Ghost In The Machine on 13 Jan 2007 13:56 In sci.physics, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote on Sat, 13 Jan 07 16:45:35 GMT <eob2bf$8ss_013(a)s987.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>: > In article <45A8F9B4.EF2208ED(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> I do it today with the my 14,400 modem. >> >>Can you not even get anything faster than that ? > > Why? 14400 is faster than anything I've used before. I > don't need anything faster. > > /BAH Wow. 53k [*] dialup modems are standard issue on many machines (though they won't be for long, as WiFi takes over). [*] FCC mandated upper limit for dialup lines. Why, I forget. -- #191, ewill3(a)earthlink.net Useless C++ Programming Idea #110309238: item * f(item *p) { if(p = NULL) return new item; else return p; } -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Michael A. Terrell on 13 Jan 2007 14:06 The Ghost In The Machine wrote: > > In sci.physics, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> > wrote > on Sat, 13 Jan 07 16:45:35 GMT > <eob2bf$8ss_013(a)s987.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>: > > In article <45A8F9B4.EF2208ED(a)hotmail.com>, > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > >>> I do it today with the my 14,400 modem. > >> > >>Can you not even get anything faster than that ? > > > > Why? 14400 is faster than anything I've used before. I > > don't need anything faster. > > > > /BAH > > Wow. 53k [*] dialup modems are standard issue on many machines > (though they won't be for long, as WiFi takes over). > > [*] FCC mandated upper limit for dialup lines. Why, I forget. The availble bandwidth on a multiplexed phone line. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 14:09 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > >> We certainly gathered tons of information about the trafficing. > >> I don't why that can't be converted to a sound rather than > >> a picture on the TTY. > >> > >> I don't know if anybody put a speaker on an ethernet. I'll have > >> to ask. > > > > Does your hearing go to 10 Mhz, 100 MHz or even 1 GHz? Can you find > >a speaker that goes that high? Data over ethernet is in small fixed > >length packets and the higher the bandwidth, the less time it takes to > >send a packet. A cable modem has transmit and receive LEDs that flicker > >with each packet, but even an online audio or video stream can have > >several seconds between bursts of data packets. Its a completely > >different game. > > I'd probably assign a set of sounds to each layer. I'd have recall > the specs to figure out how to assign sound within each layer. And how is that going to work with packets ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 14:10
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> I do it today with the my 14,400 modem. > > > >Can you not even get anything faster than that ? > > Why? 14400 is faster than anything I've used before. I > don't need anything faster. You lack imagination. Actually come to think of it your imagination runs rampant about Europe but comes to crazy conclusions ! Graham |