Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 14:26 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > > >>Can you hook a speaker up to an ethernet cable? > > > > We certainly gathered tons of information about the trafficing. > > I don't why that can't be converted to a sound rather than > > a picture on the TTY. > > The data probably can be converted into sound but it strikes me as very, > very pointless task. > > > I don't know if anybody put a speaker on an ethernet. I'll have > > to ask. > > It would be an odd person who wanted to listen to data streams - as they > would have to be slowed down significantly to be intelligible in any way or > form. A similarity to this is high speed computer generated Morse code. > Human operators can "listen" to the signal but it is at a speed which blurs > the data into one long sound. I do recall that the Elliot 803 that was the first computer I had the benefit of using had a console that emitted various warbles in a Doctor Who like manner. It was mildly entertaining. Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 14:28 Phil Carmody wrote: > I don't mind hanging off the side of the BMI bell curve. And how is it that there's one curve for all shapes and sizes ? I haven't grown in height for example yet since my 20s my chest measurement has increased by about 6 inches ( bigger bones ). Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 14:34 Ken Smith wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >I've heard it suggested that it was done for commercial reasons. The > >Indians were > >working on using thorium in reactors and the USA didn't like the idea they might > >be energy independent in that sector. > > If they made a good one and patented it, they would just about have a lock > on the industry. Thorium reactors have some attractive features. Indeed. Apparently the Indian nuclear scientists are hopping mad about it. Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 14:39 T Wake wrote: > "MassiveProng" <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote > > > > You got a GriseTard that posts under several simultaneously. Why > > don't I see any WakeTard remarks on him? At least I only post under > > one at a time. > > > > Get lost, dumbfuck. Life is to be enjoyed, and you jacking off at > > the mouth is far worse than any name I ever called anyone. > > Did I hit a sore spot? I have not seen Eric post under different nyms > otherwise I may mention it. But as it seems your new nym remains as unable > to debate as the old one, there is no real reason to continue debating. He was referring to Rich Grise who posts in s.e.d Graham
From: Eeyore on 13 Jan 2007 14:40
The Ghost In The Machine wrote: > In sci.physics, Ken Smith <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > >>I do not trust him blindly. He is the only one in > >>Washington who seems to be trying deal with the real problem. > > > > Real problem: A bunch of incompetent idiots have gained control of the > > Whitehouse. > > And were reelected in 2004. By even more idiots. Graham |