From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 15:50 John Fields wrote: > Graham was pooh-poohing Gordon's claim that there's a process going > on to end terrorism, and I was pointing out that Graham has no clue > about what's being done in secret, just like most of the rest of us. You have to be mad to think "anything is going on in secret" except more stupidity. Why else would the USA be blundering from one failure to the next ? Graham
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 15:51 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:4524A9AF.708AE0D3(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> Soon Teacher will turn up to put a stop to this playground fight. > > > > Really? Do you know why the teacher left? He's out making book on > the fight, Probably. > and the odds are in our favor. Really? What did Teacher set as the victory condition? This is USENET, despite all the hard talk and macho strutting all people are doing is typing words. How can any one win or lose a "tauntfight" like that?
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 15:55 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:45243F99.4CC1801A(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:4523D85F.43BBD99C(a)earthlink.net... >> > Jim Thompson wrote: >> >> >> >> I should know shortly what low-life job Eric has at Battelle... my >> >> guess is janitor ;-) >> > >> > Are you sure they would give him that much responsibility? >> > >> >> It is interesting that instead of disagreeing with Eric's comments and >> explaining why, the general response has been to criticise his imagined >> work >> status. >> >> Nothing I have seen in this thread seems to relate to his job and he has >> not >> claimed professional authority based on his employment so what, on Earth, >> does his job matter? >> >> Unless this really is a pathetic attempt to "one up" on someone you think >> is >> in a lower paid / less "exalted" job. If it is, you really should be >> ashamed >> of yourselves. > > > Yawn. You invade our newsgroup with crossposted bullshit, then you > want to set the rules? Forget it. > Ouch. You cutting wit has shamed me. I do apologise. However, as you feel able to invade our newsgroup with crossposted bullshit (and imply your rules are more acceptable) I must bow to your masterful double standards. Based on the frank and honest response, I see it really is a case of you having nothing better to defend your position than a collection of logical fallacies wrapped up in schoolground taunts.
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 15:56 "YD" <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote in message news:esn9i2dmt34geb4aqp39u5dknbp1bqms6p(a)4ax.com... > > Overall damn immature, and that goes for those bothering to keep it > going too. Sadly true. Still entertainment is where you can find it and there are some reasonable people (on both sides of the fence) posting in this thread.
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 15:57
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:45252809.A20CE3E6(a)earthlink.net... > YD wrote: >> >> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:13:35 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> >news:4523D85F.43BBD99C(a)earthlink.net... >> >> Jim Thompson wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I should know shortly what low-life job Eric has at Battelle... my >> >>> guess is janitor ;-) >> >> >> >> >> >> Are you sure they would give him that much responsibility? >> >> >> > >> >It is interesting that instead of disagreeing with Eric's comments and >> >explaining why, the general response has been to criticise his imagined >> >work >> >status. >> > >> >Nothing I have seen in this thread seems to relate to his job and he has >> >not >> >claimed professional authority based on his employment so what, on >> >Earth, >> >does his job matter? >> > >> >Unless this really is a pathetic attempt to "one up" on someone you >> >think is >> >in a lower paid / less "exalted" job. If it is, you really should be >> >ashamed >> >of yourselves. >> > >> >> It's just a bunch of obnoxious bitter old men and has-beens with no >> real control over much of anything anymore. They've transferred their >> lives to this ng. Their only way of one-upping is to degrade those not >> espousing their POVs to below their level with name calling and >> ridicule with no substance of fact. >> >> Makes them look like school-yard bullies or teen-age gangs hanging out >> on street corners. >> >> Overall damn immature, and that goes for those bothering to keep it >> going too. > > > Bitter? Are you sure? In truth, we enjoy watching morons prove > their stupidity, day by day, and hour by hour. > Ah, but you don't need anyone else to post for that..... |