From: lucasea on 5 Oct 2006 17:00 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:qkrai2hvpp43t4lpu1ttca9tpq8ueb94qr(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:17 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>Which one would that be, the dangers of driving on the nation's highways? >>That's at least 3 orders of magnitude greater of a real threat to every >>person in the country than is terrorism. > > 3000 people died at the WTC. Three orders of magnitude from that is 3 > million. We kill about 40K people a year in car accidents. ....integrated over the history of the automobile, it's within a factor of two of 3 orders of magnitude. It's closer to 3 orders of magnitude than 2 or 4. Sheesh, in case you missed my point, driving a car is vastly more of a threat to society than is terrorism. Eric Lucas
From: Michael A. Terrell on 5 Oct 2006 17:00 T Wake wrote: > > Ouch. You cutting wit has shamed me. I do apologise. > > However, as you feel able to invade our newsgroup with crossposted bullshit > (and imply your rules are more acceptable) I must bow to your masterful > double standards. Yawn. > Based on the frank and honest response, I see it really is a case of you > having nothing better to defend your position than a collection of logical > fallacies wrapped up in schoolground taunts. Not true: I have NEVER taunted a schoolground. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 17:01 John Larkin wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:03:13 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> >It's what Bush has done to America that's horrible. It's brought the very > >> >worst out in eveyone there. It was fine under Clinton. > >> > >> No. It was not fine at all. > > > >It looked a heck of a lot better to me and least he was an intelligent and > >articulate man, something that could never be said of Bush. > > Of course he was articulate. Many sociopaths are. And Bush *isn't* one ? Graham
From: Kurt Ullman on 5 Oct 2006 17:03 In article <gZCdncvdOOR47LjYRVny2w(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: hall. > > The fact they all have big, sloped, foreheads and the same surname is > suspicious to say the least :-) > Aunt Mom and Uncle Dad is another dead giveaway. If your family tree don't branch.... >
From: Michael A. Terrell on 5 Oct 2006 17:03
T Wake wrote: > > Good job he could stand on you to stay clear. In your dreams. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |