Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 5 Oct 2006 16:50 On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:19:37 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >John Larkin wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >Keith wrote: >> >> >> Meanwhile, the stuffed donkey will watch the documentary about the >> >> wild west, "Blazing Saddles". >> > >> >I've never watched it. It's far too tedious. >> > >> >Graham >> >> Most of Mel Brooks' stuff is loaded with Hollywood insider jokes, >> usually mocking studio fatheads. His "Robin Hood: Men in Tights" did a >> nice job on Kevin Cosner. Like in Wodehouse's books, the plots are >> just a framework to hold things up. > >I find the humour too juvenile for my taste. It's like finding farts funny >and nothing else. --- I suggest American and Jewish all at once is too much for you... -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 16:53 John Larkin wrote: > If you want to get snippy, consider this: there are several times more > Native Americans alive now, in the USA, than there were when Columbus > landed in the Americas. And there is a tiny fraction of the Jews > living in Germany than there were in 1935. What's that got to do with anything ? You're saying you're better than the Nazis ? Sure I'll go for that. Graham
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 16:54 John Larkin wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >Lloyd Parker wrote: > >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > >> >A lot of this anti-US fervor started with Democrat Presidential > >> >candidates trying out their sound bytes in 2002-2004 in Europe. > >> > > >> >/BAH > >> OH BS. It started with Bush invading another nation. > > > >Correct. I didn't really give a damn before. > > > >Graham > > So, seriously: why do you care now? America is now threatening my way of life. Graham
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 16:55 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eg2o32$8qk_003(a)s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <452390F5.E960000B(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >>> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> >>> T Wake wrote: >>> >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> >>>> >>> >>>> > This mess is about changing a mindset; either Western >>> >>>> > civilization's >>> >>>> > mindset is changed or religious extremists' mindset is changed. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I agree completely. >>> >>> >>> >>> How about removing the either and replacing the or with and ? >>> >> >>> >> Also an option. Any one of those three will work. >>> > >>> >I think the mutual concession option >>> >>> This option does not exist. >> >>You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? > > Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to > alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it > alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist. > Islam hasn't altered anything about your lifestyle. The measures you, or your government acting on your behalf, have taken have altered that lifestyle. How much of your lifestyle are you willing to alter to be allowed to exist? Living as a Muslim under Sharia law is not a 100% alteration of your lifestyle, would you take that option to continue your existence? If not, where would you draw the line? Is it OK as long as other people make sacrifices for your existence?
From: Michael A. Terrell on 5 Oct 2006 16:58
T Wake wrote: > > Really? What did Teacher set as the victory condition? This is USENET, > despite all the hard talk and macho strutting all people are doing is typing > words. How can any one win or lose a "tauntfight" like that? Endurance. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |