Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 15:58 John Larkin wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 06 09:58:50 GMT, lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) > wrote: > > >>A lot of this anti-US fervor started with Democrat Presidential > >>candidates trying out their sound bytes in 2002-2004 in Europe. > >> > >>/BAH > >OH BS. It started with Bush invading another nation. > > Actually, it started with FDR invading another nation. France, > specifically. You're being very very silly. Graham
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 15:58 "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > Bitter? Are you sure? In truth, we enjoy watching morons prove > their stupidity, day by day, and hour by hour. Whereas you prove your stupidity every time you post. Graham
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 15:59 <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:6d%Ug.9902$e66.1245(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > news:tOmdnf6_-qawlbnYRVnyiw(a)pipex.net... >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4522F755.6FBE3BED(a)hotmail.com... >>> >>> >>> T Wake wrote: >>> >>>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >>>> >>>> > That's not my recollection. >>>> >>>> Ok, it is my recollection though. >>> >>> Fair nuff ! >>> >>>> >> You need to stop reading too much implied criticism where there isnt >>>> >> any. >>>> > >>>> > There's been *loads* ! >>>> >>>> In my posts? >>> >>> A misunderstanding it seems. >> >> Possibly. The joys of the text based USENET. :-) > > Yes, let's do stick to getting offended by the *ex*plicit insults. There > are way more than enough of those in this thread to go around. Yes. Easier to not get offended by anything here :-)
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 16:01 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45243BFD.9C297BE5(a)hotmail.com... > > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > >> > Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon. >> > >> > Is that what you want ? >> >> What alternative do they have? Until the Palestinians and Arabs can >> accept >> Israel's existence, Israel can not hold off on its defensive posture. >> >> Do you advocate Israel surrender? > > Many Arab nations have sorted this one out. We really do need to bash the > Israeli and Palestinian heads together. The Palestinians have been offered the same all other Arab nation have been offered. Is there ever going to be an acceptable midde ground? > Whilst Israel continues to get a blank cheque from the USA it's not going > to > happen of course. Maybe. Hard to think of a reason why the US should abandon it's support of Israel though.
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 16:01
John Fields wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:47:30 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon. > > --- > Trying to set up another straw man? > --- > > >Is that what you want ? > > --- > Nope, but since you state that that's the only way Israel can win, > it seems that if you don't want Israel destroyed, that's what > _you're_ advocating. > > In reality, though, your preferred "solution" would be to see Israel > ("The Real Demon" according to you) destroyed, and yet you pretend > to advocate non-violence. > > How can you reconcile that hypocrisy? I have *never* said any such thing. The answer is for Israel and the Palestinians to come to a peaceful accord. Nothing else will ever work. End of story. Graham |