Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 16:45 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:msaai21n7dfgk1eute5i3na3voc5fm2ue1(a)4ax.com... > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:46:43 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>John Fields wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:28:57 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >>> >John Larkin wrote: >>> >> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:55:57 +0100, Eeyore wrote: >>> >> >John Larkin wrote: >>> > >>> >> > >>> >> >It [WW2] simply has zero relevance to the issue at hand. Mind you, >>> >> >just to put your fevered >> >> >American >>> minds at rest, should European Islam be stupid enough to get 'nasty' >>> expect another >> >> >Kristallnacht' with >>> Muslims being progromised. >>> >> >>> >> I bet you're looking forward to that, boxcars and death camps. Does >>> >> "get nasty" include acquiring political power? >>> > >>> >If it ever came to it, I'd expect it would be the public reacting, not >>> >the politicians. >>> >>> --- >>> So then you're saying that you're all racists just waiting for >>> something to happen so you can let it out? >> >>No. >> >>I'm saying that if someone threatens their fundamental freedoms, >the British public will defend them. You should approve of that. > > --- > Yes, I would, but I think if they're sufficiently demonized what's > more likely is that if your government decides that it's boxcars and > death camps for them, then you'll watch 'em get loaded up just like > the good non-Jewish citizens of Germany did about 60 years ago. > --- > > It won't happen anyway, it's purely hypothetical. > > --- > I'm sure the Jews in Germany thought the same thing until the > reality of it was forced on them. Are you now advocating a more reasonable treatment of Muslims? Excellent. If the government should decide sufficiently demonise [insert religion] then I fully intend to convert to said religion and do what I can to fight back. (Albeit probably not much. I can write some sarcastic letters though).
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 16:46 John Fields wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 14:22:23 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > the State of Israel was founded on terrorism > >itself. That's historical fact. > > --- > It's not a truth, It's a fact. Jewish terrorists even kidnapped and killed British servicemen in the same way we're supposed to censure Hezbollah. Graham
From: John Larkin on 5 Oct 2006 16:47 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:17 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >Which one would that be, the dangers of driving on the nation's highways? >That's at least 3 orders of magnitude greater of a real threat to every >person in the country than is terrorism. 3000 people died at the WTC. Three orders of magnitude from that is 3 million. We kill about 40K people a year in car accidents. John
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 16:47 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:eg32m7$okg$4(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <7qCdnW1uWfo2B7_YRVny3w(a)pipex.net>, > T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > [....] >>A surprisingly small number of Islamic extremists are actually willing to >>die for their cause you know? > > Their belief system encourages it with promices of virgins etc. Yet all the nasty old men who encourage the bombers refuse to do it themselves. > They > would be far less willing to spend the rest of their lives in jail than to > die as a result. Dieing of old age doesn't get you the free ticket to > heaven. I agree, life in Jail would be a better option. They are, after all, criminals and killing them just gives them status amongst others.
From: John Fields on 5 Oct 2006 16:45
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:16:49 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Keith wrote: > >> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> > Keith wrote: >> >> > > Meanwhile, the stuffed donkey will watch the documentary about the >> > > wild west, "Blazing Saddles". >> > >> > I've never watched it. It's far too tedious. >> ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ >> >> Of course! You know everything, even what's tedious without having >> watched. > >The first few minutes are enough to put me off. I've even accidentally come >across bits in the middle and it's not better. It's typical American >brain-dead slime designed to appeal to the mentally feeble. --- Ah, you watched it from level 1... Figures. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |