Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 1 Feb 2007 21:45 On 01 Feb 2007 18:45:03 +0200, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> Gave us: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >> The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >> This included all of the infrastructure required. >> The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >> has to do that work. > >It also includes the requirement that you think 6 is 3. > >BAH maths is BAD maths. > >It also presumes that Szil?rd, Teller, Einstein and Oppenheimer, >had no knowledge before they started working on the projects. >Weird, as Szil?rd was researching the matter at about the same >time as the Erm?chtigungsgesetz was kicking in (but not publishing >his work for that very reason). > >BAH history is BAD history. > BAHSHIT! Gesundheit!
From: MassiveProng on 1 Feb 2007 21:47 On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:30:17 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> Gave us: >An idiot named DumbDonkey splattered ascii that resembles: > >> >> unsettled wrote: >> >> >>>Eeyore wrote: >>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Most devices these days are in warm start mode. Instead >>>>>of measuring before and after power-on, the tests need >>>>>to measure before and after _plug-in_. >>>> >>>> >>>>Nothing is measured when it isn't plugged in ! >>> >>>You display your ignorance. The background is measured. >> >> >> After I hit send I realised I should have written "no product". I just knew an >> idiot would complain. > >Crucial information is measured. This is a feeble >attempt to cover up your stupidity. Not many posts ago, you were baking up the BAHTard's assertion that a baseline reading made it a flawed test. Which is it? Crucial data extraction or flaw?
From: MassiveProng on 1 Feb 2007 21:51 On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:37:58 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> Gave us: >Eeyore wrote: > >> >> Ken Smith wrote: >> >> >>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>unsettled wrote: >>>> >>>>>Eeyore wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Most devices these days are in warm start mode. Instead >>>>>>>of measuring before and after power-on, the tests need >>>>>>>to measure before and after _plug-in_. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Nothing is measured when it isn't plugged in ! >>>>> >>>>>You display your ignorance. The background is measured. >>>> >>>>After I hit send I realised I should have written "no product". I just knew an >>>>idiot would complain. >>> >>>Still wrong. You missed all the cases where there is a backup battery. >>>You have to measure when the plug is pulled adn the backup is in use too. >> >> >> Oh puhleeeze ! All this fuss over what's actually on and what's off ! I am aware of >> the differences. >> >> I was only trying to address BAH's stupid stove. > >I'd want to make sure that there was no backup battery for >the clock. The clock shuts off and resets when she unplugs it. Get a clue, dumb twit. > >You claim to be aware. ROFL! >When's the brain transplant? You really spew some pretty lame lames there, lame-O.
From: MassiveProng on 1 Feb 2007 21:55 On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:55:51 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >unsettled wrote: > >> Eeyore wrote: >> > unsettled wrote: >> >>Eeyore wrote: >> >> >> >>>It's not a nightmare [EMC compliance]. I should know, I'm the one dealing with it >> >> >> >>in > my work not you. >> >> >> >>You *should* know. >> > >> > >> > I *do* know. >> >> Everything you've written proves you *don't* know. > >Do tell how many products you've taken through the compliance process. I know EXACTLY what that number is! It ztartz with a Z.
From: MassiveProng on 1 Feb 2007 21:57
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:35:30 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >unsettled wrote: > >> Phil Carmody wrote: >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >> > >> >>The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >> >>This included all of the infrastructure required. >> >>The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >> >>has to do that work. >> > >> > >> > It also includes the requirement that you think 6 is 3. >> > >> > BAH maths is BAD maths. >> > >> > It also presumes that Szil?rd, Teller, Einstein and Oppenheimer, >> > had no knowledge before they started working on the projects. >> >> Why didn't you simply include the entire history of mankind >> and start with "Adam" then" >> >> Einstein *never* worked on the bomb project. His input was >> limited to sending a letter at Szilard's request. >> >> The rest of them, including the important work done by >> Wheeler's group at Princeton and Bohr, started with the >> Manhattan Project. The problems to be solved were not >> whether or not a bomb could work, but actually making it >> work, and a contingent trying to figure out whether or not >> once started a chain reaction wouldn't extend to the entire >> planet. >> >> > Weird, as Szil?rd was researching the matter at about the same >> > time as the Erm?chtigungsgesetz was kicking in (but not publishing >> > his work for that very reason). >> >> Szilard and others were trying to keep up with what the Germans >> were doing in their nuclear program. We sent a mission to >> destroy Germany's heavy water facility in Norway. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_heavy_water_sabotage >> >> > BAH history is BAD history. >> >> She's accurate with her time scale of 3 years. And her point >> is also correct that any country with decent math, science and >> technology can duplicate the effort in ~3 years, perhaps less, >> by mounting an effort much smaller than the Manhattan Project >> was given the wealth of knowledge in the public domain. > >The big problem is making enough fissile material. A huge effort was required to >make enough for the 3 bombs the USA exploded before the end of WW2. > That was just over 100 Lbs of first generation weak grade material. NOW, we can do it with less weight, and much more responsive media. |