Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 1 Feb 2007 16:22 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epsoo9$8qk_016(a)s807.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <epo483$kra$1(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: <snip> >> >>What part of "not having an atomic bomb for quite some years" do you not >>understand? > > The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. > This included all of the infrastructure required. > The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody > has to do that work. > > Why does everybody assume that countries have to take longer to > assemble a bomb? > Interesting. Before we even begin to think about this new question, are you saying (now) that Iran has a competent industrialised system which is capable of the manufacturing required?
From: T Wake on 1 Feb 2007 16:23 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epsosp$8qk_017(a)s807.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <45BF7A40.71A37BB3(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>> >Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>unsettled wrote: >>> >>> Eeyore wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > Attacking Iran would really let the genie out of the bottle. >>> >>> >>> >>> Or contain it. >>> >> >>> >>It makes as much sense as attacking a wasp's nest with a heavy stick. >>> >>In >>> >>front of other wasps ! >>> > >>> >I'd say less. Iran will fall out of the hand of the extremists in the >>> >next 20 or so years if left alone. With Bush's help, they will >>> >maintain >>> >control for much longer than that. >>> >>> The West doesn't have 20 years. >> >>Says who apart from you? > > Anybody who can think. >> >> >>> What part of "using an atom bomb in a few years" do you not understand? >> >>They don't have a bomb now nor will they have one in a 'few years'. >> >>Iran clearly wants one not for offensive use ( that would be insane ) > > Your assumption is 100% wrong. It will fatal to you. It is interesting that you make the same threats as fundamentalist extremists.
From: unsettled on 1 Feb 2007 16:26 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:epsoo9$8qk_016(a)s807.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>In article <epo483$kra$1(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: > > <snip> > >>>What part of "not having an atomic bomb for quite some years" do you not >>>understand? >> >>The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >>This included all of the infrastructure required. >>The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >>has to do that work. >> >>Why does everybody assume that countries have to take longer to >>assemble a bomb? >> > > > Interesting. Before we even begin to think about this new question, are you > saying (now) that Iran has a competent industrialised system which is > capable of the manufacturing required? People are the critical factor for this. They have a good number that were "made in the USA" by our universities.
From: unsettled on 1 Feb 2007 16:27 T Wake wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:epsosp$8qk_017(a)s807.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>In article <45BF7A40.71A37BB3(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>>kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>> >>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>unsettled wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Eeyore wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Attacking Iran would really let the genie out of the bottle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Or contain it. >>>>>> >>>>>>It makes as much sense as attacking a wasp's nest with a heavy stick. >>>>>>In >>>>>>front of other wasps ! >>>>> >>>>>I'd say less. Iran will fall out of the hand of the extremists in the >>>>>next 20 or so years if left alone. With Bush's help, they will >>>>>maintain >>>>>control for much longer than that. >>>> >>>>The West doesn't have 20 years. >>> >>>Says who apart from you? >> >>Anybody who can think. >> >>> >>>>What part of "using an atom bomb in a few years" do you not understand? >>> >>>They don't have a bomb now nor will they have one in a 'few years'. >>> >>>Iran clearly wants one not for offensive use ( that would be insane ) >> >>Your assumption is 100% wrong. It will fatal to you. > > > It is interesting that you make the same threats as fundamentalist > extremists. Nope. Fundies say, "We will kill you" while BAH is saying, "They will kill you".
From: Phil Carmody on 1 Feb 2007 16:34
unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > This is stupidity. If you really want the origin of the > A bomb you'd have to go back at least to 1905 and > Einstein's paper. Eisntein wasn't in the US in 1905. The first point raised was that of US research into nuclear weapons. > However, nobody in the US was formally researching "making a > bomb" till the Manhattan project so far as I know. You are wrong. You know very little. All that became declassified a decade ago. It all started in 1939. I keep saying this but your clue-resistance is just too strong. I don't believe you'll ever learn to tell the truth from falsity. Stick with BAH, you'll be happy with her. [SNIP - stuff that unambiguously falsifies what you've said above - God you're stupid. Foot hurt much?] Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./. |