Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: unsettled on 2 Feb 2007 09:08 Eeyore wrote: > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> >>>> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>What part of "not having an atomic bomb for quite some years" do you not >>>>>understand? >>>> >>>>The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >>>>This included all of the infrastructure required. >>>>The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >>>>has to do that work. >>>> >>>>Why does everybody assume that countries have to take longer to >>>>assemble a bomb? >>>> >>> >>>Interesting. Before we even begin to think about this new question, are you >>>saying (now) that Iran has a competent industrialised system which is >>>capable of the manufacturing required? >> >>I think it's a shame that they are pouring their resources into >>bomb manufacturing rather than more useful stuff. The more >>useful stuff would have a side effect of acquiring the power and >>world respect that Iran wants. > > > All of which completely fails to address the question asked of you. LOL, she answered it better than you have the capacity to understand.
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Feb 2007 09:04 In article <8e65s297p2fs3tfodc3mk1rmqu2phstukv(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Feb 07 12:46:52 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>It isn't the burners. It is the computer board in the stove that >>is bad. > > The stove has a clock, a cooking timer, and maybe some thermal probe >monitoring ports. That isn't a computer. It has one board. > >>> If you want good AM reception, you need a good loop antenna. That >>>will keep the reception constant. Otherwise you have a serious issue >>>with your house wiring. >> >>I dismissed the wiring because no other object plugged does >>this. > > The stove is not like ANY of the objects you describe. You have no >AC powered object in the house that is wired like, or gets its power >from the same branch... as the stove. It has its own SEPERATE AC >run. > > So you didn't even get that right. So, if it's on its own circuit, how can the stove affect the wiring of the plug of the radio? /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Feb 2007 09:05 In article <a0629$45c29c9e$49ecf9f$6118(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >MassiveProng wrote: > >> On Thu, 01 Feb 07 12:46:52 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >> >>>It isn't the burners. It is the computer board in the stove that >>>is bad. >> >> >> The stove has a clock, a cooking timer, and maybe some thermal probe >> monitoring ports. That isn't a computer. >> >> >>>> If you want good AM reception, you need a good loop antenna. That >>>>will keep the reception constant. Otherwise you have a serious issue >>>>with your house wiring. >>> >>>I dismissed the wiring because no other object plugged does >>>this. >> >> >> The stove is not like ANY of the objects you describe. You have no >> AC powered object in the house that is wired like, or gets its power >> from the same branch... as the stove. It has its own SEPERATE AC >> run. >> >> So you didn't even get that right. > >Might be a gas stove, dumbbell. It's an electric stove. >They're plugged into regular >branch circuits. > >Here's one with an embedded computer: > >http://www.ajmadison.com/cgi-bin/ajmadison/AGR5725RD.html Everything has a damned computer these days. /BAH
From: unsettled on 2 Feb 2007 09:16 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <a0629$45c29c9e$49ecf9f$6118(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > >>MassiveProng wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 01 Feb 07 12:46:52 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >>> >>> >>> >>>>It isn't the burners. It is the computer board in the stove that >>>>is bad. >>> >>> >>> The stove has a clock, a cooking timer, and maybe some thermal probe >>>monitoring ports. That isn't a computer. >>> >>> >>> >>>>>If you want good AM reception, you need a good loop antenna. That >>>>>will keep the reception constant. Otherwise you have a serious issue >>>>>with your house wiring. >>>> >>>>I dismissed the wiring because no other object plugged does >>>>this. >>> >>> >>> The stove is not like ANY of the objects you describe. You have no >>>AC powered object in the house that is wired like, or gets its power >>>from the same branch... as the stove. It has its own SEPERATE AC >>>run. >>> >>> So you didn't even get that right. >> >>Might be a gas stove, dumbbell. > > > It's an electric stove. Your hands aren't all that weak then, unplugging a NEMA 10-50 or equivalent requires some strength especially considering the cord usually comes out of the plug at a right angle. >>They're plugged into regular >>branch circuits. >> >>Here's one with an embedded computer: >> >>http://www.ajmadison.com/cgi-bin/ajmadison/AGR5725RD.html > > > Everything has a damned computer these days. > > /BAH >
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Feb 2007 09:14
In article <45C1FCA1.837E5319(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >> > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading. >> >>> >> >>> Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get >> >>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete. >> >> >> >>No wonder my stove doesn't work. >> > >> > It is your brain that isn't working. >> >> Most devices these days are in warm start mode. Instead >> of measuring before and after power-on, the tests need >> to measure before and after _plug-in_. > >Nothing is measured when it isn't plugged in ! Sigh! You can't see the bug in establishing the background noise base? Hint. I get the problem with the stove the moment when I plug it into the pigtail. I don't have to turn it on. /BAH |