Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Feb 2007 09:27 In article <MPG.202bd1a41d55d844989f4b(a)news.individual.net>, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >In article <45C2032F.F3336213(a)hotmail.com>, >rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >> >> >> unsettled wrote: >> >> > Eeyore wrote: >> > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >>>>MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >> > >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>You don't need an anechoic chamber btw. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments? >> > >>>>>>Or don't you need numbers anymore? >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get >> > >>>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete. >> > >>>> >> > >>>>Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw. >> > >>> >> > >>>Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ? >> > >> >> > >>The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading. >> > > >> > > >> > > That's what "device off" MEANS ! >> > > >> > > Good Lord ! How daft are you ? >> > >> > LOL >> > >> > These days "device off" isn't really off. >> >> It is when the power cord isn't plugged in you cretin. > >Dumb donkey, that's what "unplugged" means. Wow, you are dense! But the real problem is that MP always says this incorrectly. And he supposedly does work in the biz. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Feb 2007 09:28 In article <614ca$45c22694$4fe74a9$29499(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >Eeyore wrote: > >> >> krw wrote: >> >> >>>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>> >>>>unsettled wrote: >>>> >>>>>Eeyore wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>You don't need an anechoic chamber btw. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>How do you measure the EMF in "noisy" environments? >>>>>>>>>>>Or don't you need numbers anymore? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Device off, sensors read baseline noise reading. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Device on, sensors read local differential. Extrapolations get >>>>>>>>>>made, figures get arrived at. Task complete. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Your test has a big huge unfixable flaw. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on that assertion ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The device has to be unplugged to get the baseline reading. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>That's what "device off" MEANS ! >>>>>> >>>>>>Good Lord ! How daft are you ? >>>>> >>>>>LOL >>>>> >>>>>These days "device off" isn't really off. >>>> >>>>It is when the power cord isn't plugged in you cretin. >>> >>>Dumb donkey, that's what "unplugged" means. Wow, you are dense! >> >> >> The standards do not use the word 'unplugged'. > >What word meaning unplugged do you find in your standards then? According to MP, the specs say 'power off'. Power is never off unless not-plugged-in in these days of computer boards. /BAH
From: Ken Smith on 2 Feb 2007 09:41 In article <45C343D3.2D898DB7(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: [....] >> Was everybody allowed to out and shoot A rabbit for their dinner? >> That means that you all had guns. I thought you were a gunless >> society and that hunting was exclusive to royalty? > >You don't need a gun to catch rabbit. Typical American thinking. Some ppl do use >air rifles to do the job but it's not essential if you have dogs or a net. Snaring rabbits is far more effective. > >Graham > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Feb 2007 09:36 In article <45C1FDBD.F50CD089(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Note that a tech is paid to have tunnel vision. > >Not today there aren't. ROTFLMAO. You do realize that a tech, with tunnel vision, would write that sentence. > /BAH
From: T Wake on 2 Feb 2007 09:44
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epvc02$8qk_012(a)s893.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <877iv1n7xs.fsf(a)nonospaz.fatphil.org>, > Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >>> The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >>> This included all of the infrastructure required. >>> The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >>> has to do that work. >> >>It also includes the requirement that you think 6 is 3. >> >>BAH maths is BAD maths. >> >>It also presumes that Szil�rd, Teller, Einstein and Oppenheimer, >>had no knowledge before they started working on the projects. >>Weird, as Szil�rd was researching the matter at about the same >>time as the Erm�chtigungsgesetz was kicking in (but not publishing >>his work for that very reason). >> >>BAH history is BAD history. > > There is a huge difference between theory and playing in the labs > and putting something into production. > > With the bomb, both were happening at the same time. It's still > an amazing managment effort. Unfortunately, it takes war > to get everybody to aim at the same goal. |