Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 2 Feb 2007 09:50 In article <45C1F8B1.BAB6CB77(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Pay attention to what happened in Boston yesterday; especially >> follow what happens after this and what the critics are saying >> and what these critics don't say. One thing you need to know >> is that the mayor of Boston is the only politician here who >> is taking the warnings of 9/11 seriously. > >Would you care to explain for us who don't live there >what it is that happened in Boston ? It's too long to explain. Magic incantations are: gorilla marketing, Turner Broadcasting; the Cartoon channel and some movie about hair (I haven't figured this one out yet); Boston temporarily shut down. /BAH
From: T Wake on 2 Feb 2007 10:02 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epvd0i$8qk_016(a)s893.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <fbc4$45c25af0$4fe752c$2080(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>T Wake wrote: >> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:epsoo9$8qk_016(a)s807.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> >>>>In article <epo483$kra$1(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, >>>> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>>>What part of "not having an atomic bomb for quite some years" do you >>>>>not >>>>>understand? >>>> >>>>The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >>>>This included all of the infrastructure required. >>>>The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >>>>has to do that work. >>>> >>>>Why does everybody assume that countries have to take longer to >>>>assemble a bomb? >>>> >>> >>> >>> Interesting. Before we even begin to think about this new question, are >>> you >>> saying (now) that Iran has a competent industrialised system which is >>> capable of the manufacturing required? >> >> >>People are the critical factor for this. They have a good >>number that were "made in the USA" by our universities. > > You will need to pay attention at the hidden assumptions > of "european thinking" in that these peoples are uneducated > and primitive. Wow, that really was off the scale on my irony meter. I need a new one. > Some days, I think this is why Europe is sitting on their > twiddling thumbs when they're dealing with Iran's bomb making > intentions. Amazing. Europe is not "twiddling their thumbs." > I always talk myself out of this thought because > nobody could be that stupid. [You don't have to say it, Mati.] Blimey, that was a close call for the irony meter. Nearly two with one post.
From: T Wake on 2 Feb 2007 10:03 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epvcqt$8qk_015(a)s893.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <_dGdneNSZp2dx1_YRVnyhAA(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:epsoo9$8qk_016(a)s807.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <epo483$kra$1(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, >>> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >><snip> >>>> >>>>What part of "not having an atomic bomb for quite some years" do you not >>>>understand? >>> >>> The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >>> This included all of the infrastructure required. >>> The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >>> has to do that work. >>> >>> Why does everybody assume that countries have to take longer to >>> assemble a bomb? >>> >> >>Interesting. Before we even begin to think about this new question, are >>you >>saying (now) that Iran has a competent industrialised system which is >>capable of the manufacturing required? > > I think it's a shame that they are pouring their resources into > bomb manufacturing rather than more useful stuff. The more > useful stuff would have a side effect of acquiring the power and > world respect that Iran wants. > I am not sure how that answered the question. Do you now say Iran is capable of acting like a fully industrialised nation and "making things?" We can argue about how much of their resources are going where another time.
From: T Wake on 2 Feb 2007 10:04 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:88371$45c345d4$49ecf7f$10679(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > Eeyore wrote: >> >> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> >>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> >>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>>> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>What part of "not having an atomic bomb for quite some years" do you >>>>>>not >>>>>>understand? >>>>> >>>>>The US started with no knowledge and built bombs within 3 years. >>>>>This included all of the infrastructure required. >>>>>The knowledge has been around for five decades so nobody >>>>>has to do that work. >>>>> >>>>>Why does everybody assume that countries have to take longer to >>>>>assemble a bomb? >>>>> >>>> >>>>Interesting. Before we even begin to think about this new question, are >>>>you >>>>saying (now) that Iran has a competent industrialised system which is >>>>capable of the manufacturing required? >>> >>>I think it's a shame that they are pouring their resources into >>>bomb manufacturing rather than more useful stuff. The more >>>useful stuff would have a side effect of acquiring the power and >>>world respect that Iran wants. >> >> >> All of which completely fails to address the question asked of you. > > LOL, she answered it better than you have the capacity > to understand. So then, did you understand her answer to be "yes" or "no?"
From: T Wake on 2 Feb 2007 10:05
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:epvdd1$8qk_017(a)s893.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <1fc$45c2793b$4fe7468$4852(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>T Wake wrote: >> >>> "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >>> news:51fba$45c25b43$4fe752c$2080(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >>> >>>>T Wake wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:epsosp$8qk_017(a)s807.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>In article <45BF7A40.71A37BB3(a)hotmail.com>, >>>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>unsettled wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Eeyore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Attacking Iran would really let the genie out of the bottle. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Or contain it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>It makes as much sense as attacking a wasp's nest with a heavy >>>>>>>>>>stick. >>>>>>>>>>In >>>>>>>>>>front of other wasps ! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I'd say less. Iran will fall out of the hand of the extremists in >>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>next 20 or so years if left alone. With Bush's help, they will >>>>>>>>>maintain >>>>>>>>>control for much longer than that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The West doesn't have 20 years. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Says who apart from you? >>>>>> >>>>>>Anybody who can think. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>What part of "using an atom bomb in a few years" do you not >>>>>>>>understand? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>They don't have a bomb now nor will they have one in a 'few years'. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Iran clearly wants one not for offensive use ( that would be insane ) >>>>>> >>>>>>Your assumption is 100% wrong. It will fatal to you. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>It is interesting that you make the same threats as fundamentalist >>>>>extremists. >>>> >>>>Nope. Fundies say, "We will kill you" while BAH is saying, >>>>"They will kill you". >>> >>> >>> She is saying the beliefs of people in the west will be fatal to [us]. >>> Sounds remarkably like the fundamentalists. They even agree on who will >>> be >>> the instrument of the deaths. >> >>I don't find this unusual. She believes what they >>say, you don't. >> >>> Just to be clear, on my PC her post reads "Your assumption is 100% >>> wrong. >>> It will fatal to you." >> >>> I have mentally inserted the [be] because I thought it was a given. >> >>> Now if she meant, "your assumption is 100% wrong, the fundamentalists >>> will >>> kill you" why didn't she say that? >> >>LOL, you're asking me? > > Gentlemen, it takes long and arduous work to make each sentence > self-contained. > >> Part of the problem is she doesn't >>always communicate very well while sometimes she's completely >>clear in what she wants understood. Having lived in environments >>of the sort she appears to have spent her life in I suppose >>I generally understand the essentials she's trying to get across >>based on my experiences with people much like her, sometimes >>don't care about the specifics if I don't understand them, and >>don't often get excited about her posts in general. > > I've been told that I was very lucky to work in the place > I did. I didn't have to explain very much; genius has > a way to figure things out without wasting a lot of time > dotting eyes and crossing tees. > >> >>In any event, she's not so "unusual" to me as she appears to be >>to you. I suppose that sort of thing can be frustrating. > > Oh, TWake isn't frustrated about that. Something we agree on. |