Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 3 Feb 2007 12:27 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: > > > >What is clear is that any improvised device showing > >batteries and wires is presently suspicious to the > >police. That's got the potential to shut down cities > >and airports. Leaving a large ghetto blaster at Logan > >Airport would probably shut down the building it was > >found in. > > Did the plane that fell on Scotland have a radio filled > with explosive? In baggage in the hold IIRC. What's your point ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Feb 2007 12:31 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> >Did you know that health actually improved during the period of rationing > >> >btw ? > >> > >> Do those stats exclude everybody who died from bombs and bullets? > > > >I said *health*. Do you not understand ? > > Yes. I understood. I also understand that stats can be misinterpreted. > You moved a large part of your population from the cities to the > countryside. Not that large a part actually. > That might also have more to do with *health* than > your implication that a government controlling your food purchasing > creates healthier conditions. Given that it wasn't a large part of the population at all I don't agree. Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Feb 2007 12:32 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> So, if it's on its own circuit, how can the stove affect the > >> >> wiring of the plug of the radio? > >> > > >> >You clearly don't understand how RF energy propagates. It doesn't matter > >> >which circuit it's on. > >> > >> Exactly. And it can't be the house wiring. > > > >Of course it can be. > > Then explain why I did have the same effects with the stove > that was replaced. Which stove is this now ? Was it the same model ? Did it also have a microprocessor in it ? Graham
From: Phil Carmody on 3 Feb 2007 12:33 unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > Phil Carmody wrote: > > > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> writes: > > > >>Phil Carmody wrote: > >> > >>>mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu writes: > >>> > >>>>Ahh, so that's why James Watt had to wait for thermodynamics before > >>>>developing his steam engine. > >>> > >>>That straw man ought to be below someone posting from a .edu address. > >>>If it expands, it will pushes, and if we can trap it so it > >>>can only push in one direction, and we can use part of that > >>>push to cause the mechanism to reset is a _theory_. It does not > >>>require knowledge of the laws of thermodynamics. > >>>So your straw man is self-quenching - congratulations. > >>>And, just for reference, you're history is incorrect, it wasn't > >>>Watt. Hmmm, .edu's ain't what they used to be. > >> > >>The only person who developed Watt's engine was, > >>Ta Da! Watt > >> > >>Watt's engine relied on an outboard condenser. > >>Ta Da! Thermodynamics! > > God, you're stupid. It also relied on the quantum electrodynamics > > and strong nuclear force. That is irrelevant. One does not need an > > inverse square law theory of gravity to realise that the higher you > > aim your arrow, the further it goes. You model the behaviour, > > you prove your model. The Greeks had already modeled the motive > > power of steam. Watt is possibly the most commonly over-credited > > person in history. > > Once again talking out of both sides of your mouth. > You're the clown who, just a few posts back, claimed > first the theory, then the practice. Yes. The Ancient Greeks recognised that boiling water generates pressure, theory, and then build something to verify and exploit this, practice. > Now, caught out you've completely reversed your > argument while continuing with insults to cover > your lack of knowledge and logic. As I have just indicated, there is no reversal. The only reversal must be in the wiring of your axons. > You've time and again demonstrated you're not worth > the clock cycles it takes to download. I've got to admit, if I were you I wouldn't download those posts, given that you know that they will contain things that rip your unsubstantiated nonsense to shreds. But maybe you're a masochist. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
From: Eeyore on 3 Feb 2007 12:35
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Why is it that so many Americans seem to believe in perpetual > >> >> >> >> motion devices / free energy / cars that run on water btw ? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Habishi isn't American. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> And he got his training in England. > >> >> > > >> >> >Do you have any evidence for this ? > >> >> > >> >> He said so. > >> > > >> >When was this ? > >> > > >> > >> Best estimate is about two years before Franz Heymann died. > > > >You talk in riddles as ever. > > > >I suppose it was too much to expect you to name a year and some context ? > > I gave you an estimate of the year. That's totally meaningless to someone who doesn't know Franz Heymann. Did that not occur to you ? > Franz and I were trying to get habshi to test his ideas. As if he would ever do that ! > That's when habshi told where he went to school. I can't recall the name of > the school-- > Cambridge is what pops up but I can't say if that's the right one. There's a Cambridge Mass too. Graham |