Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 3 Feb 2007 13:23 On Sat, 03 Feb 07 12:11:28 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <9c9e$45c38013$4fe768e$12122(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, > unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>Eeyore wrote: >>> >>> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>They [Muslims] can't even buy >>>>>>shoes unless the shoe has been approved by the clerics (I think >>>>>>those are the people who do this work). >>>>> >>>>>Really? I can find no example of this being true. Can you support the >claim >>>>>that Islam dictates what shoes people can wear? >>>> >>>>Of the three Abraham-based religions, only Christianity doesn't >>>>have rules about living styles. >>> >>> >>> More obfuscation. Did you take a course in not answering the question btw ? >>> >>> Can you support the claim that Islam dictates what shoes people can wear ? >>> >>> Graham >>> >>http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/072.sbt.html > >Thank you. I can't get out today to check the blurb; but I'll trust >your judgement. > >/BAH Isn't this where we're all supposed to say "BAHahahahahahahahahah!"? You sit in front of that thing ALL DAY. I doubt there are any days where you get out. Are your groceries delivered?
From: MassiveProng on 3 Feb 2007 13:40 On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:01:09 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> Gave us: >(sometimes an immersing >experience) to all sorts of things these clowns haven't >even dreamed of. They don't get, even marginally, what >"testing" is about. I worked in infrared thermometry twenty years ago. I am building an 800 plus channel simulator right now that will get used in the world's largest anechoic chamber ever built, and I doubt you even know where it is located. I have some of my designs in use right now on the Space Shuttle program that monitor launch pad protected zone areas for burn through from 1000' away on EVERY launch since '87. In the days before Infrared imagers were proliferant I made the only device that power engineers used in the field for determining insulator temperatures and transformer temperatures without the need for being at the insulator site on the tower, providing accurate thermal information from over 100' away. It had a 4" tube, and a gold mirror, and was NIST traceable for accuracy. I have made a 15kV power supply that was intended for direct human contact in a medical device, and had to be fully characterized and have shutdown circuitry incorporated into it, and had very stringent operational parameters it had to fall into. I took it from concept to design to proto and finished product through three years of development. One could fit 5 of them in a pack of cigarettes, and they are 100% controlled for voltage and current as well as trigger point for the shutdown. I think I know the fullest extent of what ""testing" is about". You're still an idiot.
From: MassiveProng on 3 Feb 2007 13:40 On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:01:09 -0600, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> Gave us: >MP wouldn't have lasted an hour in those days before >he was shown the door. You're an idiot.
From: MassiveProng on 3 Feb 2007 13:52 On Sat, 03 Feb 07 13:26:22 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <ksp7s25msr8da10g2ld0dd8n6qfe4jiq9t(a)4ax.com>, > MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>On Fri, 02 Feb 07 15:20:42 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >>>In article <45C3495D.93DE0786(a)hotmail.com>, >>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, if it's on its own circuit, how can the stove affect the >>>>> wiring of the plug of the radio? >>>> >>>>You clearly don't understand how RF energy propagates. It doesn't matter >>>which >>>>circuit it's on. >>> >>>Exactly. And it can't be the house wiring. >> >> You're an idiot. You proved that when you stated that you are >>plugging a stove into a pigtail. > >So what do you call it? > This is not semantics, twit. The stove plugs directly into the outlet. Anything else is illegal and you would be liable were someone to get hurt. If you are placing a "pigtail" between the stove cord and the outlet, then it is YOU that is causing the problem. Both the electrical problem and a potential for a electrical shock hazard problem. What idiot raised you to think that you could plug a high power AC device in with a pigtail between the device and the outlet?
From: MassiveProng on 3 Feb 2007 14:02
On Sat, 03 Feb 07 13:46:02 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <mgo7s21ckoee6om4d5c05vj9rr8pjfi78h(a)4ax.com>, > MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>On Fri, 02 Feb 07 14:04:45 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >> >>>In article <8e65s297p2fs3tfodc3mk1rmqu2phstukv(a)4ax.com>, >>> MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>>>On Thu, 01 Feb 07 12:46:52 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >>>> >>>>>It isn't the burners. It is the computer board in the stove that >>>>>is bad. >>>> >>>> The stove has a clock, a cooking timer, and maybe some thermal probe >>>>monitoring ports. That isn't a computer. >>> >>>It has one board. >> >> >> Which incorporates all the items I listed above. Being a single >>board STILL does NOT make it a computer. >> >> Nice attempt at a sidestep, though. > >You have the term "computer" and "computer system" confused. >They are not equivalent terms. > >/BAH A controller board that incorporates all the sensors mentioned and the timers and clock, are not a computer, NOR are they a computer system. It is a micro-controller, nothing more. You sit in front of a dumb (or smart) terminal connected to a remote computer. Those are two elements of a computer system. Embedded micro-controller circuitry for hardware is NOT a computer. No calculations have to be made. Nothing got computed. Not a computer. Try again, please. Just so you know, the definition put up by the unsettledTard is not correct either. |