From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 17:13 Kurt Ullman wrote: > "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > > "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > > > > >> > Where did the current terrorism financing and materials come > > >> > from? > > >> > > >> From the USA (oil). Unlike most every other conflict, the US is paying > > >> for > > >> both sides in this one. > > > > > > ...and only the USA buys middle east oil? You are as ignorant as > > > the stuffed donkey. > > > > Right. Sure. If the US wasn't importing oil to feed its ridiculous fleet of > > inefficient cars what would happen to world prices and hence the flow of > > money to the Middle East? > > Not much since it would largely be gobbled by China and India > among others. How would that happen ? Is this some kind of perverse excuse for inefficiency ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 17:15 Kurt Ullman wrote: > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > And again, I'll ask, is there nothing in your worldview but "nuke 'em all" > > and "capitulate". Must really suck to live in such a black-and-white world. > > > You suggested that we stop giving them reasons to hate us. From their > own rhetoric and statements, the only way we are going to get that > subset that hates to stop is to capitulate. Period. No it isn't. Why do you think that ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 17:17 John Fields wrote: > My reference to not speaking English as a first language was a > euphemism for being conquered, which was related to an earlier post > by Graham stating that had the US not become involved in WW2, > England and Germany might have teamed up to fight Russia after > Germany double-crossed Russia. In my opinion that would have been > suicide for England, as depleted as it would have been, when Russia > came rolling in to get Germany. It wouldn't just have been Britain and Germany you clot ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 17:20 John Larkin wrote: > John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > > >England, the US, and every other country in the world that has had > >to fight for its existence was founded on terrorism or caused to > >come into existence because of terrorism. > > How was the US founded on terrorism? I've read that not a single > civilian was executed in the US Revolutionary War. The only people > that were shot at were British soldiers and their indian allies. There > were certainly no bombs planted in mathetplaces. Rubbish. You guys executed a number of loyalists. Graham
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 17:20
Kurt Ullman wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > Ken Smith wrote: > > > T Wake <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > > > > > >A surprisingly small number of Islamic extremists are actually willing to > > > >die for their cause you know? > > > > > > Their belief system encourages it with promices of virgins etc > > > > It's a *distorted* version of their 'belief system' that does that. Don't > > blame Islam. > > > It is a "distorted" version of Islam. It is a perfect version of their > belief system. Wrong. It's nothing of the sort. Graham |