Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Kurt Ullman on 5 Oct 2006 17:53 In article <p_OdnTk5wevL47jYnZ2dnUVZ8tCdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:452571FE.EB618D6(a)earthlink.net... > >T Wake wrote: > >> > >> Really? What did Teacher set as the victory condition? This is USENET, > >> despite all the hard talk and macho strutting all people are doing is > >> typing > >> words. How can any one win or lose a "tauntfight" like that? > > > > > > Endurance. > > > > Aha. The mad, the unemployed, the social misfits, (and so on) are the > victors then. Wonderful. You sound like you think that may be a bad thing....
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 17:55 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:452579DF.EF056AA9(a)hotmail.com... > > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > T Wake wrote: >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >> > >> >> > Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon. >> >> > >> >> > Is that what you want ? >> >> >> >> What alternative do they have? Until the Palestinians and Arabs can >> >> accept >> >> Israel's existence, Israel can not hold off on its defensive posture. >> >> >> >> Do you advocate Israel surrender? >> > >> > Many Arab nations have sorted this one out. We really do need to bash >> > the >> > Israeli and Palestinian heads together. >> >> The Palestinians have been offered the same all other Arab nation have >> been >> offered. >> >> Is there ever going to be an acceptable midde ground? > > There will *have* to be ! I'd like to think that, but there is no reason to be sure this is the case. >> > Whilst Israel continues to get a blank cheque from the USA it's not >> > going >> > to happen of course. >> >> Maybe. Hard to think of a reason why the US should abandon it's support >> of >> Israel though. > > What does the USA get out of it ? Apart from terrorist attacks ? Well, my personal feeling is that changing your foreign policy as the result of terrorist attacks is _always_ wrong. The US has recognised the right of the State of Israel to exist. Why should they stop supporting them? Supporting Israel to simply get at the Arabs is wrong, but why stop supporting an otherwise closely allied country?
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 17:56 John Fields wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >Brilliant. War really will never end. > > --- > Not as long as we have people like Graham who advocate genocide. You utter fathead. I've advocated no such thing. You have though. Graham
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 17:56 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:4525731F.88253EF2(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> Good job he could stand on you to stay clear. > > > In your dreams. > Oddly, no. It may come as a shock but you, your head and turds (or any combination) have never really played a big part in my dreams. Is this all part of your dream sequences? Do you have trouble telling reality from dream? From your yawning (and posts) it may be the case....
From: mmeron on 5 Oct 2006 17:57
In article <eg2paa$8qk_011(a)s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com writes: >In article <PsRUg.57$45.150(a)news.uchicago.edu>, > mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >>In article <4523844C.CA22EFDF(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore ><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> writes: >>> >>> >>>mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >>> >>>> In article <4522F8DE.C46161BD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore writes: >>>> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> You didn't read carefully. It is not "10% changing". It is that >>>> >> historical data indicates dramatic changes when about 10% of the >>>> >> population is *dead*. Does this make it clear? >>>> > >>>> >So, we only need to kill 100 million Muslims or so ? >>>> > >>>> I didn't say, at the moment, what we need (or need not) to do. I >>>> pointed what empirical data for past conflicts shows. Go argue with >>>> history if you don't like it. >>> >>>But you still mainatain we'd need to kill that many to have an effect ? >>> >>>Graham >>> >>Not that "we'd need" but that, as a worst case scenario, we may need. > >The oddity of this, which I cannot find in past history, is that >the extremists are already doing this to themselves. > It is not that odd. Extremists are striving for a very high degreee of coherence, in their own camp. This involves "purifying" your side from "dubious elements". Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, meron(a)cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same" |