Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 18:59 "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:kurtullman-8F239D.17525905102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx... > In article <p_OdnTk5wevL47jYnZ2dnUVZ8tCdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:452571FE.EB618D6(a)earthlink.net... >> >T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> Really? What did Teacher set as the victory condition? This is USENET, >> >> despite all the hard talk and macho strutting all people are doing is >> >> typing >> >> words. How can any one win or lose a "tauntfight" like that? >> > >> > >> > Endurance. >> > >> >> Aha. The mad, the unemployed, the social misfits, (and so on) are the >> victors then. Wonderful. > > You sound like you think that may be a bad thing.... Fair one. I may reconsider.
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 18:59 Kurt Ullman wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > Kurt Ullman wrote: > > > > What ought to be done? Why is government better able than the free > > > market (including the free market of getting donations to support > > > private research like that done by MDA, St. Judes, etc.) > > > > Because Government can prioritise according to need rather than profit. > They don't. They prioritize according to their profit, You're stupid and ignorant. Graham
From: Eeyore on 5 Oct 2006 19:00 Kurt Ullman wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Because Government can prioritise according to need rather than profit. > They don't. They prioritize according to their profit, ie, how many > votes it will get or how much to their PACs or re-election funds. > Otherwise you wouldn't have the rather strange of allocation of > resources you see sometimes at the NIH and other federal programs. Oh the USA ? That's corrupt anyway ! Just don't tar us with the same brush ( yet ). Graham
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 19:00 "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message news:oNfVg.51683$E67.16735(a)clgrps13... > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > news:OMydnTZT299zHLjYnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d(a)pipex.net... > >>> Before Hitler - no holocaust. >>> >>> After Hitler - no holocaust. >> >> Wow. Before [Insert anyone who lived between 1930 - 1945] no holocaust. >> After [same person] no holocaust. > > So you see no connection between Hitler and the holocaust? > I see a connection but the same connection can be said about many people. Your example was meant to imply that Hitler was the sole driving force for the Holocaust. This is not the case.
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 19:01
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4525881D.5CE755C8(a)hotmail.com... > > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > T Wake wrote: >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >> >> >> > The insurgent isn't automatically a terrorist. >> >> >> >> It is a viewpoint issue. Were the July train bombers in London >> >> insurgents >> >> or >> >> terrorists? >> > >> > Definitely terrorists. Not insurgents in any organised way. >> >> But they were organised. > > An organised group of 5 ? Yes. Is there a minimum number before you can become organised? Apart from that, who recruited them? Who trained them? Who equipped them? Who encouraged them? |