Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 18:16 "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:kurtullman-A0902C.17031305102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx... > In article <gZCdncvdOOR47LjYRVny2w(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > hall. >> >> The fact they all have big, sloped, foreheads and the same surname is >> suspicious to say the least :-) >> > > Aunt Mom and Uncle Dad is another dead giveaway. > If your family tree don't branch.... > Lol. They do stem from their gene puddles, that is for sure :-)
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 18:20 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:45257983.B5B9D79D(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:4524AD4F.E60318D(a)earthlink.net... >> >T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> Do Americans have a word for Bullying? >> > >> > Yes, do you have one for yellow bellied cowards? >> >> Not one word. As you can see, there were three there. I can help with >> your >> counting if you want? > > > Would you like help with reading comprehension? I didn't say "yellow > bellied cowards" was one word, I asked if you had a word that was > equivalent to it? And, as you can see, I replied we don't have _one_ word for it. You used the same words as we do in England, because you speak English. Sorry if it confused you. Do you want me to keep to single syllables in future? >> >> The post I replied to said: >> >> "Because America has the wherewithal and the will to do whatever it wants >> to, and all the little guys resent that." >> >> So can I assume by your reply that the option is force others to do as I >> say >> or be a yellow bellied coward. >> >> Honestly, this makes no sense to me. > > > Poor comprehension will do that to you. > Yeah, true. You still make no sense and have little in the way of rebuttal other than appeals to ridicule or logical fallacies. Keep trying though. You will get there eventually.
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 18:22 "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:kurtullman-C6BC2D.15184105102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx... > In article <mgcVg.8914$GR.6106(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> >> >> Oh, the innumeracy. At the rate that they're doing that, it will take >> >> at >> >> least an order of magnitude longer than all of recorded human history >> >> to >> >> reach the stated endpoint. In the meantime, how about if we stop >> >> giving >> >> them reasons to do so? >> >> >> > So, we just all capitulate and become Muslim states? >> >> And again, I'll ask, is there nothing in your worldview but "nuke 'em >> all" >> and "capitulate". Must really suck to live in such a black-and-white >> world. >> > You suggested that we stop giving them reasons to hate us. From their > own rhetoric and statements, the only way we are going to get that > subset that hates to stop is to capitulate. Period. There is plenty in > my world view between the two, but I have seen nothin' to indicate there > is anything else in THEIR world view. I don't want to nuke 'em all. > Just light up those who are actively trying to kill me. This creates an interesting problem. How many who aren't actively trying to kill you are you prepared to kill to ensure those who are get caught? How far down the line do they have to go to be "actively trying to kill" you? Is it the point they aim a gun at _you_ or is it the point they stand on a box in a foreign country and espouse violence toward the US?
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 18:24 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:452560C4.17296381(a)hotmail.com... > > > Kurt Ullman wrote: > >> So, we just all capitulate and become Muslim states? > > Since when was that an option ? It has always been an option. It will always be an option. Is is the option with the highest chance of sucess for those who think life is more important than way of life. > You really shouldn't give so much credence to what a few thousand ppl say > they > want. Well, that is the democratic process for you.
From: Kurt Ullman on 5 Oct 2006 18:27
In article <esidnW_v7dZdGLjYRVnyiQ(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > How far down the line do they have to go to be "actively trying to kill" > you? Is it the point they aim a gun at _you_ or is it the point they stand > on a box in a foreign country and espouse violence toward the US? Yes. As long as they have a method to follow through on the violence. You can also actively try to kill me by doing things other than aim a gun at me. Although, as was mentioned earlier, I have never been a big exponent of not targeting the generals. Think wars would stop a lot quicker if the generals were also targets along with the poor grunt. |