Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Homer J Simpson on 5 Oct 2006 19:12 "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message news:3vudnaMhu8Q2EbjYnZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d(a)pipex.net... > God Bless Fundamentalists..... Stupid ideas appeal to stupid people.
From: Homer J Simpson on 5 Oct 2006 19:12 "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message news:FbOdnVmGg9Q_E7jYnZ2dnUVZ8qudnZ2d(a)pipex.net... >> So you see no connection between Hitler and the holocaust? >> > > I see a connection but the same connection can be said about many people. > Your example was meant to imply that Hitler was the sole driving force for > the Holocaust. This is not the case. It appears to have moved Germany from desire to action.
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 19:14 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45258C8B.F3B9AF68(a)hotmail.com... > > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > John Fields wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >In any case they'd have to overthrow EU and UK law first. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> No big deal. You've never heard of martial law? >> > >> > Martial Law can only be imposed by a conquering army or whatever. >> >> Not true. Already in the UK the government have floated the idea of using >> soldiers to provide police (RMP) in Garrison towns. >> >> The surveillance team which assisted the shooting of the Brazillian were >> partly military. >> >> Soldiers and AFVs have deployed to Heathrow as security. > > I don't recall any mention of Martial Law there. > There wasn't, however as the rest of my post said it is the thin end of the wedge. Currently there is perfect, legitimate, policy for the use of Military Aid to the Civil Power where soldiers can be deployed to enforce government legislation. The fact it hasn't been used in that capacity doesn't mean it isn't there. Military Police patrolling civilian towns is not normal... The fact the idea was even suggested is shocking and I am ex-Army.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 5 Oct 2006 19:14 T Wake wrote: > > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:TpfVg.8964$GR.4115(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... > > > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message > > news:z8KdnXZUI_tF5rjYRVny2Q(a)pipex.net... > >> > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > >> news:_kdVg.8930$GR.1926(a)newssvr29.news.prodigy.net... > >>> > >>> "Keith" <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote in message > >>> news:MPG.1f8ef7a64499f172989d95(a)News.Individual.NET... > >> > >>>> Nope. not good enough. If the call is suspect it can't wait a > >>>> "certain number of hours". The value is gone by the time they can > >>>> call a FISA judge. > >>> > >>> No, nice try at a strawman, but it has nothing to do with what I'm > >>> saying and what is provided for in FISA. > >> > >> Strawman or not, the time sensitive nature of the intelligence still is > >> not a strong enough argument for most cases. > > > > You better believe it is in this case. > > Why? > > What situation can the intelligence be so vital that the law enforcement > agency know it is going to be said but dont have time to advance request a > warrant? > > > However, it's provided for in FISA. > > Not really relevant to me, as your country feels it can intercept my > communications at its leisure. Then don't call anyone in the United States. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: T Wake on 5 Oct 2006 19:15
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:45258DFB.BBB5B87C(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> Yes. >> >> Are you struggling with the word choice? > > > I have no problems with it, but you seem to. > Really. Let us review the information. I object to being _forced_ to carry an ID card. You respond with comments about my driving licence - which is based on a _choice_ I made. Can you explain to me where _I_ have the problem understanding the word use? I cant really see it. |