From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 15:21 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:vgdci29a8p13kfhhs2i6rnm9b36duq7r72(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:06:03 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:regbi2dpkrf103e4opion58ooto1lmft2c(a)4ax.com... >> >>> It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous. >> >>Yes, I suspect it is he who is incredulous at your idiocy. I think the >>word >>you wanted is "incredible", as in "not credible". >> > > No. It was said just fine. > > Nothing you say carries any credence either. Ooh, such a big word. Did you have to look it up? Bet you had a little lie down afterwards, didn't you?
From: Daniel Mandic on 6 Oct 2006 15:23 John Fields wrote: > Try laughing at yourself; everyone else does... :-) Me not. He angles for compliments (Thanks Graham, I am honoured), strange in the first but with a good British Heart. John. You... what could I say. You are the perfect example for anti American Liberty thinking. I know the thinking (Liberty) is coming also from Indian Influence, of course ;-). But let it.... when the US is such a Big Time/s player, then account the thousand of years of their culture. No, Not sooo much.. :) just a bit. (For the first... calm down man. You cannot rule the world, but otherwise, no one is in the slightest strong enough, to capture Amerika) Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: Daniel Mandic on 6 Oct 2006 15:23 John Fields wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:27:40 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > John Fields wrote: > > > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >John Fields wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:09:50 +0100, Eeyore wrote: > > > > >> >> >Let me make this clearer. > >> >> > > >> >> >Who exactly do you mean ? > >> >> > >> >> What, you want names? > >> > > >> >That would be a start. Something more coherent than 'radical > islam' for >> >example. > > > > >> --- > >> Too bad a simple concept is so hard for you to grasp when it's > other >> than American. > > > > No. It's not a simple concept you fuckwitted simpleton. > > --- > You're the only one who seems to be struggling with it > --- > Please let this typical american phrases. > > Who are these ppl ? > > --- > Who knows? Might be your next-door neighbors, might be mine. Please let this typical american phrases. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 15:27 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eg58oe$8ss_016(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <Va9Vg.19654$Ij.16215(a)newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:eg2paa$8qk_011(a)s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> The oddity of this, which I cannot find in past history, is that >>> the extremists are already doing this to themselves. >> >>Oh, the innumeracy. At the rate that they're doing that, it will take at >>least an order of magnitude longer than all of recorded human history to >>reach the stated endpoint. In the meantime, how about if we stop giving >>them reasons to do so? > > If you had your way, everybody would convert to Islam. Sorry, where did that assumption come from? > OK. > Assume that. Since the factions are already killing each > other, what makes you think that they will stop killing and > murdering and destroying all infrastructure? The goal > is to destroy Western infrastructure. Says who? More importantly, whose goal is this? Is this _all_ "they" want to do? > This means bridges, > roads, computers, any science results and their applications, > white collar jobs, blue collar jobs, manufacturing plants, > food processing plants, etc. Do I need to think of more to > list? Well, no, but some supporting evidence of this being the "goal" of "them" would be nice.
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 15:28
<lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:KhuVg.13905$7I1.10490(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... > > then you would have to assume that that half of the group is all busy > sodomizing each other. You mean they aren't? Wow. Did I misjudge JoeBloe..... |