Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Michael A. Terrell on 6 Oct 2006 15:42 T Wake wrote: > > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:4526913C.D6CD8A9C(a)earthlink.net... > >T Wake wrote: > >> > >> Inbreeding is a terrible thing. > > > > > > Then stop doing it and let your family tree grow some real branches. > > > > Sorry, I didn't realise you held the monopoly on it. Hey, I am sure it makes > it easier for you to remember father / mothers day though. And you only need > a small house for a family get together. No wonder you want to keep it all > to yourself. Nice try. Must be some of that lowbrow british humor. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 15:43 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <452630ED.D2D922DC(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Our freedoms are under threat as a result of American stupidity. > > Now I understand you. It is not Bin Laden's fault that he > is going to kill a lot of people. Bin Laden's quite possibly dead. > It's the Americans' fault > that caused Islamic extremists to want to destroy Western > civilization. Exactly. They even say as much ! Graham
From: Michael A. Terrell on 6 Oct 2006 15:43 Daniel Mandic wrote: > > John Larkin wrote: > > > That's actually true. "American" culture, which is actually world > > culture, is the thing they fear will seduce their sons and liberate > > their daughters. As it must. > > > > John > > World culture??? bruahahaha... > > Only fostered by right-radicals. Here where I live for example.... > > Digital Freaks and so... with raunchy eye-glasses :), telling me: "You > cannot say 'Good Day'.... that's not English. Bruuahahhhaaaa. not > English, this guy was really funny :). > > Best regards, > > Daniel Mandic And you are as misguided as the demented donkey. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 15:43 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:452691FD.529EE2BD(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:4525CE02.456E30F6(a)earthlink.net... >> >T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to gather >> >> foreign >> >> intelligence. >> > >> > >> > Unless you are a terrorist, what are you worried about? >> > >> >> Interesting argument. >> >> I work in corporate security and often work for governmental >> organisations, >> will you please surrender to me all your bank records so I can check what >> transactions take place. I also want you to record your movements and >> actions at all times. >> >> I am sure, that as you are not a terrorist, you will have no qualms >> against >> this. >> >> I await the data. > > > It wouldn't do you any good. I am on a small VA pension that barely > pays the bills. Anyway, I don't have a bank account. > I think you are lying until you can prove otherwise. That notwithstanding, you've assumed I want your money - I don't, I want to reassure myself you are not a terrorist. You also need to let me know all your movements and everyone you speak to.
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 15:44
"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:o5tci294t398dvpt9014ng9l8uc1j9si20(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:28:26 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> >>"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >>news:kce8i2l54rst8l51d8ekjq7iopiiq6530l(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 19:49:49 +0100, "T Wake" >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >>>>news:8ft5i211dol6qj0uqbuo75l7bsr01uf60v(a)4ax.com... >>> >>>>> --- >>>>> Sometimes a crude allegory serves admirably in making a point >>>>> quickly. >>>>> >>>> >>>>On both sides of the debate.... >>> >>> --- >>> Yes, but often the point made by the side with the crude allegory >>> overshadows the implicit admonition against political incorrectness >>> enjoyed, silently, by the other side. >> >>Fair one and (IMHO) neither are really valid debating styles. If people >>want >>to throw insults at each other, great. I have no problem with that. >> >>> That is, if that's what you had in mind. >> >>I am not sure what I had in mind. >> >>> If it isn't, and both sides revert to crude allegory, then the >>> psycholgy underlying the symbology can get very interesting. >> >>Yes, although it does imply that both sides of the debate are somewhat >>fixated with inserting things up their own backsides.......... >> >>Interesting symbology but, based on the mental picture I have of the >>"average" person on USENET, not pleasant.... > > --- > LOL, nor was it intended to be! > > What I was alluding to was that domination might not seem to be so > bad if it occurs a little at a time. > > Anyway, I think that's what I was alluding to. Seems like that was > a long time ago and I'm starting to lose track... > USENET "debates" are entertaining though. |