From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 16:13 "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:p28di2lnbc8pq5nldct9s2c5mfan7kv8mn(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:53:49 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: >> >>> Do you personally know anyone who doesn't carry some form of >>> identification? >> >>What do you call a " form of identification " ? >> >>It's not compulsory to carry a driving licence with you in the UK and I >>don't. > > --- > What do you use for identification when you use a credit card or > cash a check? > Nothing.
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 16:12 On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:23:08 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> So, you don't carry anything else?........... >> .........An insurance card so you don't die while waiting for >> the hospital to make sure they will be paid for their services? > >You really don't know much about the UK do you ? > >Medical services are free. --- Such as they are, I've heard. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Daniel Mandic on 6 Oct 2006 16:12 T Wake wrote: > Assumption. Granted it is about 99.9% probable that without American > involvement in WWII the end would have been different and the Map of > Europe in 1945 would have looked different, but assuming that the US > were the only thing which prevented Germany destroying the UK is > unsupported. You are stupid as the night is dark. Can't you understand.... the Russian invasion... eahm., erm the german invasion to Russia was only a mislead, of thinking the Na... in Russia needs just one last proove, showing the power of the german Na.... After all, it was just a mind-blister. As you can find many Na... all over the World, right now. Russia was and is and have been always stronger than Germany, when looking to ground forward, ducking, hedge and taking line kind of War. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: John Larkin on 6 Oct 2006 16:18 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:47:07 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> The demented donkey doesn't realize that the increase in VD is mostly >> in senior citizens living in age segregated communities like "The >> Villages". > >The rate in young ppl is on the rise too. The USA has one of the very worst records on this issue. > >Graham http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=408249&in_page_id=1770 John
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 16:19
Lloyd Parker wrote: > In article > <kurtullman-C56BCA.11171106102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx>, > Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >In article <n3mci2p9ah579tq4d38b7emv85ksafipu1(a)4ax.com>, > > John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > > > >> >What do you think about the Vincennes shooting down an Iranian Airbus then > ? > >> > >> From: > >> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/3/newsid_4678000/4678707 > >> .stm > >> > >> "The USS Vincennes had tracked the plane electronically and warned > >> it to keep away. When it did not the ship fired two surface-to-air > >> missiles, at least one of which hit the airliner." > >> > >> I think the airplane's pilot should have had the good sense to heed > >> the Vincennes' warning. > > > > It is sorta the height of moral equivalancy to suggest that an > >accident that we attempted to avoid by warning the plane is anywhere > >near the same as anything else being discussed. > > Further, there is no indication the pilot (1) was monitoring the frequency > used or (2) knew they were referring to his aircraft, as it was in a standard > commercial travel lane. The Iran Air flight would be monitoring the allotted ATC frequency and have no reason to use any other. In any case the warning was addressed to "Iranian F-14" ! Graham |