From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 15:31 John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote > >> > > >> > Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon. > >> > > >> > Is that what you want ? > >> > >> What alternative do they have? Until the Palestinians and Arabs can accept > >> Israel's existence, Israel can not hold off on its defensive posture. > >> > >> Do you advocate Israel surrender? > > > >Many Arab nations have sorted this one out. We really do need to bash the > >Israeli and Palestinian heads together. > > --- > This from a person who professes not to advocate violence. Don't be so silly. It's a metaphor. > >Whilst Israel continues to get a blank cheque from the USA it's not going to > >happen of course. > > --- > Why should it? We like Israel and would like to see a peaceful > resolution to the Hatfield and McCoy problem over there but, by the > same token, if we abandon her she'll most likely be destroyed. By whom ? Israel's shown it's ability to survive attacks long before the USA got involved. > So, instead of your solution, which is throwing her to the wolves, > I'd prefer we spend as much time and money as it takes to > ,hopefully, eventually find the answer to the riddle and bring the > hostilities to an end. All the USA's support is currently doing is to prolong the agony. Graham
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 15:29 On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 02:56:51 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > Homer J Simpson wrote: >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> >> >> >> > Your American Love of Violence is once again nnoted. >> >> > >> >> > Do you think that violence is the only way to 'win an argument' ? >> >> >> >> Isn't it the message of almost all US made movies? >> > >> > Don't even get me started on US movies !!! What's the emoticon for steam >> > coming out of your ears ? >> >> Were those also more tolerable during the Clinton administration, or was it >> just our foreign policy? > >Maybe under Clinton they seemed more amusing ? --- What was amusing under Clinton was Monica Lewinsky -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 15:34 On 06 Oct 2006 02:36:31 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> wrote: >Jim Thompson wrote: > >> Sounds like you've never actually seen the US. Bye. >> >> ...Jim Thompson > > >America? Yes, fine. Many good people there, many good people there. > > >USA sounds better ;-) > > > > >Better Regards, > >Daniel Mandic > > >P.S.: United States of America even more. Although, I prefer to say >America. --- How can I get some of the drugs you're using? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 15:38 JoeBloe wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >Homer J Simpson wrote: > >> "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote > >> > >> >> 25% of world production? > >> > > >> > So you are really assuming our use is going to go to nothing? > >> > >> The US still produces quite a lot of oil. Add in Canada, Mexico and the Gulf > >> and you're close to what you need IF you had halfway fuel efficient cars. > > > >It would help even more if US diesel fuel was clean enough that modern Japanese and > >European diesel cars could run on it. The fuel efficiency of these is very good > >indeed. > > You're an idiot! > > Now you claim that we don't know how to make diesel fuel? Most US diesel is currently very 'dirty'. Only a small amount of clean diesel is currently on the US market and it only became available a couple of months ago. http://www.epa.gov/cleandiesel/ > Your US hate thing has really gotten the best of whatever you may > have once been. > > You are surely no scientist. On the contrary I'm right and you're wrong. No great surprise. Graham
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 15:38
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:4526913C.D6CD8A9C(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> Inbreeding is a terrible thing. > > > Then stop doing it and let your family tree grow some real branches. > Sorry, I didn't realise you held the monopoly on it. Hey, I am sure it makes it easier for you to remember father / mothers day though. And you only need a small house for a family get together. No wonder you want to keep it all to yourself. |