Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 16:21 John Fields wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:22:44 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >Kurt Ullman wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> As long as the Palestinians and others keep attacking Israel. > >> Israel was giving back land and moving out some areas and making moves > >> until Hizbolah began firing off rockets, etc. Same old same old. > > > >Honestly, they're as bad as each other. > > --- > How can you say that in the same sentence with "honestly"? > > Israel was working for peace by making unilateral concessions and > they were attacked preemptively for no apparent good reason. What attack was this ? Graham
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 16:21 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:4526B196.7F3BC708(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:4526913C.D6CD8A9C(a)earthlink.net... >> >T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> Inbreeding is a terrible thing. >> > >> > >> > Then stop doing it and let your family tree grow some real branches. >> > >> >> Sorry, I didn't realise you held the monopoly on it. Hey, I am sure it >> makes >> it easier for you to remember father / mothers day though. And you only >> need >> a small house for a family get together. No wonder you want to keep it >> all >> to yourself. > > > Nice try. Must be some of that lowbrow british humor. No, I was being serious for once. I just thought that your, erm, talents were due to the gene puddle you stem from being a bit muddied.
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 16:26 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:4526B589.2BC8C2E4(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> news:452691FD.529EE2BD(a)earthlink.net... >> >T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >> >> news:4525CE02.456E30F6(a)earthlink.net... >> >> >T Wake wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to gather >> >> >> foreign >> >> >> intelligence. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Unless you are a terrorist, what are you worried about? >> >> > >> >> >> >> Interesting argument. >> >> >> >> I work in corporate security and often work for governmental >> >> organisations, >> >> will you please surrender to me all your bank records so I can check >> >> what >> >> transactions take place. I also want you to record your movements and >> >> actions at all times. >> >> >> >> I am sure, that as you are not a terrorist, you will have no qualms >> >> against >> >> this. >> >> >> >> I await the data. >> > >> > >> > It wouldn't do you any good. I am on a small VA pension that barely >> > pays the bills. Anyway, I don't have a bank account. >> > >> >> I think you are lying until you can prove otherwise. That >> notwithstanding, >> you've assumed I want your money - I don't, I want to reassure myself you >> are not a terrorist. >> >> You also need to let me know all your movements and everyone you speak >> to. > > > I am a disabled veteran, on a VA pension. think for yourself. Here we reach the crux of the problem. I am an able bodied veteran yet you implied I was a terrorist if I didn't want people to intercept my communications. It seems you dont want people you dont approve of having _your_ personal detail either. > I don't have a bank account, I have a Credit Union account, which you > didn't ask about. The movement already has that information, and you as > a foreigner have no right to ask. Which brings me right back in a circle. You really do have a short attention span dont you. I said it was wrong for _your_ country to intercept my communication. You said "Unless you are a terrorist, what are you worried about?" It is heart warming to know that double standards remain firmly in place. > Movements? Well, I haven't had one yet today, but thanks for asking. > I'll send it to you for your investigation if you need it. You haven't had one but it is aware of your Credit Union account? Strange. > If you want to know who I talk to, hire a P.I. I don't feel like > asking everyone I have to talk to their names, because it isn't my > business to ask. Even if I did, they have no reason to tell me. You're > the security expert so it should be really easy for you to investigate > me. > > BTW, don't bother with an IP lookup, it shows the wrong city. > You must be a terrorist then. You are refusing to reveal your activities and your IP points somewhere else. What are you trying to hide here? My role in security is not to spy on people it is to prevent it happening where appropriate and prevent break ins (mainly).
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 16:27 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4526B105.12FC91D9(a)hotmail.com... > > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >Listening to their greivances isn't 'ceding' btw. >> >> >> >> Arafat used this tactic. He kept people at the table talking >> >> about peace to give his side time to accumulate weapons. He >> >> even got all these rich countries to fund his efforts. >> > >> >You're suggesting that because one person did this then we must never >> >again listen ? That's a very blinkered view indeed. >> >> It is a tactic that worked. Don't you think others will try >> the same thing if it succeeds in fooling all of the Democrats >> all of the time? > > So you're not going to listen to anyone you disagree with ? > There are lots of people who take that approach.
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 16:28
"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:91ddi2tv6es9cnoll8rq4g2ca2kjm1af43(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 04:45:03 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>John Larkin wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:10:34 +0100, Eeyore >>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >John Larkin wrote: >>> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >John Larkin wrote: >>> >> >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>A lot of this anti-US fervor started with Democrat Presidential >>> >> >> >>candidates trying out their sound bytes in 2002-2004 in Europe. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>/BAH >>> >> >> >OH BS. It started with Bush invading another nation. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Actually, it started with FDR invading another nation. France, >>> >> >> specifically. >>> >> > >>> >> >You're being very very silly. >>> >> > >>> >> >Graham >>> >> >>> >> I don't think so. A couple of things are at work here. One is the >>> >> military and cultural and technological and scientific dominance of >>> >> the USA as compared to Europe, which is bound to cause some >>> >> resentment. The other is expressed in the Chinese proverb, "if you >>> >> save someone's life, they will hate you forever." >>> > >>> >You really are monumentally stupid. >>> >>> You are fat, poor, unhappy, and frustrated by the state of the world. >>> I am none of these. Explain to me why I am the stupid one here. >> >>Because you're stupidly happy in your profound ignorance ? >> >>The only thing that worries me about the 'state of the world' is what >>idiocy America's up to next. > > --- > Bullshit. > > All you're trying to do is avoid having to account for yourself in a > way which won't cast you in a bad light. > > How much do you weigh? > > How much do you make? > > How much do you laugh? > > Who would you like to see dead? > > Are you willing to answer even just _one_ of the questions? > I wouldn't be. |