Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 20:27 On 06 Oct 2006 13:30:16 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> Gave us: > >He never said that he hates something. You say he hates.... You have ZERO powers of comprehension if, while reading his posts merely through this one thread, you do not feel that he indeed hates. Try again, chump.
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 20:33 On 06 Oct 2006 19:23:35 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> wrote: >John Fields wrote: > > >> Try laughing at yourself; everyone else does... :-) > > >Me not. He angles for compliments -- Nicely said. --- >(Thanks Graham, I am honoured), strange in the first but with a good >British Heart. --- Which you'd support unequivocally? --- >John. You... what could I say. You are the perfect example for anti >American Liberty thinking. --- Pretty perverted idea from your side, it seems to me. I get to say what I want to and then you get to shut me down because you disagree with me? What happened to debate? It's unacceptable because you'll lose? Get used to it, loser. --- >I know the thinking (Liberty) is coming also >from Indian Influence, of course ;-). But let it.... when the US is >such a Big Time/s player, then account the thousand of years of their >culture. No, Not sooo much.. :) just a bit. (For the first... calm >down man. You cannot rule the world, but otherwise, no one is in the >slightest strong enough, to capture Amerika) --- The last part was right and the next to the last part was wrong. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 20:36 On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:46:19 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:kp8bi29dil5b9l2ib6oakv7sn227f8450o(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:49:33 -0500, John Fields >> <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: >> >>>On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:48:51 +0100, Eeyore >>><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>>> >>>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>> > lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush >>>>> >>calling >>>>> >>a criticism "unacceptable." >>>>> > >>>>> > Which criticism was unacceptable? >>>>> > >>>>> > I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't >>>>> > think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion >>>>> > about >>>>> > something. >>>>> > >>>>> > You can't have it both ways. >>>>> >>>>> Calling "criticism" "unacceptable" is not an opinion--it's an >>>>> argument-winning tactic that involves tacitly silencing anybody who >>>>> disagrees with you. >>>> >>>>Criticism was considered unacceptable in 1930s Germany too. >>> >>>--- >>>If the parallel is valid, expect to hear someone knocking on your >>>door because of your antics here. >> >> Ooooooohhhh.... That would be so.... R I G H T E O U S !!! >> >> I'd love to see the video on Cops! > >Do you deliberately conform to stereotypes? Are you infact a plant for the >left wingers to create ridicule? > You're a goddamned retard, boy.
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 20:41 On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:01:41 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:7fcbi2t7o8chj90omrt9n69qg4jqjiejq8(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:44 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" >> <nobody(a)nowhere.com> Gave us: >> >>> >>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>news:ros9i2tlko096r3d7cr9usjfl8f0kg25oe(a)4ax.com... >>> >>>>>Going from discussion to trying to find personal identification? Pretty >>>>>much >>>>>the definition. >>> >>>> This is Usenet, dumbass. "Finger" and many other trace utilities >>>> have been around for decades as well as the right to utilize them. >>>> >>>> If you were any more clueless, you'd be the definition of >>>> something... RETARDEDNESS. >>> >>>Many people write letters to the editor of the local paper. Few try to go >>>to >>>the address of the writers. Those few are stalkers. >>> >> >> You're an idiot. People don't stalk idiots. You prove that one >> *can* be wrong *all* the time. >> >> Doing a lookup on *your* IP address is NOT stalking, dipshit. > >Do you type one handed? > I, in fact, used to develop database apps for OLTP handling, and I could stand over the shoulder of one of my data entry girls and type with either hand to show them how to use the screen entry form(s). This was back in the 286/386/2Mb/s coax ethernet days. So, yes, I can type one handed quite well. The brain knows where all the keys are. Do you have a point, dipshit?
From: JoeBloe on 6 Oct 2006 20:44
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:39:51 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >what the voices in your head are saying without >any processing You're a goddamned loon. |