Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: John Larkin on 6 Oct 2006 18:19 On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 21:57:28 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >news:4526C148.40E07BEA(a)earthlink.net... >> John Larkin wrote: >>> >>> Well, they do bring up some subjects that are interesting, and give me >>> opportunities to practice my writing styles. And, actually, conversing >>> with fat, unhappy European neurotics makes me appreciate my life and >>> my country even more! >>> >>> John >> >> >> Amen! Good food and a good day at the range shooting Eurotrolls. >> What could be better? The reason they taste like chicken? They ARE >> Chickens! ;-) > >It is easy to talk big on USENET. In reality all you are doing is making it >look like you cant maintain a coherent point of view for more than about 40 >seconds. > >I am sure you think this makes you look good. I suspect some of the others >here think it does as well. The reality however is very different. > It doesn't matter how you look; that's a neurotic fallacy. What matters is how you feel. John
From: Ken Smith on 6 Oct 2006 18:24 In article <mSuVg.13911$7I1.8854(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: [....] >> In the US >> it is normal to state which party you belong to when registering to vote. > >No, it isn't. You only have to declare if you want to vote in a primary >election, so that they can make sure you vote in the right primary. The majority do register. No-one says "Oh you registered! That's not normal", therefor is renew my claim that it is "normal". -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 18:26 John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > > > >> Do you personally know anyone who doesn't carry some form of > >> identification? > > > >What do you call a " form of identification " ? > > > >It's not compulsory to carry a driving licence with you in the UK and I don't. > > --- > What do you use for identification when you use a credit card or > cash a check? A PIN. Actually I haven't cashed a cheque in decades. I use a card for cash. Graham
From: Ken Smith on 6 Oct 2006 18:32 In article <kurtullman-DC5895.11205006102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx>, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >In article <eg5o0o$hr$1(a)blue.rahul.net>, > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: > >> In article >> <kurtullman-8C3615.09514505102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx>, >> Kurt Ullman <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >In article <eg3143$okg$2(a)blue.rahul.net>, >> > kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >> [....] >> >> >> >> On (2) we have external evidence that he did try to get OBL. It was all >> >> over the news and the Neocons yelled "wag the dog" about it. >> > >> > If he did not consistently get interested in OBL about the time >> >Monica was to testify, etc., he might not have heard that as much. >> >> Do you have any proof of either part of that? > > Google the attacks and monica's testimony. Look at the dates. Stare >in wild wonder. According to Google, Monica was about to testify Jan 24, 1999.The article on the Clinton effort to get OBK says Thursday on August 20, 1998. Yes, it was in the same decade. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Eeyore on 6 Oct 2006 18:32
John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >JoeBloe wrote: > > > >> Yes. The difference between little London streets and the > >> metropolises contained in this country are vast. > >> There would be double decker spill overs everywhere. Most places > >> wouldn't support them at all due to the way our traffic light/power > >> line systems are strung. > > > >So, if our double deckers work fine on our 'little London streets' how are they going > >to have a problem on big American ones ? > > --- > The steering wheel is on the wrong side. Believe it or not they do make LHD ones too. Graham |