From: lucasea on 7 Oct 2006 00:42 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:h1vdi2t5quk2uvbtcogbq0nburnajq4356(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:09:43 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:pabbi21hj1om31j3avpn3mm32vdur9mo0n(a)4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >>> >>>>You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was >>>>leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages >>>>around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite. >>>>Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken. >>> >>> Good one. >> >>Sycophant. >> > Agreeing with someone does NOT make me a sycophant, you Usenet total > retard. Sycophant. ERic Lucas
From: lucasea on 7 Oct 2006 00:42 "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message news:hfudi2hp2m6cmqq78q5itha8c4qd3c0fdi(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:16:32 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >> >>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>news:n3hbi2t6cgbhv45958p3tgd8o2snitarrh(a)4ax.com... >>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:59:52 +0100, "T Wake" >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>> >>>> >>>><lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >>>>news:6d%Ug.9902$e66.1245(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... >>>>> >>>>> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:tOmdnf6_-qawlbnYRVnyiw(a)pipex.net... >>>>>> >>>>>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:4522F755.6FBE3BED(a)hotmail.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> T Wake wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > That's not my recollection. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, it is my recollection though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fair nuff ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> You need to stop reading too much implied criticism where there >>>>>>>> >> isnt >>>>>>>> >> any. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > There's been *loads* ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my posts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A misunderstanding it seems. >>>>>> >>>>>> Possibly. The joys of the text based USENET. :-) >>>>> >>>>> Yes, let's do stick to getting offended by the *ex*plicit insults. >>>>> There >>>>> are way more than enough of those in this thread to go around. >>>> >>>>Yes. Easier to not get offended by anything here :-) >>>> >>> It's really difficult to accomplish though, as you keep returning :-] >> >>Aha, and you are forced to read my message how exactly? >> >>I am fairly sure Forte Agent has filters. >> > I filter nothing. That's obvious...neither on the way in nor on the way out. Nothing you say is ever filtered through any actual thought processes. Dang, this really is too easy. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 7 Oct 2006 00:46 "jenalyn" <nospam(a)houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:DKEVg.43727$DU3.32633(a)tornado.texas.rr.com... > the moderate/westernized are studying fornication, fashion, and liberal > shopping habits. In a word, typical college students. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 7 Oct 2006 00:43 "Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message news:eg72np$a4m$5(a)blue.rahul.net... > In article <4525651A.5E36C356(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >> >>> So how many prisons will we need to build, and what fraction of the GDP >>> will >>> go into staffing/supporting/maintaining them, in order to imprison 100 >>> million people? >> >>That would most likely sap the entire GDP of the USA. > > No, not since it doesn't have to happen. I only spoke of the fear of life > in prison being a deterent. If a crime is detered, it doesn't happen and > the jail isn't needed. We've killed 200,000 Iraqis, and it hasn't deterred a damn thing. We're going to have to imprison a helluva lot more than that, if we want to convince anybody to do anything we want. So, now please go back and answer the question. Eric Lucas
From: Daniel Mandic on 7 Oct 2006 03:35
JoeBloe wrote: > You have ZERO powers of comprehension if, while reading his posts > merely through this one thread, you do not feel that he indeed hates. > > Try again, chump. he is much better, attracted attention maybe one or two times. You suffers from foot-in-mouth disease, on every single post. Try again, dim-counter. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic |