Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 19:03 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:4526CF0B.BFBCF698(a)earthlink.net... >T Wake wrote: >> >> Nope. I still appear to have been spot on here. I can see how that fear >> prevents you thinking though. > > > What do I have to fear? Surely not the likes of you or the stuffed > donkey. Well, if you had replied to my message instead of cutting the context you wouldn't have had to ask that question. >> Try it one day. Honestly, the voices in your head wont mind. > > No voices, just severe tinnitus. I'm curious though, what do the > voices say? Well, you are better placed to answer that than I am. > You really do need to work to improve your inadequate trolling > skills. Sorry, I will try harder. I notice it is hard to get you to react. Do you salivate when you hear a bell?
From: Michael A. Terrell on 6 Oct 2006 19:11 Ken Smith wrote: > > In article <4526bce3$1$3495$91cee783(a)newsreader02.highway.telekom.at>, > Daniel Mandic <daniel_mandic(a)aon.at> wrote: > >Eeyore wrote: > > > >> Bin Laden's quite possibly dead. > >> > > > > > >He died in Tora Bora > > He is driving a cab in New York. That was after he was fired as a Vegas showgirl. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: John Fields on 6 Oct 2006 19:11 On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:09:17 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >news:fueci29affhfosfvm4mo2rjnkom8h5bplt(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:17:08 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>John Fields wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >T Wake wrote: >>>> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >>>> >> > T Wake wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >> If westerners are more concerned with staying alive than having >>>> >> >> their >>>> >> >> freedoms eventually they will convert and the conflict will end. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Why would they ever convert and why do you even consider that this >>>> >> > is what >>>> >> > it's about ? >>>> >> >>>> >> Because this is the simplistic example. >>>> >> >>>> >> They would convert because, as the example said, they are more >>>> >> concerned >>>> >> with staying alive than remaining free. >>>> > >>>> >You wouldn't catch me doing it. I believe in the right to practice no >>>> >religion >>>> >at all ! >>>> >>>> --- >>>> They don't, so you'd be dead, silly boy. >>> >>>Since it's not going to happen it's hypothetical. >> >> --- >> So what? This entire argument is hypothetical, so if you buy the >> premise you buy the bit. >> >> If you dislike being in hypothetical space why do you even bother to >> show your ugly faces? >> > >Why the plural? --- Good catch! :-) Because he's two-faced. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 19:17 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:dgldi2do92odttlb5lrbn3av6alr0dh5rp(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 21:57:28 +0100, "T Wake" > <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >> >>"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >>news:4526C148.40E07BEA(a)earthlink.net... >>> John Larkin wrote: >>>> >>>> Well, they do bring up some subjects that are interesting, and give me >>>> opportunities to practice my writing styles. And, actually, conversing >>>> with fat, unhappy European neurotics makes me appreciate my life and >>>> my country even more! >>>> >>>> John >>> >>> >>> Amen! Good food and a good day at the range shooting Eurotrolls. >>> What could be better? The reason they taste like chicken? They ARE >>> Chickens! ;-) >> >>It is easy to talk big on USENET. In reality all you are doing is making >>it >>look like you cant maintain a coherent point of view for more than about >>40 >>seconds. >> >>I am sure you think this makes you look good. I suspect some of the others >>here think it does as well. The reality however is very different. >> > > It doesn't matter how you look; that's a neurotic fallacy. What > matters is how you feel. Ok, fair one. If making post like that make him (or anyone else) feel good, excellent. I would question the mind of the type of person who feels good calling others names on USENET but then, I am not a psychiatrist and have no idea what I am talking about.
From: T Wake on 6 Oct 2006 19:19
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4526CF50.AA89F3F3(a)hotmail.com... > > > John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >T Wake wrote: >> >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote.. >> >> >> >> >> >> > That's very hypothetical but I reckon I'd fight against any >> >> >> > tyranny >> >> >> > suppressing important freedoms. >> >> >> >> >> >> Aha, you only defend "Important" freedoms. Ok. >> >> > >> >> >It was meant to be emphasis about *fighting*. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Busted!!! >> >> >> >> If it was, you would have written: >> >> >> >> "That's very hypothetical but I reckon I'd fight against any tyranny >> >> suppressing freedom." >> > >> >So ? >> >> --- >> You make a distinction between "important" freedoms and whatever's >> left over, which must be the "non-important freedoms." >> >> Which ones would those be? > > Some ppl suggest that ID cards are an infrigement of our freedoms. I'm not > completely convinced that's the case. I am. > I would consider the freedom to practice a faith of one's choice or no > faith at > all to be totally un-negotiable however. And I also think that is as well. |