Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 08:07 On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:25:15 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > ><lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message >news:sxVUg.13307$7I1.4380(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net... >> >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> news:wo6dnaYdAMyDh7nYRVny3w(a)pipex.net... >>> >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> news:efvu0c$8ss_002(a)s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> >>>> Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find >>>> the ones were posted by thoughtful people. >>> >>> Reasonable enough wish, although it carries the risk that you only read >>> posts which say things you already agree with.... Always seems kind of >>> pointless to me. >> >> Seems that's what most people in this discussion want...and if you don't >> give it to them, they'll swear at you, insult you, and even threaten >> physical violence and assault. I have learned a lot from the few >> *reasonable* posters in this thread, both those I agree with *and* those I >> don't...and there are even a few people in the discussion with whom I >> disagree but they still showed respect for my opinion. It's too bad that >> everyone else is so insecure in themselves and their views that the >> slightest difference of opinion brings obscenity, insults and threats of >> violence instead of healthy discussion. >> > >Sadly it is what passes for normal debate on USENET most of the time though >:-) > Said the retard that claims to be so smart, yet makes posts where he claims that someone's uncle was molesting them. "Daily treats" he called them. Yep. You're right up there at the top of the heap, T Weak.
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Oct 2006 07:09 In article <4526B159.9B15DA36(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >What exactly is it that you're afraid of ? >> >> >> >> Loss of enough knowledge of how to do things that it will >> >> take another 1000 years to reinvent the wheel. >> > >> >Are you actually serious ? >> >> Yes. I'm working on a 1000 year scenario and trying to shortcut >> the cold start so that it will only be 500 years. > >In 500 years Islam will have 'grown up'. They are at the age that Christianity was in the 1500s. I've been studying that era. Assuming (this is a big assumption) that religions follow similar growing paths, take the same time for each growing pain, there is going to be quite a bit of mess before things gets settled down. The key is to contain the mess-making so that enough of the human race is left to continue the current civilization. I don't think there will be enough time. Five years is needed. /BAH
From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 08:12 On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:22:31 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:f7vdi2pcfgnpdem7c3d1auv1jujf9dmald(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:21:48 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>> >>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>news:vgdci29a8p13kfhhs2i6rnm9b36duq7r72(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:06:03 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >>>>>news:regbi2dpkrf103e4opion58ooto1lmft2c(a)4ax.com... >>>>> >>>>>> It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous. >>>>> >>>>>Yes, I suspect it is he who is incredulous at your idiocy. I think the >>>>>word >>>>>you wanted is "incredible", as in "not credible". >>>>> >>>> >>>> No. It was said just fine. >>>> >>>> Nothing you say carries any credence either. >>> >>>Ooh, such a big word. Did you have to look it up? Bet you had a little lie >>>down afterwards, didn't you? >>> >> I'd bet that I used the word many more years ago than you ever did, >> and in these groups too. > >Well, maybe in SED but I bet you didn't in sci.physics. Also, I bet I used >it before you did, more importantly I bet I used it in its proper context >before you first did. > You'd lose. I used it before Usenet. Back in the seventies. If anything, all you did was abuse it... like you do Usenet.
From: JoeBloe on 7 Oct 2006 08:12 On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:23:30 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:l5vdi2lvneofr8ug993t476pbqc2c89jo9(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 20:20:54 +0100, "T Wake" >> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >> >>>What happened on the 9th of November? >> >> >> You're an idiot. > >Is 9th November "you're an idiot day?" > >Wow. You must really love it. Do people buy you presents as well? > You're a total retard.
From: jmfbahciv on 7 Oct 2006 07:11
In article <p6adnUf13uDVN7vYRVnyrg(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eg57vi$8ss_013(a)s831.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <45253CB2.A36CCD05(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? >>>> >>>> Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to >>>> alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it >>>> alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist. >>> >>>Tell me more about this threat you perceive. >>> >>>What exactly is it that you're afraid of ? >> >> Loss of enough knowledge of how to do things that it will >> take another 1000 years to reinvent the wheel. > >Then we need to have a War on Faith Schools in the west. We can add a War >against the Arts and Humanities departments as well. Your facetious answer so you can ignore the issue is noted. /BAH |