From: John Larkin on
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 02:40:14 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
>"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message
>news:qm9gi297oamqd9flmtc4291edbfh6k9e2n(a)4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:13:25 +0100, Eeyore
>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>>
>>>> I give up--I was wrong. You weren't sincere when you said you examine
>>>> your
>>>> assumptions. You don't even admit what assumptions you make, and what
>>>> political filter you put information through. You're no worse than the
>>>> other knee-jerk reactionaries on either side of this thread. If you are
>>>> the
>>>> future of the political process in this country, we are in real trouble.
>>>>
>>>> Just a hint, though...you might want to try having conversations with
>>>> actual
>>>> mainstream Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than reading some right-wing
>>>> claptrap written to justify the US's current bad behavior and applying
>>>> it to
>>>> all of Muslim society.
>>>
>>>The problem is that the above kind of thought is now being branded as
>>>traitorous
>>>in the USA.
>>
>> ---
>> Really?
>>
>> Can you cite some examples or is that just some more of your
>> Ameriphobia?
>
>Bush. Rumsfeld. Need any more?
>

You are accusing people of saying things, without citations, and then
wailing about how bad they are to say them. How clever of you.

John

From: Daniel Mandic on
Eeyore wrote:

> No Islamic state was ever a world power.
>
> Graham


Hmmm, when you do not count the Turks into, yes.


Best regards,

Daniel Mandic
From: Eeyore on


John Fields wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >
> >> If you had your way, everybody would convert to Islam. OK.
> >> Assume that.
> >
> >Let's not assume that at all.
> >
> >No-one going to convert to Islam here under duress. How daft can you be to even
> >imagine such a thing ?
> >
> >
> >> Since the factions are already killing each
> >> other, what makes you think that they will stop killing and
> >> murdering and destroying all infrastructure? The goal
> >> is to destroy Western infrastructure. This means bridges,
> >> roads, computers, any science results and their applications,
> >> white collar jobs, blue collar jobs, manufacturing plants,
> >> food processing plants, etc.
> >
> >No it isn't. You're utterly mad.
>
> ---
> That doesn't mean he's wrong, though.

He assuredly is along with anyone else who believes in this phantom menace.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


John Fields wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >John Larkin wrote:
> >> On Fri, 06 Oct 06 11:26:29 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >>Our freedoms are under threat as a result of American stupidity.
> >> >
> >> >Now I understand you. It is not Bin Laden's fault that he
> >> >is going to kill a lot of people. It's the Americans' fault
> >> >that caused Islamic extremists to want to destroy Western
> >> >civilization.
> >>
> >> That's actually true. "American" culture, which is actually world
> >> culture, is the thing they fear will seduce their sons and liberate
> >> their daughters. As it must.
> >
> >You flatter yourself about the impact of American 'culture'.
>
> ---
> No, you delude yourself about strength of its impact.
>
> Do you own a pair of jeans? A cellphone? A PC?

What have they to do with America culture ?

Do you fly by jet airliner ?

Graham

From: Eeyore on


John Larkin wrote:

> Eeyore<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >You flatter yourself about the impact of American 'culture'.
>
> Did I flatter myself? I hadn't noticed.
>
> As I said - perhaps you missed it - that American culture is in fact
> world culture. Most anything that's fun to read, listen to, or eat
> gets enthusiastically absorbed and amplified here, from Nepalese food
> to AfroPop to Irish folk music. We are more an intersection of
> cultures than a driver, although we do make our occasional donations
> to the pool. This world culture is what many regionalists fear will
> destroy their own culture - as it will - and many call it "American",
> which it really isn't.

This isn't a uniquely American phenomenon.

Graham