Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Daniel Mandic on 8 Oct 2006 15:48 Eeyore wrote: > Better quality foods ? Stuff like modern hydrogenated fats actually > *shortens* lives ! What a ridiculous idea. > > Graham Yes. Ppl become also old in the old time, or medieval. 80 and more. Of course, mainly by the richer one. Some distressing worldwide is welcomely awaited by me. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: Daniel Mandic on 8 Oct 2006 15:48 John Fields wrote: > That doesn't mean he's wrong, though. > ;) He's not wrong and you are Right. Is this the tactic? Or other... tell me your definition to the opposite of 'wrong'! I bet my five pence it is 'right'. Best Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: John Larkin on 8 Oct 2006 15:56 On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:07:55 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > >"jenalyn" <nospam(a)houston.rr.com> wrote in message >news:GnEVg.43721$DU3.24861(a)tornado.texas.rr.com... >> "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:K4XTg.7154$N4.5515(a)clgrps12... >>> >>> "Gordon" <gordonlr(a)DELETEswbell.net> wrote in message >>> news:00c0i29vn31ejl71pku1d0r1nfaevj6p4i(a)4ax.com... >>> >>>>>So you are saying they are NOT better Xtians than everyone else? >>>>> >>>> No, I'm saying that this war on terrorism started long before >>>> President Bush and the present Republican administration was >>>> involved in any way. >>> >>> But it isn't a war. It is a problem for a police force that requires >>> international cooperation, something the US is notoriously unable or >>> unwilling to be involved in. >> >> The international community does not want our cooperation. They want the >> United States to act as their dumb guard dog, do their bidding. Many >> leaders are generally unhappy with the fact that we finally stepped up to >> take charge. France is unhappy they are no longer a world power. Muslims >> are unhappy they are no longer a world power. > >When were Muslims a world power? > google "muslim empire" for the details. John
From: JoeBloe on 8 Oct 2006 16:00 On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 02:32:42 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> Gave us: > >> "JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >> news:780gi25ruponn590krd8cgvvt9p3catitk(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:13:31 +0100, "T Wake" >>> <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: >>> >>>>It is ok, it was an imaginary elephant. In the real world, imaginary >>>>things >>>>cant hurt you. As an aside, I know what imaginary numbers *are* and I >>>>also >>>>know there is no way *you* are juggling them. >>> >>> I say again. You *know* nothing. > >Repetitive sycophant. The void between your ears is astounding.
From: John Larkin on 8 Oct 2006 16:06
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 02:28:45 GMT, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >news:a5-dnQ-NUaXtiLXYnZ2dnUVZ8s6dnZ2d(a)pipex.net... >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:45280F9F.89B24BE1(a)hotmail.com... >>> >>> >>> John Larkin wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:13:25 +0100, Eeyore >>>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> I give up--I was wrong. You weren't sincere when you said you >>>> >> examine your >>>> >> assumptions. You don't even admit what assumptions you make, and >>>> >> what >>>> >> political filter you put information through. You're no worse than >>>> >> the >>>> >> other knee-jerk reactionaries on either side of this thread. If you >>>> >> are the >>>> >> future of the political process in this country, we are in real >>>> >> trouble. >>>> >> >>>> >> Just a hint, though...you might want to try having conversations with >>>> >> actual >>>> >> mainstream Middle Eastern Muslims, rather than reading some >>>> >> right-wing >>>> >> claptrap written to justify the US's current bad behavior and >>>> >> applying it to >>>> >> all of Muslim society. >>>> > >>>> >The problem is that the above kind of thought is now being branded as >>>> >traitorous >>>> >in the USA. >>>> >>>> Absurd. American newspapers, public forums, political parties, and >>>> public institutions are full of different opinions, vigorously and >>>> publicly stated. A very few people call the opinions of other to be >>>> traitorous, and that's allowed free speech, too. >>>> >>>> You say so much about the USA and you know so little. >>> >>> So why are the Republicans branding criticism as treasonous ? >> >> Not all Republicans. > >Nah, just the President, that's all. Nobody important. > >Eric Lucas > Got any quotes? John |