Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 21 Oct 2006 12:49 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:464db$453a4706$49ecfae$4431(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > >> "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >> news:a8a9c$453a3a5b$49ecfae$4118(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>Eeyore wrote: >>> >>> >>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>I know I do not write clear enough for all values of IQs. >>>> >>>> >>>>Mine's 152. >>>> >>>>What's yours ? >>> >>> >>>You're good at taking IQ tests. Doesn't actually >>>mean you're "smart." > >> You are a funny guy. > > That too, but it doesn't negate my comment above. It was never meant to. Your comment was valid. IQ does not mean smart. You are not smart and probably have a low IQ. Your comment above had nothing to add to the thread and was simply you wanting to get in on the action. Why dont you go and eat some more doughnuts. >> I have realised you are a Left Wing plant to try and discredit the Right >> Wingers in this thread. Well done. > > This is very good. The more confused you and your > brothers are the better for me. You are more confused than most.
From: T Wake on 21 Oct 2006 12:51 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:4c99d$453a4bba$49ecfae$4540(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake dsitorts as only a Muslim can: > >> "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >> news:c82fa$453a411d$49ecfae$4310(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>T Wake wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I actually go out of my way to try and comprehend your point of view. >>>>You obviously choose not to show me the same courtesy and, when your >>>>standpoint becomes untenable, you fall back on accusing me of deliberate >>>>misunderstanding. >>> >>>>Well done. >>> >>>She's right. You're a Muslim or a Muslim shill. >> >> >> Nonsense. But keep making your assumptions based on whatever you want to >> make up >> >> >>>That being said, >>>you're so brainwashed your "truths" are limited to what you've >>>been "carefully taught." (see _South Pacific_) >> >> >> Your idiocy overwhelms me. > > > You have once again left my arguments intact. Thank you. Your arguments only exist intact in your fevered imagination. You have no argument about me being a Muslim any more than I can say you are mental health patient who thinks he is a Nazi storm trooper in disguise. Now, as I said, you adhere to your McCarthy-esque approach which assumes I am a Muslim because I disagree with you. You haven't read enough to see what my view point is, you simply assume it. I am proud of you.
From: T Wake on 21 Oct 2006 12:56 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:368df$453a4791$49ecfae$4431(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: >> "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >> news:7433b$453a35b5$49ecfae$3982(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>Eeyore wrote: >>> >>>>unsettled wrote: >>>> >>>>>Brother killing brother was not stopped by >>>>>conversion to Islam. It remains prevalent in >>>>>the culture. >>>> >>>> >>>>OK then. Cite please. >>> >>>google islam killing 8,370,000 hits (arguments both ways) >> >> >> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=christian+killing >> >> 17,300,000 hits. >> >> Is there a point to your post? > > Sure, he asked for a cite about brother killing brother, > so I gave him a URL to follow. Your understanding is really impaired. I feel sorry for you. He asked for a cite about brother killing brother being prevalent in Islamic cultures. You said "google islam killing 8,370,000 hits (arguments both ways)" That is not a citation about fratricide being prevalent in the culture. It is an exhortation to google it himself. > Now you've tried to turn > it into a dicksize war. Not at all. Please do try to keep up. I simply demonstrated that it is _not_ a cultural prevalance unique to Islam. You dont realise this because you are obsessed with what the voices in your head tell you the posts mean. In reality, your reference had as many links to Muslims killing Christians, Christians killing Muslims etc as anything else. In fact you failied to provide the citation which supported your claims.
From: Eeyore on 21 Oct 2006 12:57 unsettled wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > > The survey was to determine death rates from all causes pre and post > > war. Quite simple really. > > > > Pre-war of course there weren't any deaths from either US killings or > > any insurgents. > > And of course you faithfully believe Saddam's historical > records as being accurate and true! Bwahahahahahaha The figures for the pre-war era encountered by the group tally with CIA figures ! Graham
From: T Wake on 21 Oct 2006 12:57
"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:e3a4f$453a456b$49ecfae$4431(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake distorts as only a Muslim can: > > >>>You're clearly a sock puppet adhering to >>>someone else's agenda. > >> Hahaha. Nice one. You are a funny guy. Whose agenda am I adhering to? > > Your Mullah's, unless you are a Mullah! So you have no answer then? Only a vague "reds under the bed" response. > > Are >> you JoeBloe? (I doubt it because you can use more than two or three words >> at a time). > > My identity is unimportant. My statements are what I offer. Yeah. Pity that is all you have to offer though, isnt it. >> Generally speaking, your posts are meaningless and full of badly thought >> out comments. Good work all round really. > > Thank you. Coming from you I take this as your ultimate > compliment. You are welcome. It was meant as a compliment. |