Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: lucasea on 21 Oct 2006 15:50 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:39928$453a3515$49ecfae$3982(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >> news:19699$453974ae$49ecfc2$31364(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: >>> >>> >>>>"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >>>>news:3afe9$4538c549$49ecf72$25771(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >>> >>>>>T Wake wrote: >>> >>>>>>If the West changed to Islamic based societies life would continue >>>>>>largely as normal. >>> >>>>>Normal in Islamic based societies is brothers killing >>>>>brothers in religious fanaticism, thank you very much! >>> >>>>Proof, please. >>> >>>Pay attention to what's happeing in the world right >>>now and read some non-western history. >> >> >> A few wackos are attacking innocents. How exactly does that equate to >> "Normal in Islamic based societies is brothers killing brothers"? You >> need to learn to think critically, and not tar an entire society by the >> actions of a few. > > You cited half a million Iraqui dead. > > How many were killed by the west, and how many by > your terribly mischaracterized "a few wackos?" Those wackos wouldn't be there if we hadn't invaded. Here's a clue: they *weren't* there before we invaded. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 21 Oct 2006 15:57 "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message news:C-ydnUWDRbUIpqfYnZ2dnUVZ8tWdnZ2d(a)pipex.net... > Who ever morphed into "unsettled" [snip] That's an interesting supposition. I've been thinking this unsettled clown is some sort of unearthly love child of JoeBloe and that Michael Terrell fellow, only with less ability to reason. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 21 Oct 2006 16:07 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:c387f$453a4078$49ecfae$4299(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >T Wake wrote: > >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:ehd3gi$8qk_007(a)s884.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > >>>The regular people were not allowed to watch a soccer match >>>(TV shows human images which is not allowed in Islam). Now >>>the regular people are starting to say no to these extremists. > >> Which is why there is very little to fear from extremism. > > I give you all of WW2 and both the Soviet and the Nazi > extremism. How is that relevant to this discussion? Did you read the sentence BAH wrote: "Now the regular people are starting to say no to these extremists". When did that ever happen in Germany or the USSR? >Socio-political extremist movements are > to be feared and destroyed at the earliest possible > stage. Oh, you mean like the Bush administration's extremist assaults on other nations and on his own Constitution? > Of course they do. Just how well do you remember your first > lover compared to the current one (assmuing, out of the blue, > that in real life you might actually be enough of an actor to > be lovable :-) He's not the one here spewing unjustified hatred--that would be you. > Seeking guidance is a euphamism for introspection while > bringing to the fore one's entire value system. Uh, no....he claims to literally talk to God. Please do keep up with the news in your own country. >> but at least we are not a super power and there are (currently) >> significant checks and balances to prevent > > a religious upsurge. > > See how you are! You don't want a Christian religious > upsurge in your country, but a Muslim one would be OK! Uh, no.... the latter ain't gonna happen. Please do learn to think critically when you hear soundbites from the Shrub. Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 21 Oct 2006 16:10 "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:c82fa$453a411d$49ecfae$4310(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > She's right. You're a Muslim or a Muslim shill. Uh...that would be *you* that said that. Having trouble keeping straight what you say under what alias, unsettled, erm, I mean BAH, erm, I mean unsettled? Eric Lucas
From: lucasea on 21 Oct 2006 16:14
"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message news:7db9$453a413d$49ecfae$4310(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... > >T Wake wrote: > >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:ehd4o6$8qk_004(a)s884.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> >>>I'm not going to deal with this one. >> >> So why make any post? Why not just ignore it? > > Because she had a point to make, and made it. What was that...that she's in the habit of ignoring facts that she finds to be "inconvenient" in the face of her most tenaciously held fallacious assumptions? Oh, and you can drop the third person. We already caught you once mixing up your aliases. Eric Lucas > |