Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Michael A. Terrell on 30 Oct 2006 15:48 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > In article <4544FCB4.770A024C(a)earthlink.net>, > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > I was building a new workshop when I lived there. I had the walls and > >roof trusses up when I walked out one morning and opened the big steel > >doors to see a large rat snake hanging from the rafters, a few inches > >from my face. I grabbed a 2" * 4" and wrapped the snake around the end > >of it, and pulled it out of the rafters. I stepped outside and swung > >the 2" * 4" towards the marsh, and the snake went airborne. Just then a > >gator popped up out of the water, caught the snake, and disappeared. I > >didn't need any caffeine that morning. ;-) > > ROTFLAMO. What did you have for breakfast? A couple of shots > of Jack Daniels. Poor snake. > > /BAH Nothing for breakfast, or lunch. I used to skip a lot of meals, and now I'm paying for it with diabetes and high blood pressure. The snake broke our deal. If they stayed away from the house and other buildings, they were allowed to live. I killed another rat snake one night. I tried to close the door to the shop, but it was between the door and the jamb. I didn't know it was there when I tried to close the door. The door swung back at me, so I shoved it again. The second time I tried, it was flattened, and fell outside. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: Lloyd Parker on 30 Oct 2006 11:25 In article <2i8ck2hmublilp3fu01b5p72osq7c1mr00(a)4ax.com>, YD <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote: >Late at night, by candle light, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com penned this immortal >opus: > >>In article <454342E5.9F806C12(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Which word of the phrase "World Trade Center" >>>> >> do you not understand? >>>> > >>>> >In a much earlier post you suggested that Islam was anti-capitalist / >>>> business. >>>> >Maybe you'd like to take a look at this ? Or maybe you'd prefer to >>continue >>>> >living in ignorance of the facts ? >>>> > >>>> >http://www.bahrainwtc.com/ >>>> >>>> I don't webbit and it's too stormy to go to the library today. >>> >>>You're incapable of browsing the web from home ? >> >>Yes. >> >>> Just how blinkered are you ? >> >>486, DOS 6.0, Windows 3.11, and about 18Kbyte of real memory left. > >Hey, I managed to browse the web on dial-up with a 386, with about the >same sw setup and a whopping 4 megs of memory. No excuse. > >I still have the case stating it's a 386 16MHz, though it now contains >a P2-500. The lid was rusty so I painted it metal green and the front >panel is all but falling off. The paint job turned out all spotty and >and generally botched. > >- YD. > Back in my day, I had a Kaypro 2. Of course, there was no web to surf then either.
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 30 Oct 2006 17:10 lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:ei4t4d$8qk_006(a)s787.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <4544E33A.555EF3DA(a)hotmail.com>, >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>>>> You people are not thinking! Scenario: oil imports stop. >>>>>>> So who's going to be buying the oil instead of the USA ? Where did >>>>>>> the >> oil >>>> go ? >>>>>> If production hasn't been stopped, China, India, and parts of Europe >>>>>> in exchange for capitulation. >>>>>> >>>>>> /BAH >>>>> They're suddenly going to increase their oil consumption by over a >>>>> factor >> of >>>>> 10??? >>>> They already have. It's going to be more. >>> Not ten times more though is it ? And not 'overnight' either. >> In economic terms, it will be overnight. > > Nice smokescreen. We were talking about an oil embargo, which happens > overnight in *actual* terms. You implied that China is going to soak up the > extra oil consumption, but it will not happen to allow the OPEC nations to > keep from going bankrupt. Please try to focus and stay on point--defending > your wacko theories by trying to shift the discussion is a very disingenuous > arguing tactic...although it is what the Bush administration has been doing > for 6 years. > > Eric Lucas > China is massively investing in coal liquefaction plants. -- Dirk http://www.onetribe.me.uk - The UK's only occult talk show Presented by Dirk Bruere and Marc Power on ResonanceFM 104.4 http://www.resonancefm.com
From: unsettled on 30 Oct 2006 18:54 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <Lga1h.2227$s6.11(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >>"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >>news:cb1d3$45452d8a$4fe72af$23817(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>snip >>> >>> >>>>Nothing about annihilation of western civilization is amusing. >>>>This is serious business and it will take another three massive >>>>killings before the insane politicians are thrown out and >>>>ones who are willing to deal with problem constructively are >>>>put back in power. >>> >>>Those who persist in denying the announced and obvious >>>end up driving the defensive system towards an eventual >>>dictatorial authority. >>> >>>Hitler's Mein Kampf was not a secret. The agenda was >>>mapped out in advance. Militant Islam has been advocating >>>against the west for decades. Despite the protestations >>>of some, it is a religion spread by violence and has been >>>from the day that Mohammed decided he was heading up a >>>new religion. >>> >>>If we look at British conduct in the face of Hitler's >>>growing menace, we see the same sorts of appeasement >>>as is being promoted in these related threads. In the >>>case of Britain, they eventually put Churchill in >>>charge. He was one of those "last choice" sorts of >>>men that the appeasers disdained. They historically >>>worked hard to derail him but there came a moment >>>of truth when they were finally unable to deny the >>>realities facing them any longer, and needed a >>>strong man to drive them towards victory. By that >>>time they were in trouble, so America was pulled >>>into the fray, with its own dictator style president >>>at the helm replaced eventually (after death) by a >>>sleeper sort of a strong man who didn't hesitate to >>>use the atomic bomb to end the Pacific war. >>> >>>How many today would have the nerve to actually use a >>>nuclear weapon? Certainly none of the appeasers here >>>want that to happen, but by their actions they're >>>driving the system towards the point where other >>>options will cease to exist. >>> >>>Unfortunately, with the sorts of "good human beings" >>>we're encountering in this newsgroup, we'll probably >>>evenually get to the point where we'll have to use >>>our own final solution to the problem by using nukes. >>> >>>History has taught us that it is a much smaller mess >>>if you take care of business and protect yourself >>>early in the game, rather than late. Keep on ignoring >>>all of history folks. I'll be investing in uranium >>>futures. >> >>BAH--this is a new low for you. Self-congratulation and attacking other >>posters by using another screen name. > > > Huh? I can't write that well. You will assume any posture just > to avoid the facts of what is really going on. I don't know > how to deal with this kind of insanity. By making this sort of accuation he's avoiding the issues. He didn't have a single point to make about the content of the post. And if one considers the content of his posting, it actually has nothing at all to do with what's above. If anyone deserves to be ignored, he does.
From: unsettled on 30 Oct 2006 18:55
John Larkin wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 06 12:54:57 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >>>Follow that lemming! >> >>Exactly. It is the lemming myth coming true. I keep wondering >>if this isn't what happened with Tower of Babel. Then I think >>about the net and its global access. I've thousands of >>hypotheses and have thrown out most of them. >> > > > > Which is a heap better than having one, and sticking to it. That all depends on how a hypothesis pans out. |