From: Adam Funk on
On 2009-12-28, Peter T. Daniels wrote:

> On Dec 27, 11:18 pm, "sjdevn...(a)yahoo.com" <sjdevn...(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:

>> Just in my experience, it's about 50/50 whether it's pronounced in a
>> horribly mangled semi-phonetic manner or whether it's vaguely like
>> "Gerta" but with a more elongated German-style oe first syllable and
>> at most a partially vocalized "r"--I wouldn't call "Goethe" and
>> "Gerta" homophones.  The horribly mangled version is basically "Geth",
>> which rhymes with "death".-
>
> Never heard that one. The street in Chicago (next to Schiller) is go-
> thee (voiceless th).

AIUI, "Drakestraße" in Berlin is commonly pronounced /'drak@"Stras@/
although it should be /'dre(j)k"Stras@/ after Sir Francis Drake (I
don't recall why a street in Berlin is named after him, but I used to
know someone who lived nearby and told me this).


--
....the reason why so many professional artists drink a lot is not
necessarily very much to do with the artistic temperament, etc. It is
simply that they can afford to, because they can normally take a large
part of a day off to deal with the ravages. [Amis _On Drink_]
From: António Marques on
Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote (29-12-2009 19:45):

> If anyone doubted whether the difference between f and v was phonemic
> one could think of endless examples to show that it was, including some
> very common words like "life" and "live" (adjective). So there does seem
> to be something special about the two th sounds. Is there any mechanism
> that could explain why minimal pairs are so rare?

Is this so different from the case with german ch? (It is different in a
quantitative sense, inasmuch as some speakers undoubtedly do have one ch
phoneme while others may have two; but it's similar inasmuch as it's a
borderline case.)
From: António Marques on
Nathan Sanders wrote (29-12-2009 20:49):

> There are plenty of near-minimal pairs for /T/ and /D/ (some depending
> on dialect): earthy/worthy, author/bother, thin/then (a true minimal
> pair for US Southerners), thin/this, thank/than, etc.

Earthy/worthy being a very good one since the words belong to the same
specific class (not only both are referents, both are adjectives).
From: António Marques on
Nathan Sanders wrote (29-12-2009 20:49):

> /D/ and /T/ are the second and third rarest consonant phonemes in
> English respectively (about 0.1% and 0.3% by type frequency), and
> since words can be rather long in English, the probability of a
> minimal pair existing between /T/ and /D/ is very small.

If only one of the were rare, of course, that wouldn't be an argument. It's
the fact of both being rare that makes it ponderous.
From: Brian M. Scott on
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:49:20 -0500, Nathan Sanders
<nathansanders(a)aol.com> wrote in
<news:nathansanders-B6B9FC.15492029122009(a)88-136-209-74.adslgp.cegetel.net>
in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.lang,alt.usage.english,alt.philosophy:

[...]

> The rarest consonant is /Z/ (0.07%), and minimal pairs
> between /Z/ and /T/ or /D/ are difficult to find, if not
> impossible (I can't think of any off the top of my head,
> because the number of words with /Z/ is so small to
> begin with).

He can pleasure a plethora of women? <g>

<Leather> and <leisure> work for some speakers.

To go with <measure> the OED has <mether> (with [�]),
chiefly Irish English and chiefly historical: 'A wooden
vessel used for measuring liquids; a square wooden drinking
vessel, freq. used as a measure of liquor. Also (Sc.): a
similar vessel used for holding or measuring grain (rare).'

The best I can do for [�] is a nomen agentis <oather> 'one
who oaths' and <osier>. <Oather> is a legitimate though
practically non-existent formation from the verb 'to impose
an oath on'; I have seen it in some sort of gaming context.

I take that back: I've seen <mether> 'one who uses crystal
meth'.

Brian