From: mpc755 on
On Jun 12, 10:47 am, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
> mpc755 a crit :
>
> > On Jun 12, 10:38 am, YBM <ybm...(a)nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
> >> mpc755 wrote:
> >>> On Jun 12, 4:12 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Jun 12, 12:32 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>> [nonsense]
> >>> [nonsense]
> >> Here is a photograph of Raemsch (aka BURT) and mpc755:
>
> >>http://taylorjoy.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/dd1.jpg
>
> > [mpc usual mantra]
> > I agree with Bohm.
>
> Dumby, you cannot agree with something you do not understand, and by
> far.

I realize you are like most and exist in a state of delusional denial
which is why you can not answer either of the following questions.

A C-60 molecule is in the slit(s). Detectors are placed at the exits
to the slits. The C-60 molecule is always detected exiting a single
slit. A C-60 molecule is in the slit(s). Detectors are placed and
removed from the exits to the slits. The C-60 molecule creates an
interference pattern in and of itself. How is this possible?

What occurs physically in nature which allows a C-60 molecule to
enter, travel through, and exit multiple slits simultaneously without
requiring energy, releasing energy, or having a change in momentum,
exit the slits, interfere with itself and create an interference
pattern in and of itself?

The following is the most correct explanation of what occurs
physically in nature to date:

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit. The aether wave enters
and exits multiple slits. The aether wave creates interference upon
exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the aether
wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference.

"In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
through exactly one of the slits."

Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.

I agree with Bohm.

The 'wavefunction' physically exists in nature as an aether wave.
From: BURT on
On Jun 12, 1:12 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 12:32 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 11, 9:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 11, 11:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I think molecules of any kind go through purely as particles.
>
> > > I understand the above to mean you think the C-60 molecule travels a
> > > single continuous path through three dimensional space as a self
> > > contained entity.
>
> > > > I do not believe in molecular vibrations only atom and subatomic
> > > > particle vibrations with a measurable aether wave.
>
> > > I understand the above to mean the moving C-60 molecule has an
> > > associated aether wave.
>
> > Well that is the opposite of what I am telling you I believe. Do you
> > see that? If you do then you understand what I am saying.
>
> > I don't need subterfuge here. I see this is a form spin.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> "In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
> slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
> through exactly one of the slits."
>
> Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.
>
> I agree with Bohm.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I don't believe light has a wavefunction only a force wave.

Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on
On Jun 12, 2:21 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 1:12 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 12:32 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 11, 9:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 11, 11:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I think molecules of any kind go through purely as particles.
>
> > > > I understand the above to mean you think the C-60 molecule travels a
> > > > single continuous path through three dimensional space as a self
> > > > contained entity.
>
> > > > > I do not believe in molecular vibrations only atom and subatomic
> > > > > particle vibrations with a measurable aether wave.
>
> > > > I understand the above to mean the moving C-60 molecule has an
> > > > associated aether wave.
>
> > > Well that is the opposite of what I am telling you I believe. Do you
> > > see that? If you do then you understand what I am saying.
>
> > > I don't need subterfuge here. I see this is a form spin.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > "In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
> > slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
> > through exactly one of the slits."
>
> > Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.
>
> > I agree with Bohm.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I don't believe light has a wavefunction only a force wave.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

The force wave is an aether wave.

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit. The aether wave enters
and exits multiple slits. The aether wave creates interference upon
exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the aether
wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference.

"In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
through exactly one of the slits."

Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.

I agree with Bohm.

The 'wavefunction' physically exists in nature as an aether wave.
From: BURT on
On Jun 12, 3:12 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2:21 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 1:12 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 12, 12:32 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 11, 9:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 11, 11:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I think molecules of any kind go through purely as particles.
>
> > > > > I understand the above to mean you think the C-60 molecule travels a
> > > > > single continuous path through three dimensional space as a self
> > > > > contained entity.
>
> > > > > > I do not believe in molecular vibrations only atom and subatomic
> > > > > > particle vibrations with a measurable aether wave.
>
> > > > > I understand the above to mean the moving C-60 molecule has an
> > > > > associated aether wave.
>
> > > > Well that is the opposite of what I am telling you I believe. Do you
> > > > see that? If you do then you understand what I am saying.
>
> > > > I don't need subterfuge here. I see this is a form spin.
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > "In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
> > > slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
> > > through exactly one of the slits."
>
> > > Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.
>
> > > I agree with Bohm.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I don't believe light has a wavefunction only a force wave.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> The force wave is an aether wave.
>
> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit. The aether wave enters
> and exits multiple slits. The aether wave creates interference upon
> exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
> travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the aether
> wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference.
>
> "In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
> slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
> through exactly one of the slits."
>
> Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.
>
> I agree with Bohm.
>
> The 'wavefunction' physically exists in nature as an aether wave.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The forces are waves. Their is no force particle.

Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on
On Jun 12, 6:24 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 3:12 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 2:21 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 12, 1:12 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 12, 12:32 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 11, 9:25 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 11, 11:32 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I think molecules of any kind go through purely as particles.
>
> > > > > > I understand the above to mean you think the C-60 molecule travels a
> > > > > > single continuous path through three dimensional space as a self
> > > > > > contained entity.
>
> > > > > > > I do not believe in molecular vibrations only atom and subatomic
> > > > > > > particle vibrations with a measurable aether wave.
>
> > > > > > I understand the above to mean the moving C-60 molecule has an
> > > > > > associated aether wave.
>
> > > > > Well that is the opposite of what I am telling you I believe. Do you
> > > > > see that? If you do then you understand what I am saying.
>
> > > > > I don't need subterfuge here. I see this is a form spin.
>
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > "In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
> > > > slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
> > > > through exactly one of the slits."
>
> > > > Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.
>
> > > > I agree with Bohm.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > I don't believe light has a wavefunction only a force wave.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > The force wave is an aether wave.
>
> > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> > C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit. The aether wave enters
> > and exits multiple slits. The aether wave creates interference upon
> > exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
> > travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the aether
> > wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference.
>
> > "In de Broglie–Bohm theory, the wavefunction travels through both
> > slits, but each particle has a well-defined trajectory and passes
> > through exactly one of the slits."
>
> > Bohm states the particle passes through exactly one of the slits.
>
> > I agree with Bohm.
>
> > The 'wavefunction' physically exists in nature as an aether wave.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> The forces are waves. Their is no force particle.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

A moving C-60 molecule is a particle which has an associated aether
displacement wave.