Mass-Energy Equivalence [Math]

Prev: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th Edition Incropera, DeWitt Solutions Manual
Next: From the book: "How to Succeed in College Mathematics - A Guide for the College Mathematics Student", Richard M. Dahlke, Ph.D., 2008.

From: mpc755 on 27 Apr 2010 15:08

On Apr 27, 3:00Â pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 11:53Â am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 27, 2:36Â pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 27, 4:59Â am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 27, 1:17Â am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because
> > > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is,
> > > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory,
> > > > > and here is a more-refined argument."
>
> > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory.
>
> > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'.
>
> > > > Stating the following:
>
> > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory.
>
> > > > and:
>
> > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
>
> > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory.
>
> > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say:
>
> > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
>
> > > If you were let have that what would you have?
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > You would have the understanding of the physics of nature.
>
> Yes. But what do you have?
>

I have Aether Displacement (AD).

http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf

"A possible candidate for dark energy that avoids some of the fine-
tuning problems associated with the cosmological is quintessence, a
very low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
known universe. In addition to its effect on the expansion of the
universe, quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
interactions with matter and radiation."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quintessence

"quinÂ·tesÂ·sence
â â/kwÉªnËtÉsÉns/ Show Spelled[kwin-tes-uhns] Show IPA
ânoun
1. the pure and concentrated essence of a substance.
2. the most perfect embodiment of something.
3. (in ancient and medieval philosophy) the fifth essence or element,
ether, supposed to be the constituent matter of the heavenly bodies"

A low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
known universe is aether as a one something.

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.

Aether is the pure essence of matter.

"quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
interactions with matter"

Aether interacts with matter by being displaced by matter.

The pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter manifests itself as
gravity.

The following image represents the aether's state of displacement as
determined by its connections with the matter. The image would be more
accurate if the grid connected to and through the Earth. This would
more accurately reflect Einstein's concept of the state of the aether
is determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the
aether in neighboring places:

http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2005/11/16/16nov_gpb_resources/vortex1_crop.jpg

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity
by
Albert Einstein'

"What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of
relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that
the state of the former is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places,
which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations;
whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of
electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and
is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity
is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute
constants for the functions of space which describe the former,
disregarding the causes which condition its state."
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

The cause which conditions its state is its displacement by matter.

Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constant
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047

"There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity
for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter
level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam
system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that
gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the
informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence
space effectively âflowsâ towards matter. However this is not a âflowâ
of some form of âmatterâ through space, as previously considered in
the aether models or in the ârandomâ particulate Le Sage kinetic
theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the
quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a
geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the âflowâ in
one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not
relative to some a priori background geometrical space"

What is described as "space effectively âflowsâ towards matter" is the
pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter.

"Then the âflowâ in one region is relative only to the patterns in
nearby regions"

http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/

Quote from Albert A Michelson's lecture circa 1899.

"Suppose that an aether strain corresponds to an electric charge, an
aether displacement to the electric current, aether vortices to the
atoms; if we continue these suppositions, we arrive at what may be one
of the grandest generalizations of modern science, namely that all the
phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations
of the various modes of motion of one all-pervading (substance), the
aether. The day seems not to distant when the converging lines from
many apparently remote regions of thought will meet on some common
ground. Then the nature of the atom and the forces called into play in
their chemical union, the interactions between these atoms and the
non-differentiated aether as manifested in the phenomena of light and
electricity , the structure of the molecule, the explanation of
cohesion, elasticity and gravitation, all of these will be marshaled
into a single compact and consistent body of scientific knowledge."

I would modify the statement to read:

"all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different
manifestations of the various states of one all-pervading (substance),
the aether."

http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

Albert Einstein:

"the state of the former is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places"

I would modify the statement to read:

The state of the aether as determined by the connections with the
matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
aether's state of displacement.

Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
Aether is displaced by matter.
Displacement creates pressure.
Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.

'Frictionless supersolid a step closer'
http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html

"Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without
friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such
particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer
who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the
swimming pool."

In the analogy the swimmer is any body and the water is the aether.
Just as the swimmer displaces the water, whether the swimmer is at
rest with respect to the water, or not, a body displaces the aether,
whether the body is at rest with respect to the aether, or not.

In the analogy the moving swimmer creates a displacement wave in the
water. A moving body creates a displacement wave in the aether.

'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum
medium and the inertial motion of particles'
http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf

"Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic
particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory
makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as
the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and
the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a
quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results
of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum
medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though
interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and
thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion."

A particle in the super fluid medium displaces the super fluid medium,
whether the particle is at rest with respect to the super fluid
medium, or not. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the
super fluid medium.

A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
the aether.

Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
nucleus which is the matter which is the object.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
by the double solution theory
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
of an external field acting on the particle."

"This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
located."

de Broglie's definition of wave-particle duality is of a physical wave
and a physical particle. The particle occupies a very small region of
the wave.

In AD, the external field is the aether. In a double slit experiment
the particle occupies a very small region of the wave and enters and
exits a single slit. The wave enters and exits the available slits.

A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
the available slits. When the aether displacement wave exits the slits
it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule
travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the
associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and
there is no interference.

The Casimir Effect is caused by gravity.

Each and every nucleus which is the matter which is the plate
displaces the aether. The aether displaced by one plate extends past
the other plate. The pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the
plates forces the plates together.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
by the double solution theory
Louis de BROGLIE'
http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

"These are essentially based on the way in which quantities
respectively characterizing the regular v wave and the internal u0
wave of the particle connect with the neighbourhood of the singular
region. u0 would have to increase very sharply as one penetrates the
singular region."

This is similar to Einstein's concept of:

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity
by
Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places".

There is a connectedness between the particle and the neighborhood.
There is a connectedness between the matter and the aether.

The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
aether's state of displacement.

'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A.
EINSTEIN'
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass
diminishes by L/c2."

The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer
exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as
aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three
dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether
and matter is energy.

In AD, mass is conserved.

The rate at which an atomic clock 'ticks' is based upon the aether
pressure in which it exists. In terms of motion, the speed of a GPS
satellite with respect to the aether causes it to displace more aether
and for that aether to exert more pressure on the clock in the GPS
satellite than the aether pressure associated with a clock at rest
with respect to the Earth. This causes the GPS satellite clock to
"result in a delay of about 7 Ã¬s/day". The aether pressure associated
with the aether displaced by the Earth exerts less pressure on the GPS
satellite than a similar clock at rest on the Earth "causing the GPS
clocks to appear faster by about 45 Ã¬s/day". The aether pressure
associated with the speed at which the GPS satellite moves with
respect to the aether and the aether pressure associated with the
aether displaced by the Earth causes "clocks on the GPS satellites
[to] tick approximately 38 Ã¬s/day faster than clocks on the ground."
(quoted text from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_relativity_on_GPS).

The state of the aether is determined by its connections with the
matter which is the Earth. This means the aether is less connected to
the Earth where the airplanes fly in the 'Hafele and Keating
Experiment' than it is to the surface of the Earth. If you looked up
from the surface of the Earth to 'see' the aether it would appear as
if the aether were 'flowing' east to west compared to the surface of
the Earth. The aether is still 'flowing' west to east but not at the
same rate as the surface of the Earth.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/Relativ/airtim.html

"Relative to the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory, the
flying clocks lost 59+/-10 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and
gained 273+/-7 nanosecond during the westward trip, where the errors
are the corresponding standard deviations."

Flying with the Earth's rotation, eastward, is flying against the
'flow' of aether, relative to the surface of the Earth, causing a
greater aether pressure on the atomic clock causing the atomic clock
to tick slower. Flying against the Earth's rotation, westward, is
flying with the 'flow' of aether, relative to the surface of the
Earth, causing a lower aether pressure on the atomic clock causing the
atomic clock to tick faster.

There is a train and an embankment.

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places" -
Albert Einstein

Relative to the train and the embankment the state of the aether is
most determined by its connections with the matter which is the Earth.

This means the aether is more 'localized' with respect to the
embankment than it is to the train.

Three Observers get together at M'. They each hold an atomic clock.
They synchronize their clocks. One Observer begins to walk to B'. As
the Observer walks to B' the observer, and the clock, are walking
against the 'flow' of aether. This increases the aether pressure on
the clock and causes the clock to tick slower. The Observer walking
the clock to A' is walking with the 'flow' of aether which reduces the
pressure associated with the aether on the atomic clock and the atomic
clock ticks faster.

When the Observers get to A' and B' their clocks are once again under
the same amount of aether pressure as is the clock at M' and all three
clocks tick at the same rate. Let's assume the clocks at A', M', and
B' read 12:00:05, 12:00:03, and 12:00:01 respectively when they are at
A', M', and B'.

A flash of light occurs at A/A' and B/B'. The light arrives at M
simultaneously. The flash of light occurs at B' when the clock at B'
reads 12:00:01. The flash of light occurs at A' when the clock at A'
reads 12:00:05.

The light from B' propagates with the 'flow' of aether and takes 5
seconds to reach M'. The light from A' propagates against the 'flow'
of aether and takes 9 seconds to reach M'. The light from the
lightning strike at B/B' arrives at M' when the clock at M' reads
12:00:08. The light from the lightning strike at A/A' arrives at M'
when the clock at M' reads 12:00:12.

The three Observers get back together to discuss the experiment. The
Observer at B' says the flash at B' occurred at 12:00:01. The Observer
at A' says the flash of light at A' occurred at 12:00:05. The Observer
at M' says the flash from B' arrived at 12:00:08 and the flash from A'
arrived at 12:00:12. The Observers conclude the lightning strikes were
not simultaneous and the light propagated at 'c' from B' to M' and
propagated at 'c' from A' to M' and both sets of light waves took 7
seconds to arrive at M'.

If the Observers on the train knew their state with respect to the
state of the aether then the Observers would have been able to
determine the rate at which their clocks ticked as they were walked to
A' and B' and they would have been able to conclude the lightning
strikes occurred simultaneously, in nature.

Light propagates at 'c' with respect to the aether.

The following is an explanation of what occurs in nature in a 'delayed
choice quantum eraser' experiment. Following the explanation are two
experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement.

In the image on the right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment
When the downgraded photon pair are created, in order for there to be
conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is maintained.
This means the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the
other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downgraded photons
travels either the red or blue path towards D0 and the other photon
travels either the red or blue path towards the prism.

There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and
blue paths. The aether waves propagating towards D0 interact with the
lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves
create interference which alters the direction the photon travels
prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns
being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they
arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the
'down' photons when they arrive at D0.

Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3.
Since there is a single path towards D3 there is nothing for the wave
in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern
and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being
detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons
arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The
same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4.

Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at
D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons
arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for
photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and
pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down'
photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons
arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both
the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether
waves create interference which alters the direction the photon
travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all
'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created
which reflects back to the interference both sets of photons are
creating at D0.

Figures 3 and 4 here:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf
Show the interference pattern of the 'up' and 'down' photons. If you
were to combine the two images and add the peaks together and add the
valleys together you would have the interference pattern of the
original photon. This is evidence the downgraded photon pair maintain
the original photons momentum and have opposite angular momentums.

Nothing is erased. There is no delayed choice. Physical waves in the
aether are traveling both the red and blue paths and when the paths
are combined the waves create interference which alters the direction
the photon 'particle' travels.

Experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement:

Experiment #1:

Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters
BSca and BScb. Have the photons reflected by mirror Ma interact with
BSca and have the photons reflected by mirror Mb interact with BScb.
Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a,
D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through
BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and
propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the
photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the
corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference
pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the
photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will
form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons
are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b,
and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of
detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even
need to be created in order to 'go back' and determine the
interference patterns created at D0.

Experiment #2:

Alter the experiment. When the downgraded photon pair are created,
have each photon interact with its own double slit apparatus. Have
detectors at one of the exits for each double slit apparatus. When a
photon is detected at one of the exits, in AD, the photon's aether
wave still exists and is propagating along the path exiting the other
slit. When a photon is not detected at one of the exits, the photon
'particle' along with its associated aether wave exits the other slit.
Combine the path the aether wave the detected photon is propagating
along with the path of the other photon and its associated aether
wave. An interference pattern will still be created. This shows the
aether wave of a detected photon still exists and is able to create
interference with the aether wave of another photon, altering the
direction the photon 'particle' travels.

From: BURT on 27 Apr 2010 15:15

On Apr 27, 12:08Â pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 3:00Â pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 27, 11:53Â am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 27, 2:36Â pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 27, 4:59Â am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 27, 1:17Â am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because
> > > > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is,
> > > > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory,
> > > > > > and here is a more-refined argument."
>
> > > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory.
>
> > > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'.
>
> > > > > Stating the following:
>
> > > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory.
>
> > > > > and:
>
> > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
>
> > > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory.
>
> > > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say:
>
> > > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
>
> > > > If you were let have that what would you have?
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > You would have the understanding of the physics of nature.
>
> > Yes. But what do you have?
>
> I have Aether Displacement (AD).
>
> http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf
>
> "A possible candidate for dark energy that avoids some of the fine-
> tuning problems associated with the cosmological is quintessence, a
> very low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
> known universe. In addition to its effect on the expansion of the
> universe, quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
> interactions with matter and radiation."
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quintessence
>
> "quinÂ·tesÂ·sence
> â â/kwÉªnËtÉsÉns/ Show Spelled[kwin-tes-uhns] Show IPA
> ânoun
> 1. the pure and concentrated essence of a substance.
> 2. the most perfect embodiment of something.
> 3. (in ancient and medieval philosophy) the fifth essence or element,
> ether, supposed to be the constituent matter of the heavenly bodies"
>
> A low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
> known universe is aether as a one something.
>
> Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
>
> Aether is the pure essence of matter.
>
> "quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
> interactions with matter"
>
> Aether interacts with matter by being displaced by matter.
>
> The pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter manifests itself as
> gravity.
>
> The following image represents the aether's state of displacement as
> determined by its connections with the matter. The image would be more
> accurate if the grid connected to and through the Earth. This would
> more accurately reflect Einstein's concept of the state of the aether
> is determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the
> aether in neighboring places:
>
> http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2005/11/16/16nov_gpb_resou...
>
> 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity
> by
> Albert Einstein'
>
> "What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of
> relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that
> the state of the former is at every place determined by connections
> with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places,
> which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations;
> whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of
> electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and
> is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity
> is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute
> constants for the functions of space which describe the former,
> disregarding the causes which condition its state."http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html
>
> The cause which conditions its state is its displacement by matter.
>
> Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constanthttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047
>
> "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity
> for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter
> level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam
> system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that
> gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the
> informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence
> space effectively âflowsâ towards matter. However this is not a âflowâ
> of some form of âmatterâ through space, as previously considered in
> the aether models or in the ârandomâ particulate Le Sage kinetic
> theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the
> quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a
> geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the âflowâ in
> one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not
> relative to some a priori background geometrical space"
>
> What is described as "space effectively âflowsâ towards matter" is the
> pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter.
>
> "Then the âflowâ in one region is relative only to the patterns in
> nearby regions"
>
> http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/
>
> Quote from Albert A Michelson's lecture circa 1899.
>
> "Suppose that an aether strain corresponds to an electric charge, an
> aether displacement to the electric current, aether vortices to the
> atoms; if we continue these suppositions, we arrive at what may be one
> of the grandest generalizations of modern science, namely that all the
> phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations
> of the various modes of motion of one all-pervading (substance), the
> aether. The day seems not to distant when the converging lines from
> many apparently remote regions of thought will meet on some common
> ground. Then the nature of the atom and the forces called into play in
> their chemical union, the interactions between these atoms and the
> non-differentiated aether as manifested in the phenomena of light and
> electricity , the structure of the molecule, the explanation of
> cohesion, elasticity and gravitation, all of these will be marshaled
> into a single compact and consistent body of scientific knowledge."
>
> I would modify the statement to read:
>
> "all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different
> manifestations of the various states of one all-pervading (substance),
> the aether."
>
> http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html
>
> Albert Einstein:
>
> "the state of the former is at every place determined by connections
> with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places"
>
> I would modify the statement to read:
>
> The state of the aether as determined by the connections with the
> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> aether's state of displacement.
>
> Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
> Aether is displaced by matter.
> Displacement creates pressure.
> Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.
>
> 'Frictionless supersolid a step closer'http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html
>
> "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without
> friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such
> particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer
> who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the
> swimming pool."
>
> In the analogy the swimmer is any body and the water is the aether.
> Just as the swimmer displaces the water, whether the swimmer is at
> rest with respect to the water, or not, a body displaces the aether,
> whether the body is at rest with respect to the aether, or not.
>
> In the analogy the moving swimmer creates a displacement wave in the
> water. A moving body creates a displacement wave in the aether.
>
> 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum
> medium and the inertial motion of particles'http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf
>
> "Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic
> particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory
> makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as
> the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and
> the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a
> quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results
> of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum
> medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though
> interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and
> thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion."
>
> A particle in the super fluid medium displaces the super fluid medium,
> whether the particle is at rest with respect to the super fluid
> medium, or not. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the
> super fluid medium.
>
> A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
> at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
> individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
> the aether.
>
> Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
> as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
> is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
> nucleus which is the matter which is the object.
>
> 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> by the double solution theory
> Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
>
> "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
> wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
> of an external field acting on the particle."
>
> "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
> theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
> where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
> natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
> be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
> located."
>
> de Broglie's definition of ...
>
> read more Â»- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

How does aether displacement effect the energy of light?

Mitch Raemsch

From: hanson on 27 Apr 2010 15:15

Aether John "mpc755" <mpc755(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> Aether John "mpc755" <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> what you should ... what "one" should say, because
> one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is,
> "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory,
> and here is a more-refined argument."
>
> Aether John "mpc755"
> That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory.
> That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following:
> Aether Displacement is a unified theory and:
> Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
> Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory.
> If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say:
> Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
>
> hanson wrote:
> ... Aether John,
>
Aether John cranked himself & wrote:
Wrong name.
>
hanson wrote:
.... ahahahahaha... well, so I will label you as
"mpc755", the "Aether Pimp" or "Aether Peddler".
>
> hanson wrote:
> you may be quite right, as long as
> you define what "is" is... It worked for Bill Clinton.
> Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahanson
>
Aether Pimp n' Peddler wrote:
That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory.
>

hanson wrote:
.... ahahahahaha... No good. You did not define what
"is" is. All you did was to Pimp n' Peddle your unified
tripe about Aether Displacement... ahahahaha...
>
Aether Pimp n' Peddler wrote:
[Snipped the repetition of your Aether Pimping n' Peddling]
>
hanson wrote:
Thanks for the laughs, you splendid Aether pimp... ahahaha
ahahahaha...ahahahahahanson

From: hanson on 27 Apr 2010 15:15

Aether John "mpc755" <mpc755(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>"hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> Aether John "mpc755" <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> what you should ... what "one" should say, because
> one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is,
> "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory,
> and here is a more-refined argument."
>
> Aether John "mpc755" wrote:
> That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory.
> That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following:
> Aether Displacement is a unified theory and:
> Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
> Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory.
> If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say:
> Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
>
> hanson wrote:
> ... Aether John, you may be quite right, as long as
> you define what "is" is... It worked for Bill Clinton.
> Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahanson
>
Aether John "mpc755" cranked himself wrote:
Wrong name douchebag.
That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory.
That is why I also add in 'to date'. Stating the following:
Aether Displacement is a unified theory ...and:
Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory.
If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say:
Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
>
hanson wrote:
.... ahahahaha.. It is not clear why "douchebag" is
the "wrong name" for your "Aether Displacement
theory"
But you are wholly correct to say that your Aether
Displacement" has influenced your own Weltbild:
Thanks for the laughs, Aether John... ahahahanson

From: mpc755 on 27 Apr 2010 17:47

On Apr 27, 3:15Â pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 12:08Â pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 27, 3:00Â pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 27, 11:53Â am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 27, 2:36Â pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 27, 4:59Â am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 27, 1:17Â am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > what you should ... what "one" should say, because
> > > > > > > one cannot assume that one is wholly correct, is,
> > > > > > > "aether dysplacement might be a Unified Theory,
> > > > > > > and here is a more-refined argument."
>
> > > > > > That is why I say Aether Displacement is 'a' unified theory.
>
> > > > > > That is why I also add in 'to date'.
>
> > > > > > Stating the following:
>
> > > > > > Aether Displacement is a unified theory.
>
> > > > > > and:
>
> > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct unified theory to date.
>
> > > > > > Leaves the door open for the next more correct unified theory.
>
> > > > > > If I knew I was wholly correct, I would say:
>
> > > > > > Aether Displacement is the unified theory.
>
> > > > > If you were let have that what would you have?
>
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > You would have the understanding of the physics of nature.
>
> > > Yes. But what do you have?
>
> > I have Aether Displacement (AD).
>
> >http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf
>
> > "A possible candidate for dark energy that avoids some of the fine-
> > tuning problems associated with the cosmological is quintessence, a
> > very low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
> > known universe. In addition to its effect on the expansion of the
> > universe, quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
> > interactions with matter and radiation."
>
> >http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quintessence
>
> > "quinÂ·tesÂ·sence
> > â â/kwÉªnËtÉsÉns/ Show Spelled[kwin-tes-uhns] Show IPA
> > ânoun
> > 1. the pure and concentrated essence of a substance.
> > 2. the most perfect embodiment of something.
> > 3. (in ancient and medieval philosophy) the fifth essence or element,
> > ether, supposed to be the constituent matter of the heavenly bodies"
>
> > A low-energy field with a wavelength comparable to the size of the
> > known universe is aether as a one something.
>
> > Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
>
> > Aether is the pure essence of matter.
>
> > "quintessence might also manifest itself through its possible
> > interactions with matter"
>
> > Aether interacts with matter by being displaced by matter.
>
> > The pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter manifests itself as
> > gravity.
>
> > The following image represents the aether's state of displacement as
> > determined by its connections with the matter. The image would be more
> > accurate if the grid connected to and through the Earth. This would
> > more accurately reflect Einstein's concept of the state of the aether
> > is determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the
> > aether in neighboring places:
>
> >http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2005/11/16/16nov_gpb_resou...
>
> > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity
> > by
> > Albert Einstein'
>
> > "What is fundamentally new in the ether of the general theory of
> > relativity as opposed to the ether of Lorentz consists in this, that
> > the state of the former is at every place determined by connections
> > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places,
> > which are amenable to law in the form of differential equations;
> > whereas the state of the Lorentzian ether in the absence of
> > electromagnetic fields is conditioned by nothing outside itself, and
> > is everywhere the same. The ether of the general theory of relativity
> > is transmuted conceptually into the ether of Lorentz if we substitute
> > constants for the functions of space which describe the former,
> > disregarding the causes which condition its state."http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html
>
> > The cause which conditions its state is its displacement by matter.
>
> > Gravitation, the 'Dark Matter' Effect and the Fine Structure Constanthttp://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0401047
>
> > "There we see the first arguments that indicate the logical necessity
> > for quantum behaviour, at both the spatial level and at the matter
> > level. There space is, at one of the lowest levels, a quantumfoam
> > system undergoing ongoing classicalisation. That model suggest that
> > gravity is caused by matter changing the processing rate of the
> > informational system that manifests as space, and as a consequence
> > space effectively âflowsâ towards matter. However this is not a âflowâ
> > of some form of âmatterâ through space, as previously considered in
> > the aether models or in the ârandomâ particulate Le Sage kinetic
> > theory of gravity, rather the flow is an ongoing rearrangement of the
> > quantum-foam patterns that form space, and indeed only have a
> > geometrical description at a coarse-grained level. Then the âflowâ in
> > one region is relative only to the patterns in nearby regions, and not
> > relative to some a priori background geometrical space"
>
> > What is described as "space effectively âflowsâ towards matter" is the
> > pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter.
>
> > "Then the âflowâ in one region is relative only to the patterns in
> > nearby regions"
>
> >http://home.netcom.com/~sbyers11/
>
> > Quote from Albert A Michelson's lecture circa 1899.
>
> > "Suppose that an aether strain corresponds to an electric charge, an
> > aether displacement to the electric current, aether vortices to the
> > atoms; if we continue these suppositions, we arrive at what may be one
> > of the grandest generalizations of modern science, namely that all the
> > phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations
> > of the various modes of motion of one all-pervading (substance), the
> > aether. The day seems not to distant when the converging lines from
> > many apparently remote regions of thought will meet on some common
> > ground. Then the nature of the atom and the forces called into play in
> > their chemical union, the interactions between these atoms and the
> > non-differentiated aether as manifested in the phenomena of light and
> > electricity , the structure of the molecule, the explanation of
> > cohesion, elasticity and gravitation, all of these will be marshaled
> > into a single compact and consistent body of scientific knowledge."
>
> > I would modify the statement to read:
>
> > "all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different
> > manifestations of the various states of one all-pervading (substance),
> > the aether."
>
> >http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html
>
> > Albert Einstein:
>
> > "the state of the former is at every place determined by connections
> > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places"
>
> > I would modify the statement to read:
>
> > The state of the aether as determined by the connections with the
> > matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> > aether's state of displacement.
>
> > Aether and matter are different states of the same material.
> > Aether is displaced by matter.
> > Displacement creates pressure.
> > Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter.
>
> > 'Frictionless supersolid a step closer'http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html
>
> > "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without
> > friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such
> > particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer
> > who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the
> > swimming pool."
>
> > In the analogy the swimmer is any body and the water is the aether.
> > Just as the swimmer displaces the water, whether the swimmer is at
> > rest with respect to the water, or not, a body displaces the aether,
> > whether the body is at rest with respect to the aether, or not.
>
> > In the analogy the moving swimmer creates a displacement wave in the
> > water. A moving body creates a displacement wave in the aether.
>
> > 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum
> > medium and the inertial motion of particles'http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf
>
> > "Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic
> > particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory
> > makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as
> > the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and
> > the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a
> > quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results
> > of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum
> > medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though
> > interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and
> > thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion."
>
> > A particle in the super fluid medium displaces the super fluid medium,
> > whether the particle is at rest with respect to the super fluid
> > medium, or not. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in the
> > super fluid medium.
>
> > A particle in the aether displaces the aether, whether the particle is
> > at rest with respect to the aether, or not. The particle could be an
> > individual nucleus. A moving particle creates a displacement wave in
> > the aether.
>
> > Aether is displaced by an individual nucleus. When discussing gravity
> > as the pressure associated with the aether displaced by matter, what
> > is being discussed is the aether being displaced by each and every
> > nucleus which is the matter which is the object.
>
> > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics
> > by the double solution theory
> > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf
>
> > "I called this relation, which determines the particle's motion in the
> > wave, "the guidance formula". It may easily be generalized to the case
> > of an external field acting on the particle."
>
> > "This result may be interpreted by noticing that, in the present
> > theory, the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave
> > where the amplitude is very large, and it therefore seems quite
> > natural that the internal motion rythm of the particle should always
> > be the same as that of the wave at the point where the particle is
> > located."
>
> > de Broglie's definition of ...
>
> > read more Â»- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> How does aether displacement effect the energy of light?
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Light propagates with respect to the aether.