More than 90 percent of objects found in the vast outer-solar system reservoir may have been born around other stars
in [Physics]
|
Prev: More than 90 percent of objects found in the vast outer–solar system reservoir may have been born around other stars
Next: WHEN BLACK HOLES SLOW DOWN --
From: Greg Neill on 19 Jun 2010 00:25 Brad Guth wrote: > So go right ahead and tell us where the other 90+% of nasty stuff is > coming from. What "other 90%"? You haven't demonstrated that there's more than one source, or if there is, what the breakdown of sourcing is. It would appear that you are attempting to offer a solution where there is no problem. > > I offered by interpretation which you've rejected, so now it's your > turn. You've offered nothing but unsubstantiated codswallop. In order to offer an interpretation you need to be interpreting facts. You are starting from no facts and offering fantasy.
From: Greg Neill on 19 Jun 2010 00:30 Brad Guth wrote: > The Semitic approved mainstream that you represent wants the rest of > us to believe everything about our solar system is unique if not one > of a kind, as well as having been flashed into existence from one > stellar ignition sequence that became our sun and all of its planets, > moons, Kuiper Belt and Oort cloud that's impervious to external tidal > forces or encounters. > > In other words, perfectly uniform and orderly. So tell us why is it > not uniform and orderly? I think your meds need a review. Clearly the anti-paranoiacs aren't working.
From: palsing on 19 Jun 2010 00:48 On Jun 18, 8:57 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The Semitic approved mainstream that you represent wants the rest of > us to believe everything about our solar system is unique if not one > of a kind, as well as having been flashed into existence from one > stellar ignition sequence that became our sun and all of its planets, > moons, Kuiper Belt and Oort cloud that's impervious to external tidal > forces or encounters. > > In other words, perfectly uniform and orderly. So tell us why is it > not uniform and orderly? I give up, wherever did you get the idea from me that I think our solar system is unique? In fact, I think just the opposite, I think that our solar system is typical of any others surrounding stars just like ours. I might be wrong, but for now that is what I think. What makes YOU think that I think our solar system is impervious to external forces? Why would this be? Of course, you need to remember that gravity is an inverse square law, so it drops off rapidly with distance. Rapidly. In fact, I don't know why you have this huge fixation with Sirius, because we get a bigger gravitational tug from Alpha Centauri. It is not very big tug at all, actually, but it is bigger than the tug from Sirius. Perfectly uniform and orderly? Where do you get these ideas? Ever hear of entropy? Get a grip, you have an overactive imagination. \Paul A
From: Brad Guth on 19 Jun 2010 12:20 On Jun 18, 9:25 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > Brad Guth wrote: > > So go right ahead and tell us where the other 90+% of nasty stuff is > > coming from. > > What "other 90%"? You haven't demonstrated that there's > more than one source, or if there is, what the breakdown > of sourcing is. It would appear that you are attempting > to offer a solution where there is no problem. > > > > > I offered by interpretation which you've rejected, so now it's your > > turn. > > You've offered nothing but unsubstantiated codswallop. > In order to offer an interpretation you need to be > interpreting facts. You are starting from no facts > and offering fantasy. In other words, you're calling Sam Wormley and any of his sources liars. Way to go there. You have not demonstrated any specific expertise of observationology or computer simulations whatsoever. Are you ever planning on sharing anything other than your obfuscation and denial? Are you suggesting that everything of Hubble is also either bogus or a lie? What about instruments way better than Hubble; are they also bogus? Are you suggesting the laws of physics do not apply to cosmic interactions? Why is a radii of one light year so magical, that we are protected or defended form whatever's outside? Unlike most Semites, I can honestly interpret many cosmic items as having clearly interacted with one another, and otherwise of those that'll unavoidably interact in the future, so why not with our solar system? What the hell makes our passive solar system immune from cosmic interactions? ~ BG
From: Brad Guth on 19 Jun 2010 12:21
On Jun 18, 9:30 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > Brad Guth wrote: > > The Semitic approved mainstream that you represent wants the rest of > > us to believe everything about our solar system is unique if not one > > of a kind, as well as having been flashed into existence from one > > stellar ignition sequence that became our sun and all of its planets, > > moons, Kuiper Belt and Oort cloud that's impervious to external tidal > > forces or encounters. > > > In other words, perfectly uniform and orderly. So tell us why is it > > not uniform and orderly? > > I think your meds need a review. Clearly the anti-paranoiacs > aren't working. Your faith-based analogy is noted. |