More than 90 percent of objects found in the vast outer-solar system reservoir may have been born around other stars
in [Physics]
|
Prev: More than 90 percent of objects found in the vast outer–solar system reservoir may have been born around other stars
Next: WHEN BLACK HOLES SLOW DOWN --
From: MIB on 15 Jun 2010 08:32 "Greg Neill" <gneillRE(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote in message news:9iJRn.295853$SQ1.203958(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > The sirius system's speed with respect to the solar > system is about 18 km/sec. The Sirius system is > between 200 and 300 million years old. Work out the > distance. Hint: it's *much* larger than your guess. You are wasting your time. This nut-job has been told this information before.
From: Brad Guth on 17 Jun 2010 00:15 On Jun 15, 4:16 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > Brad Guth wrote: > > On Jun 13, 8:27 pm, palsing <pnals...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 13, 8:19 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> The molecular cloud that created those impressive Sirius stars may > >>> have been worth <12.5e6 Ms (more if you'd care to include Sirius C). > >>> Are you suggesting that kind of molecular mass is also > >>> inconsequential? > > >> Since it was so far away at that time, yes, essentially > >> inconsequential. Kinda like your theories... > > >> \Paul A > > > Even 500 ly isn't far enough away. But then you don't really know > > where Sirius emerged. It could have been closer than 5 ly, or > > possibly as far as 100 ly. > > The sirius system's speed with respect to the solar > system is about 18 km/sec. The Sirius system is > between 200 and 300 million years old. Work out the > distance. Hint: it's *much* larger than your guess. I've already given you the numbers that matter the most. Pretending that nothing about the Sirius system was never very massive or nearby doesn't cut it. ~ BG
From: Brad Guth on 17 Jun 2010 00:18 On Jun 15, 4:10 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > Brad Guth wrote: > > On Jun 13, 8:05 pm, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: > >> Brad Guth wrote: > >>> On Jun 13, 6:10 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> F = m1 m2 G / r^2 > > >>>> Calculate the force between the Sirius system and the solar system > >>>> and let us know what the answer is. > > >>>> r = 2.64 0.01 pc > >>>> m1 = 1.9891 10^30 kg > >>>> m2 = 5.9628 10^30 kg > > >>>http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm > >>>http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/calculators/gravity-calculator.html > > >>> What's next? > > >> You haven't answered yet. Give us your numeric > >> result. > > > You're wasting time. Just put everything into a public funded > > supercomputer and let it run. > > > Tell us where that 90% stuff is coming from. > > So, you can't do simple calculations. Got it. In other words, you don't read or much less utilize anything via internet. Try using a public alternative rather than your private newsreader that filters everything out. ~ BG
From: Brad Guth on 17 Jun 2010 00:23 On Jun 15, 5:32 am, "MIB" <brokenaddr...(a)ask.com> wrote: > "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote in message > > news:9iJRn.295853$SQ1.203958(a)unlimited.newshosting.com... > > > The sirius system's speed with respect to the solar > > system is about 18 km/sec. The Sirius system is > > between 200 and 300 million years old. Work out the > > distance. Hint: it's *much* larger than your guess. > > You are wasting your time. This nut-job has been told this information > before. Are you playing Usenet God again? Are all Semites deathly afraid of whatever the Sirius star system has to offer? Are you suggesting there's no Oort cloud of icy Sirius debris? Are you suggesting that Sirius(B) didn't have a helium flashover? ~ BG
From: Greg Neill on 17 Jun 2010 07:24
Brad Guth wrote: > On Jun 15, 4:16 am, "Greg Neill" <gneil...(a)MOVEsympatico.ca> wrote: >> Brad Guth wrote: >>> On Jun 13, 8:27 pm, palsing <pnals...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Jun 13, 8:19 pm, Brad Guth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> The molecular cloud that created those impressive Sirius stars may >>>>> have been worth <12.5e6 Ms (more if you'd care to include Sirius C). >>>>> Are you suggesting that kind of molecular mass is also >>>>> inconsequential? >> >>>> Since it was so far away at that time, yes, essentially >>>> inconsequential. Kinda like your theories... >> >>>> \Paul A >> >>> Even 500 ly isn't far enough away. But then you don't really know >>> where Sirius emerged. It could have been closer than 5 ly, or >>> possibly as far as 100 ly. >> >> The sirius system's speed with respect to the solar >> system is about 18 km/sec. The Sirius system is >> between 200 and 300 million years old. Work out the >> distance. Hint: it's *much* larger than your guess. > > I've already given you the numbers that matter the most. > > Pretending that nothing about the Sirius system was never very massive > or nearby doesn't cut it. Your opinion is not credible evidence. As far as I can tell you haven't supplied the numbers for this calculation. Man up, do the math and deliver the numbers, if you are able. If you can't and you are so incompetent that even grade school kiddies can calculate rings around you, why should *anyone* pay attention to anything you say? |